Theory and Decision

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 209–230 | Cite as

Morality and welfare

  • J. Moreh
Article

Abstract

The economic theory of utility does not take into account moral behaviour, that is behaviour in which an individual faced with two courses of action may choose the one which is less profitable to him. It is shown in this paper that the economic approach can be broadened to take such behaviour into account. The individual is considered to maximize a higher welfare function whose arguments are (a) his utility and (b) higher goods or moral value. The latter are goals which he ought to achieve. The amount of higher goods achieved depends upon his moral preference. The ranking of different acts is complete - an assumption commonly made in economics with regard to bundles of goods. In an extension of the economic model of optimization over time, the individual is considered to maximize his higher welfare over his lifetime. This may require raising his moral preference.

Keywords

Economic Theory Economic Model Economic Approach Moral Behaviour High Welfare 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Porath, Y.: 1967, ‘The Production of Human Capital and the Lifecycle of Earnings’, Journal of Political Economy 75, 352–365.Google Scholar
  2. Broad, C. D.: 1930, Five Types of Ethical Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M.: 1965, ‘Ethical Rules, Expected Values and Large Numbers’, Ethics 76, 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Collard, D.: 1975, ‘Edgeworth's Propositions on Altruism’, The Economic Journal 85, 355–360.Google Scholar
  5. Collard, D.: 1978, 1981, Altruism and Economy, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Collard, D.: 1983, ‘Economics of Philanthropy: A Comment’, Economic Journal 93, 637–638.Google Scholar
  7. Finnis, J.: 1982, Fundamentals of Ethics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Fishkin, J. S.: 1984, Beyond Subjective Morality, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M.: 1957, A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  10. Gintis, H.: 1974, ‘Welfare Criteria with Endogenous Preferences: The Economics of Education’, Internatinonal Economic Review 15, 415–430.Google Scholar
  11. Goodpaster, K.E.: 1982, ‘Kohlbergian Theory: A Philosophical Counterinvitation’, Ethics 92, 491–498.Google Scholar
  12. Harrod, R. F.: 1936, ‘Utilitarianism Revisited’, Mind 45, 137–156.Google Scholar
  13. Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977a, ‘Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior’, Social Research 44, 623–656, reprinted in Sen and Williams (1982).Google Scholar
  14. Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977b, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Henderson, J. M. and Quandt, R. E.: 1980, Microeconomic Theory, (3rd ed.), McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Hirshleifer, J.: 1970, Investment, Interest and Capital, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Laffont, J.-J.: 1975, ‘Macroeconomic Constraints, Economic Efficiency and Ethics: An Introduction to Kantian Economies’, Economica 42, 430–437.Google Scholar
  19. Lyons, D.: 1984, Ethics and the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mirrlees, J. A.: 1982, ‘The Economic Uses of Utilitarianism’, in Sen and Williams, pp. 63–82.Google Scholar
  21. Peston, M. H.: 1967, ‘Changing Utility Frontiers’, in M. Shubik (ed.), Essays in Mathemati- cal Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, Princeton University Press, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
  22. Posner, R. A.: 1977, Economic Analysis of Law, 2nd ed., Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Quirk, J. and Saposnik, R.: 1968, Introduction to General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, W. D.: 1930, The Right and the Good, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Sampson, E. E.: 1971, Social Psychology and Contemporary Society, John Wiley & Sons, NY.Google Scholar
  27. Samuel, W.: 1982, Personality: Searching for the Sources of Human Behavior, McGraw Hill International Book Co.Google Scholar
  28. Sen, A. K.: 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, Inc. and Oliver Boyd.Google Scholar
  29. Sen, A. K.: 1977, ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A. K. and Williams, B. (eds.): 1982, Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, C.: 1982, ‘The Diversity of Goods’, in Sen and Williams, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, M.: 1976, Anarchy and Co-operation, John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
  33. Wasserstrom, R. A. (ed.): 1971, Morality and the Law, Wadsworth Publishing Co. Inc., Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Weisbrod, B. A.: 1977, ‘Comparing Utility Function in Efficiency Terms or, What Kind of Utility Functions Do We Want?’ American Economic Review 67, 987–990.Google Scholar
  35. von Weizsäcker, C. C.: 1971, ‘Notes on Endogenous Changes of Tastes’, Journal of Economic Theory 3, 345–372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Moreh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe Queen's University of BelfastBelfastNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations