The conformational preferences of γ-lactam and its role in constraining peptide structure
- 62 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Summary
The conformational constraints imposed by γ-lactams in peptides have been studied using valence force field energy calculations and flexible geometry maps. It has been found that while cyclisation restrains the Ψ of the lactam, non-bonded interactions contribute to the constraints on ϕ of the lactam. The γ-lactam also affects the (ϕ,Ψ) of the residue after it in a peptide sequence. For an l-lactam, the ring geometry restricts Ψ to about-120°, and ϕ has two minima, the lowest energy around-140° and a higher minimum (5 kcal/mol higher) at 60°, making an l-γ-lactam more favourably accommodated in a near extended conformation than in position 2 of a type II′ β-turn. The energy of the ϕ∼+60° minimum can be lowered substantially until it is more favoured than the-140° minimum by progressive substitution of bulkier groups on the amide N of the l-γ-lactam. The (ϕ,Ψ) maps of the residue succeeding a γ-lactam show subtle differences from those of standard N-methylated residues. The dependence of the constraints on the chirality of γ-lactams and N-substituted γ-lactams, in terms of the formation of secondary structures like β-turns is discussed and the comparison of the theoretical conformations with experimental results is highlighted.
Key words
Chirality Energy calculations Flexible-geometry maps Interactive computer graphics N-Methylated γ-lactams β-TurnsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Toniolo, C., Biopolymers, 28 (1989) 247.Google Scholar
- 2.Hruby, V.J., Life Sci., 31 (3) (1982) 189.Google Scholar
- 3.Freidinger, R.M., Veber, D.F., Perlow, D.S., Brooks, J.R. and Saperstein, R., Science, (210 1980) 656.Google Scholar
- 4.Freidinger, R.M., Veber, D.F., Hirschmann, R. and Paege, L.M., Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res., 16 (1980) 464.Google Scholar
- 5.Freidinger, R.M., Perlow, D.S. and Veber, D.F., J. Org. Chem., 47 (1982) 104.Google Scholar
- 6.Thaisrivongs, S., Pals, D.T., Turner, S.R. and Kroll, L.T., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 1369.Google Scholar
- 7.Yu, K.L., Rajakumar, G., Srivastava, L.K., Mishra, R.K. and Johnson, R.L., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 1430.Google Scholar
- 8.Mishra, R.K., Chiu, S., Chiu, P. and Mishra, C. P., Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 5 (1983) 203.Google Scholar
- 9.Freidinger, R.M., In Rich, D.H. and Gross, E. (Eds.) Peptides: Synthesis-Structure-Function (Proceedings of the 7th American Peptide Symposium), Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL., 1981, pp. 673–684.Google Scholar
- 10.Valle, G., Crisma, M., Toniolo, C., Yu, K.L. and Johnson, R.L., Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res., 33 (1989) 181.Google Scholar
- 11.Valle, G., Crisma, M., Toniolo, C., Yu, K.L. and Johnson, R.L., J. Chem. Soc. Perkins Trans. II (1989) 83.Google Scholar
- 12.Snyder, R.G. and Schachtschneider, J.H., Spectrochim. Acta, 19 (1963) 85.Google Scholar
- 13.Dauber, P., Goodman, M., Hagler, A.T., Osguthorpe, D.J., Sharon, R. and Stern, P.S., Proc. ACS Symp. on Supercomputers in Chemistry, 173 (1981) 161.Google Scholar
- 14.Dauber-Osguthorpe, P., Roberts, V.A., Osguthorpe, D.J., Wolff, J., Genest, M. and Hagler, A.T., Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 4 (1988) 31.Google Scholar
- 15.Paul, P.K.C., Osguthorpe, P.D., Campbell, M.M., Brown, D.W., Kinsman, R.G., Moss, C. and Osguthorpe, D.J., Biopolymers, 29 (1990) 623.Google Scholar
- 16.Ramachandran, G.N., Ramakrishnan, C. and Sasisekharan, V., J. Mol. Biol., 7 (1963) 95.Google Scholar
- 17.Zimmerman, S.S. and Scheraga, H.A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 74 (1977) 4126.Google Scholar
- 18.Stern, P.S., Chorev, M., Goodman, M. and Hagler, A.T., Biopolymers, 22 (1983) 1901.Google Scholar
- 19.Venkatachalam, C.M., Biopolymers, 6 (1968) 1425.Google Scholar
- 20.Rose, G.D., Gierasch, L.M. and Smith, J.A., Adv. Prot. Chem., 37 (1985) 1.Google Scholar
- 21.Chandrasekaran, R., Lakshminarayanan, A.V., Pandya, U.V. and Ramachandran, G.N., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 303 (1973) 14.Google Scholar
- 22.Reed, L.L. and Johnson, P.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95 (1973) 7523.Google Scholar
- 23.Paul, P.K.C., Dauber-Osguthorpe, P., Campbell, M.M. and Osguthorpe, D.J., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 165 (1989) 1051.Google Scholar