Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 79–90

Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies

  • M. R. Raupach
  • R. H. Shaw
Article

Abstract

Most one-dimensional models of flow within vegetation canopies are based on horizontally averaged flow variables. This paper formalizes the horizontal averaging operation. Two averaging schemes are considered: pure horizontal averaging at a single instant, and time averaging followed by horizontal averaging. These schemes produce different forms for the mean and turbulent kinetic energy balances, and especially for the ‘wake production’ term describing the transfer of energy from large-scale motion to wake turbulence by form drag. The differences are primarily due to the appearance, in the covariances produced by the second scheme, of dispersive components arising from the spatial correlation of time-averaged flow variables. The two schemes are shown to coincide if these dispersive fluxes vanish.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonia, R. A. and Luxton, R. E.: 1971, ‘The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to a Step Change in Surface Roughness. Part 1. Smooth to Rough’, J. Fluid Mech. 48, 721–761.Google Scholar
  2. Finnigan, J. J.: 1979, ‘Turbulence in Waving Wheat. I. Mean Statistics and Honami’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 181–211.Google Scholar
  3. Hinze, J. O.: 1975, Turbulence, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 780 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Maitani, T.: 1978, ‘On the Downward Transport of Turbulent Kinetic Energy in the Surface Layer over Plant Canopies’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 14, 571–584.Google Scholar
  5. Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: 1971, Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, Vol. 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A. Eng. Trans. J. L. Lumley (ed.), 769 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Mulhearn, P. J.: 1978, ‘Turbulent Flow over a Periodic Rough Surface’, Phys. Fluids 21, 1113–1115.Google Scholar
  7. Mulhearn, P. J. and Finnigan, J. J.: 1978, ‘Turbulent Flow over a Very Rough, Random Surface’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 15, 109–132.Google Scholar
  8. Raupach, M. R.: 1981, ‘Conditional Statistics of Reynolds Stress in Rough-Wall and Smooth-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers’, J. Fluid Mech. 108, 363–382.Google Scholar
  9. Raupach, M. R. and Thom, A. S.: 1981, ‘Turbulence in and above Plant Canopies’, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 97–129.Google Scholar
  10. Raupach, M. R., Thom, A. S., and Edwards, I.: 1980, ‘A Wind Tunnel Study of Turbulent Flow Close to Regularly Arrayed Rough Surfaces’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18, 373–397.Google Scholar
  11. Shaw, R. H., Silversides, R. H., and Thurtell, G. W.: 1974, ‘Some Observations of Turbulence and Turbulent Transport within and above Plant Canopies’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 5, 429–449.Google Scholar
  12. Stewart, J. B. and Thom, A. S.: 1973, ‘Energy Budgets in Pine Forest’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 154–170.Google Scholar
  13. Thom, A. S.: 1968, ‘The Exchange of Momentum, Mass and Heat between an Artificial Leaf and the Airflow in a Wind Tunnel’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 44–55.Google Scholar
  14. Townsend, A. A.: 1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 429 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, N. R. and Shaw, R. H.: 1977, ‘A Higher-Order Closure Model for Canopy Flow’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 16, 1198–1205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Raupach
    • 1
  • R. H. Shaw
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Environmental MechanicsCanberra CityAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations