Vegetatio

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 65–78

Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: Patterns of species diversity

  • Robert K. Peet
Article

Summary

Plant species diversity patterns of the Rocky Mountain forests were found to be at variance with patterns reported from other regions. The most centrally located forests in terms of elevation, site moisture and successional status were found to have the lowest diversity. In contrast, the peripheral and environmentally more severe sites were found to have relatively high diversity. In particular, the forest-grassland transition and the low elevation riparian forests have species diversity values as high as any yet reported from western North America.

When diversity was examined in terms of variation across elevation or moisture gradients, varying results were obtained due to the interaction of these factors. The failure of previous studies to converge on generalizations about plant diversity reflects, in part, the failure of most investigators to view diversity in a regional context of variation across several interacting gradients.

Diversity was seen to vary inversely with the degree of development of the forest canopy. The interaction of different components of the forest community is one reason for the failure of general patterns of plant species diversity to emerge from previous studies. A potentially rich herb community can be greatly suppressed by a single species tree stratum.

Among the most successful work to date on species diversity is that on birds, a distinct albeit large and functional group. It is unlikely that similar success could have been achieved through work on all animal species simultaneously. This suggests the need to examine plant species diversity, not in terms of total diversity, but in terms of component functional groups, perhaps guilds, growing under similar microclimatic conditions and subject to similar competitive pressures.

Keywords

Colorado Diversity Rocky Mountains Species diversity Stratal relationships Succession 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abele, L.G. 1976. Comparative species richness in fluctuating and constant environments: Coral-associated decapod crustaceans. Science 192: 461–463.Google Scholar
  2. Auclair, A.N. & F.G., Goff. 1971. Diversity relations of upland forests in the western Great Lakes area. Amer. Nat. 105: 499–528.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzaz, F.A. 1975. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois. Ecology 56: 485–488.Google Scholar
  4. Bratton, S.P. 1975. A comparison of the beta functions of the overstory and herbaceous understory of a deciduous forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 102: 55–60.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J.H. 1971. Mammals on mountaintops: Nonequilibrium insular biogeography. Amer. Nat. 105: 467–478.Google Scholar
  6. Brünig, E.F. 1973. Species richness and stand diversity in relation to site and succession of forests in Sarawak and Brunei (Borneo). Amazoniana 3: 293–320.Google Scholar
  7. Bunin, J.E. 1975. The vegetation of the west slope of the Park Range, Colorado. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. Colorado, Boulder. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Carbiener, R. 1970. Un example de type forestier exceptionnel pour l'Europe occidentale: La fôret du lit majeur du Rhin au niveau du fossé rhénan. (Fraxino-Ulmetum Oberd. 53). Intérêtécologique et biogéographique. Comparaison á d'autres forêts thermophiles (English summary) Vegetatio 20: 97–148.Google Scholar
  9. Cody, M.L. 1975. Towards a theory of continental species diversities: Bird distributions over Mediterranean habitat gradients. In: M.L., Cody & J.M., Diamond (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp. 214–257. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, J.H. & E., Orias. 1964. The ecological regulation of species diversity. Amer. Nat. 98: 399–414.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, J.T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities. Univ. Wisc. Press, Madison. 657 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Dahl, E. 1957. Rondane: Mountain vegetation in South Norway and its relation to the environment. Skr. Norske Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo, I. Mat.-Naturv. Kl. 1956 (3): 1–374.Google Scholar
  13. Daubenmire, R.F. 1943. Vegetational zonation in the Rocky Mountains. Bot. Rev. 9: 325–393.Google Scholar
  14. Daubenmire, R.F. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Wash. Agr. Exp. Stat., Tech. Bull. 62: 1–131.Google Scholar
  15. Daubenmire, R.F. & J.B., Daubenmire. 1968. Forest vegetation of eastern Washington and northern Idaho. Wash. Agr. Exp. Stat., Tech. Bull. 60: 1–104.Google Scholar
  16. Despain, D.G. 1973. Vegetation of the Big Horn Mountains, Wyoming, in relation to substrate and climate. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 329–355.Google Scholar
  17. Diamond, J.M. 1972. Biogeographic kinetics: Estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of southwest Pacific islands. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 69: 3199–3203.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, G.W. 1972. Subalpine plant communities of the Western North Cascades, Washington. Arct. Alp. Res. 4: 147–166.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas, G.W. 1974. Montane zone vegetation of the Alsck River region, southwestern Yukon. Can. J. Bot. 52: 2505–2532.Google Scholar
  20. Fasham, M.J.R. 1977. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology 58: 551–561.Google Scholar
  21. Frydman, I. & R.H., Whittaker. 1968. Forest associations of southeast Lublin Province, Poland (German summary). Ecology 49: 896–908.Google Scholar
  22. Gauch, H.G. 1973. A quantitative evaluation of the Bray-Curtis ordination. Ecology 54: 829–836.Google Scholar
  23. Gauch, H.G. & R.H., Whittaker. 1972. Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecology 53: 868–875.Google Scholar
  24. Gauch, H.G., R.H., Whittaker & T.R., Wentworth. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.Google Scholar
  25. Glenn-Lewin, D.C. 1975. Plant species diversity in ravines of the southern Finger Lakes region, New York. Can. J. Bot. 53: 1465–1472.Google Scholar
  26. Glenn-Lewin, D.C. 1977. Species diversity in North American temperate forests. Vegetatio 33: 153–162.Google Scholar
  27. Guinochet, M. 1973. Phytosociologie. Masson, Paris. 227 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Habeck, J.R. 1968. Forest succession in the Glacier Park cedarhemlock forests. Ecology 49: 872–880.Google Scholar
  29. Harger, J.R.E. & K., Tustin. 1973. Succession and stability in biological communities. Part 1: Diversity. Int. J. Envirn. Stud. 5: 117–130.Google Scholar
  30. Hill, M.O. 1973a. Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvecter method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, M.O. 1973b. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–432.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, M.O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Appl. Statist. 23: 340–354.Google Scholar
  33. Horn, H.S. 1974. The ecology of secondary succession. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 25–37.Google Scholar
  34. Hvessalo, Y. 1922. Vegetationsstatistische Untersuchungen über die Waldtypen. Acta Forest. Fenn. 20(3): 1–73.Google Scholar
  35. Hvessalo, Y. 1973. Perä=Pohjolan luonnon normaalien metsikoiden kasvu ja kehitys. (Engl. summ.) Metsätieteellisen Tutkimuslaitoksen Julkaisuja 24(2): 1–168.Google Scholar
  36. Jeglum, J.K. 1972. Boreal forest wetlands near Candle Lake, central Saskatchewan. I. Vegetation, Musk-Ox 11: 41–58.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, W.C., R.L., Burgess & W.R., Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 59–84.Google Scholar
  38. Karr, J.R. & R.R., Roth. 1971. Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several new world areas. Amer. Nat. 105: 423–435.Google Scholar
  39. Kiener, W. 1940. Sociological Studies of the alpine vegetation on Longs Peak. Univ. Nebr. Stud., n.s. 34 (June 1967), 75 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Knight, D.H. 1975. A phytosociological analysis of species-rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecol. Monogr. 45: 259–284.Google Scholar
  41. Leigh, E.G.Jr. 1975. Population fluctuations, community stability, and environmental variability. In: M.L., Cody & J.M., Diamond (eds.), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, pp. 51–73. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, S.A. 1974. Dispersion and population interactions. Amer. Nat. 108: 207–228.Google Scholar
  43. Loucks, O.L. 1970. Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. Amer. Zool. 10: 17–25.Google Scholar
  44. Maarel, E.van der 1971. Plant species diversity in relation to management. In: E., Duffey & A.S., Watt (eds.), The Scientilic Management of Animal and Plant Communities for Conservation, pp. 45–63. Blackwell Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. MacArthur, R.H. 1969. Species packing, and what interspecies competition minimizes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 64: 1369–1371.Google Scholar
  46. MacArthur, R.H. 1970. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor. Popul Biol. 1: 1–11.Google Scholar
  47. MacArthur, R.H. & R., Levins. 1967. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Amer. Nat. 101: 377–385.Google Scholar
  48. MacArthur, R.H. & J.W., MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.Google Scholar
  49. McNaughton, S.J. 1968. Structure and function in California grasslands. Ecology 49: 962–972.Google Scholar
  50. Margalef, R. 1963. On certain unifying principles in ecology. Amer. Nat. 97: 357–374.Google Scholar
  51. Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 111 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Mason, H.L. & J.H., Langenheim. 1957. Language analysis and the concept environment. Ecology 38: 325–340.Google Scholar
  53. May, R.M. & R.H., MacArthur. 1972. Niche overlap as a function of environmental variablity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 1109–1113.Google Scholar
  54. May, R.M. 1973. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems Monogr. Popul. Biol. 6. Princeton Univ. Press, N.J. 235 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Menge, B.A. & J.P., Sutherland, 1976. Species diversity gradients: Synthesis of the roles of predation, competition, and temporal hetorogencity. Amer. Nat. 110: 351–369.Google Scholar
  56. Moir, W.H. 1969. The lodgepole pine zone in Colorado. Amer. Midl. Nat. 81: 87–98.Google Scholar
  57. Monk, C.D. 1965. Southern mixed hardwood forest of north central Florida. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 335–354.Google Scholar
  58. Monk, C.D. 1967. Tree species diversity in the eastern deciduous forest with particular reference to north central Florida. Amer. Nat. 101: 173–187.Google Scholar
  59. Moral, R.de. 1972. Diversity patterns in forest vegetation of the Wenatchee Mountains, Washington. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 99: 57–64.Google Scholar
  60. Moral, R.del. 1973. The vegetation of Findley Lake Basin. Amer. Midl. Nat. 89: 26–40.Google Scholar
  61. Nicholson, S.A. & C.D., Monk. 1974. Plant species diversity in old-field succession on the Georgia Piedmont. Ecology 55: 1075–1085.Google Scholar
  62. t.Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.Google Scholar
  63. Ogawa, H., K., Yoda & T., Kira. 1961. A preliminary survey on the vegetation of Thailand. Nature Life S.E. Asia 1: 21–157.Google Scholar
  64. Ogawa, H., K., Yoda, T., Kira, K., Ogino, T., Shidei, D., Ratanawongse & C., Apasutaya. 1965. Comparative ecological study on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. I. Structure and floristic composition. Nature Life S.E. Asia 4: 13–48.Google Scholar
  65. Oosting, H.J. & J.F., Reed. 1952. Virgin spruce-fir of the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming, Ecol. Monogr. 22: 69–91.Google Scholar
  66. Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285–307.Google Scholar
  67. Peet, R.K. 1975. Forest vegetation of the east slope of the northern Colorado Front Range. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
  68. Pfister, R. 1972. Vegetation and soils in the subalpine forests of Utah. Ph.D. thesis, Wash. State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
  69. Prusinkiewicz, Z. 1970. Die Zahl der auf dem Minimi-Areal vorkommenden Gefässpflanzenarten als Mass für die Fruchtbarkeit der Waldböden. (Engl. summ.). In: R., Tüxen (ed.), Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung). Ber. Symp. Int. Ver. Vegetationskunde, Rinteln 1966, pp. 282–296. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  70. Recher, H.F. 1969. Bird species diversity and habitat diversity in Australia and North America. Amer. Nat. 103: 75–80.Google Scholar
  71. Reed, R.M. 1969. A study of forest vegetation in the Wind River Mountains, Wyoming. Ph.D. thesis, Wash. State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
  72. Richards, P.W. 1952. The Tropical Rain Forest. Cambridge Univ. Press. 450 pp.Google Scholar
  73. Risser, P.G. & E.L., Rice. 1971. Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forests. Ecology 52: 876–880.Google Scholar
  74. Root, R.B. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monogr. 37: 317–350.Google Scholar
  75. Sanders, H.L. 1969. Benthic marine diversity and the stability-time hypothesis. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22: 71–81.Google Scholar
  76. Shafi, M.I. & G.A., Yarranton. 1973. Diversity, floristic richness and species evenness during a secondary (post-fire) succession. Ecology 54: 897–902.Google Scholar
  77. Sirén, G. 1955. The development of spruce forest on raw humus sites in northern Finland and its ecology. Acta Forest. Fenn. 62(4): 1–363.Google Scholar
  78. Slobodkin, L.B. & H.L., Sanders. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22: 82–95.Google Scholar
  79. Swan, J.M.A. & R.L., Dix. 1966. The phytosociological structure of upland forest at Candle Lake, Saskatchewan. J. Ecol. 54: 13–40.Google Scholar
  80. Tagawa, H. 1964. A study of the volcanic vegetation in Sakurajima, Southwest Japan. I. Dynamics of vegetation. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. E. (Biol.) 3: 165–228.Google Scholar
  81. Taylor, D.L. 1973. Some ecological implications of forest fire control in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Ecology 54: 1394–1396.Google Scholar
  82. Terborgh, J. 1973. On the notion of favorableness in plant ecology. Amer. Nat. 107: 481–501.Google Scholar
  83. Weber, W.A. 1976. Rocky Mountain Flora. Fifth ed. Colorado Assted, University Press, Boulder 479 pp.Google Scholar
  84. Westman, W.E. & R.H., Whittaker. 1975. The pygmy forest region of northern California: studies on biomass and primary productivity. J. Ecol. 63: 493–520.Google Scholar
  85. Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1–80.Google Scholar
  86. Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.Google Scholar
  87. Whittaker, R.H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250–260.Google Scholar
  88. Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207–264.Google Scholar
  89. Whittaker, R.H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213–251.Google Scholar
  90. Whittaker, R.H. 1973. Direct gradient analysis. In: R.H., Whittaker (ed.), Ordination and Classification of Communities. Handbk. Veg. Sci. 5: 7–51. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  91. Whittaker, R.H. 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evol. Biol. (in press).Google Scholar
  92. Whittaker, R.H. & P.L., Marks. 1975. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: H., Lieth & R.H., Whittaker (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Ecol. Studies 14: 55–118. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  93. Whittaker, R.H. & W.A., Niering. 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46: 429–452.Google Scholar
  94. Whittaker, R.H. & W.A., Niering. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56: 771–790.Google Scholar
  95. Wikum, D.A. & M.K., Wali. 1974. Analysis of a North Dakota gallery forest: vegetation in relation to topographic and soil gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 441–464.Google Scholar
  96. Williard, B.E. 1963. Phytosociology of the alpine tundra of Trail Ridge, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Col., Boulder.Google Scholar
  97. Wirsing, J.M. 1973. Forest vegetation in southeastern Wyoming. M.S. thesis, Wash. State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
  98. Yoda, K. 1967. A preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal. II. General description, structure and floristic composition of the sample plots chosen from different vegetation zones. J. Coll. Arts Sci. Chiba Univ., Nat. Sci. Ser. 5: 99–140.Google Scholar
  99. Zobel, D.B., A., McKee, G.M., Hawk & C.T., Dyrness. 1976. Relationships of environment to composition, structure, and diversity of forest communities of the central western Cascades of Oregon. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 135–156.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert K. Peet
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations