Advertisement

Genetica

, Volume 83, Issue 3, pp 189–194 | Cite as

Comparative cytogenetic studies in Sus verrucosus, Sus celebensis and Sus scrofa vittatus (Suidae, Mammalia)

  • A. A. Bosma
  • N. A. De Haan
  • R. A. Blouch
  • A. A. Macdonald
Article

Abstract

Chromosome studies on the Javan warty pig (Sus verrucosus), the Sulawesi warty pig (S. celebensis) and a subspecies of the wild boar, S. scrofa vittatus, have revealed diploid chromosome numbers of 38. The morphology and C-band size of chromosome 10 are different in S. verrucosus and the two other species. Both S. verrucosus and S. celebensis have a Y chromosome that is larger than the Y chromosome of domestic and wild S. scrofa, and is submetacentric rather than metacentric. There are differences between all three species in the G-banding pattern of the long arm of the Y chromosome. The presence of 2n=38 chromosomes in the Javan warty pig and the Sulawesi warty pig provides new strong evidence that the basic chromosome number in the genus Sus is 38. The differences in karyotype between these pigs (chromosome 10 and the Y chromosome) confirm that they are separate species.

Keywords

Strong Evidence Chromosome Number Wild Boar Cytogenetic Study Separate Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blouch R. A., 1988. Ecology and conservation of the Javan warty pig Sus verrucosus Müller, 1840. Biol. Conserv. 43: 295–307.Google Scholar
  2. Blouch R. A., Banjar Y. L., Heri D. S. & Sumaryoto A., 1983. The Javan warty pig; distribution, status, and prospects for the future. World Wildlife Fund, Bogor.Google Scholar
  3. Bosma, A. A., de Haan, N. A. & Macdonald, A. A., 1984. Karyotype variability in the wild boar (Sus scrofa). In ‘Symposium International sur le Sanglier’ (eds. F. Spitz and D. Pepin). Les Colloques de l'INRA No. 22: 53–56.Google Scholar
  4. Bosma A. A., Oliver W. L. R. & Macdonald A. A., 1983. The karyotype, including G-and C-banding patterns, of the pigmy hog Sus (Porcula) salvanius (Suidae, Mammalia). Genetica 61: 99–106.Google Scholar
  5. Committee for the Standardized Karyotype of the Domestic Pig, 1988. Standard karyotype of the domestic pig. Hereditas 109: 151–157.Google Scholar
  6. Ford C. E., Pollock D. L. & Gustavsson I., 1980. Proceedings of the first international conference for the standardisation of banded karyotypes of domestic animals. University of Reading, Reading, England, 2nd-6th August 1976. Hereditas 92: 145–162.Google Scholar
  7. Groves, C., 1981. Ancestors for the pigs: taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Sus. Techn. Bull. No. 3, Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  8. Hageltorn M. & Gustavsson I., 1973. Giemsa staining patterns for identification of the pig mitotic chromosomes. Hereditas 75: 144–146.Google Scholar
  9. Honacki J. H., Kinman K. E. & Koeppl J. W. (eds.), 1982. Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference. Allen Press and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  10. Lotsy J. P., 1922. Die Autarbeitung des Kühn'schen Kreuzungsmaterials im Institut für Tierzucht der Unversität Halle. Genetica 4: 32–61.Google Scholar
  11. Mohr E., 1960. Wilde Schweine (Neue Brehm-BüchereiNo. 247). Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt.Google Scholar
  12. Muramoto J., Makino S., Ishikawa T. & Kanagawa H., 1965. On the chromosomes of the wild boar and the boar-pig hybrids. Proc. Japan Acad. 41: 236–239.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council, 1983. Little-known Asian animals with a promising economic future. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Okmoto A., Shiobara H., Tomita T. & Ohmi H., 1980. Chromosome studies of the wild boar and Ohmini pigs. Bull. Coll. Agric. Utsunomiya University 11: 1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Schwarz E., 1914. Säugetiere von Timor. In ‘Zoologie von Timorrd (ed. C. B. Haniel) Vol. 2: 113–135. Schweizerbart Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  16. Sumner A. T., 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exptl. Cell Res. 75: 304–306.Google Scholar
  17. Zivkovic S., Jovanovic V., Isakovic I. & Milosevic M., 1971. Chromosome complement of the European wild pig (Sus scrofa L.). Experientia 27: 224–226.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Bosma
    • 1
  • N. A. De Haan
    • 1
  • R. A. Blouch
    • 2
  • A. A. Macdonald
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological ParkConservation and Research CenterFront RoyalU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of Preclinical Veterinary SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, U.K.

Personalised recommendations