An approach to evolving novel organizational forms

  • Kevin Crowston


A key problem in organization theory is to suggest new organizational forms. In this paper, I suggest the use of genetic algorithms to search for novel organizational forms by reproducing some of the mechanics of organizational evolution. Issues in using genetic algorithms include identification of the unit of selection, development of a representation and determination of a method for calculating organizational fitness. As an example of the approach, I test a proposition of Thompson's about how interdependent positions should be assigned to groups. Representing an organization as a collection of routines might be more general and still amenable to evolution with a genetic algorithm. I conclude by discussing possible objections to the application of this technique.

Key words

genetic algorithms organizational form organizational structure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AxelrodR. (1987), “The Evolution of Strategies in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma” in L.Davis (ed.),Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing, London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  2. BeanJ. (1994), “Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization,”ORSA Journal on Computing, 6(2), 154–160.Google Scholar
  3. Booker, L.B., D.E. Goldberg, and J.H. Holland (1987),Classifier Systems and Genetic Algorithms, (Technical Report No. 8), CSMIL, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  4. BurtonR.M. and B.Obel (1980), “A Computer Simulation Test of the M-Form Hypothesis,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 457–466.Google Scholar
  5. CarrollG.R. (1984), “Organizational Ecology,”Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 71–93.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, G.R. and J.R. Harrison (1992),Chance and Rationality in Organizational Evolution, (unpublished manuscript), University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Crowston, K. (in press), “A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design,”Organizational Science.Google Scholar
  8. DavisL. (ed.) (1991),Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  9. DiMaggioP. and W.Powell (1983) “Institutional Isomorphism,”American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
  10. FreemanJ. and M.T.Hannan (1983), “Niche Width and the Dynamics of Organizational Change,”American Journal of Sociology, 88, 116–145.Google Scholar
  11. FriedmanL.W. and H.H.Friedman (1995), “Analyzing Simulation Output Using the Bootstrap Method,”Simulation, 64(2), 95–100.Google Scholar
  12. GrefenstetteJ.J. (1991), “Strategy Acquisition with Genetic Algorithms,” in L.Davis (ed.),Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, (pp. 186–201), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  13. HannanM.T. and J.Freeman (1986), “Where do Organizational Forms Come From?”Sociological Forum, 1(1), 50–72.Google Scholar
  14. HollandJ.H. (1992),Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, (2nd ed.), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  15. KozaJ.R. (1992),Genetic Programming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. LiepinsG.E. And W.D.Potter (1991), “A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Multiple-Fault Diagnosis,” in L.Davis (ed.),Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, (pp. 237–250), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  17. MaloneT.W. (1987), “Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets,”Management Science, 33, 1317–1332.Google Scholar
  18. McKelveyB. (1982),Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  19. MichalewiczZ. (1992),Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. NelsonR.R. and S.G.Winter (1982),An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
  21. PentlandB.T. (1992), “Organizing Moves in Software Support Hotlines,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 527–548.Google Scholar
  22. RomanelliE. (1991), “The Evolution of New Organizational Forms,”Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 79–103.Google Scholar
  23. SinghJ.V. and C.J.Lumsden (1990), “Theory and Research in Organization Ecology,”Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 161–193.Google Scholar
  24. StinchcombeA.L. (1965), “Social Structure and Organizations,” in J.G.March (ed.),Handbook of Organizations, (pp. 153–193), Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  25. ThompsonJ.D. (1967),Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. WilliamsonO.E. (1975),Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. WinterS.G. (1990), “Survival, Selection and Inheritance in Evolutionary Theories of Organizations,” in J.V.Singh (ed.),Organizational Evolution: New Directions, (pp. 269–297), Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. WongM.L. and K.S.Leung (1995), “Inducing Logic Programs with Genetic Algorithms: The Genetic Logic Programming Systems,”IEEE Expert, 10(5), 68–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Crowston

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations