Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 107–112 | Cite as

Seasonal succession of phytoplankton in a large subarctic river

  • James W. Moore
Article

Abstract

The factors influencing the abundance of phytoplankton in the Yellowknife River, in the Canadian subarctic, were determined from collections made for 42 consecutive months from June 1975 to November 1978. The spring bloom of plankton occured during April of each year in response to changing light conditions. WhileChlamydomonas lapponica was dominant during this period, it was replaced during the early part of the summer by a rapid succession ofDinobryon species in whichD. cylindricum was followed byD. sociale and in turn byD. bavaricum andD. divergens. Although low nutrient levels permitted the development ofDinobryon during the summer, the abundance of diatoms was greatly limited by the concentrations of SiO2 (< 0.1 g/m3). Algal densities began to decline in August and reached low overwintering levels by November. The absence of a fall bloom in densities was due to a combination of low temperatures and nutrient levels.

Keywords

Chlamydomonas Diatoms Dinobryon Light Nutrients Phytoplankton Subarctic Succession Temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bostrom, B. & Pettersson, K. 1977. The spring development of phytoplankton in Lake Erken. Freshwat. Biol. 7: 327–335.Google Scholar
  2. Duthie, H. C. & Ostrofsky, M. L. 1974. Plankton, chemistry and physics of lakes in the Churchill Falls region of Labrador. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31: 1105–1117.Google Scholar
  3. Findenegg, I. 1943. Untersuchungen über die Ökologie und die Produktionsverhältnisse des Planktons in in Karntner Seengebiete. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 43: 368–429.Google Scholar
  4. Guillard, R. R. L. 1973. Division rates. In: Handbook of phycological methods, Culture methods and growth measurements, J. R. Stein, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. pp. 289–311.Google Scholar
  5. Hilliard, D. K. & Asmund, B. 1963. Studies on Chrysophyceae from some ponds and lakes in Alaska. II. Notes on the genera Dinobryon, Hyalobryon and Epipyxis with descriptions of new species. Hydrobiologia 22: 331–397.Google Scholar
  6. Hutchinson, G. E. 1944. Limnological studies in Connecticut. VIII. A critical examination of the supposed relationship between phytoplankton periodicity and chemical changes in lake waters. Ecology 25: 3–26.Google Scholar
  7. Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A treatise on limnology, Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Kairesalo, T. 1977. On the production ecology of epipelic algae and littoral plankton communities in Lake Pääjärvi, southern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici 14: 82–88.Google Scholar
  9. Kalff, J. & Welch, H. E. 1974. Phytoplankton production in Char Lake, a natural polar lake, and in Meretta Lake, a polluted polar lake, Cornwallis Island, Northwest Territories. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31: 621–636.Google Scholar
  10. Lehman, J. T. 1976. Ecological and nutritional studies on Dinobryon Ehrenb.: Seasonal periodicity and the phosphate toxicity problem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 646–658.Google Scholar
  11. Lively, J. P. 1974. Analytical methods manual. Inland Waters Directorate, Water Quality Branch, Environment Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, J. V. 1978. Distribution and abundance of phytoplankton in 153 lakes, rivers and pools in the Northwest Territories. Can. J. Bot. 56: 1765–1773.Google Scholar
  13. Nauwerck, A. 1963. Die Beziehungen zwischen Zooplankton und Phytoplankton im See Erken. Symb. bot. Upsal. 17: 1–163.Google Scholar
  14. Ruttner, F. 1930. Das Plankton des Lunzer Untersees seine Verteilung in Raum und Zeit während der Jahre 1908–1913. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 23: 1–138.Google Scholar
  15. Ruttner, F. 1937. Ökotypen mit verschiedener Vertikalverteilung im Plankton der Alpenseen. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 35: 7–34.Google Scholar
  16. Sheath, R. G. & Hellebust, J. A. 1978. Comparison of algae in the euplankton, tychoplankton, and periphyton of a tundra pond. Can. J. Bot. 56: 1472–1483.Google Scholar
  17. Sheath, R. G., Hellebust, J. A. & Sawa, T. 1975. The statspore of Dinobryon divergens Imhof: formation and germination in a subarctic lake. J. Phycol. 11: 131–138.Google Scholar
  18. Stankovic, S. 1960. The Balkan Lake Ohrid and its living world. Monographiae biol. 9: 1–357.Google Scholar
  19. Utermöhl, H. 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 9: 1–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Moore

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations