Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 239–253 | Cite as

The conformational preferences of γ-lactam and its role in constraining peptide structure

  • P. K. C. Paul
  • P. A. Burney
  • M. M. Campbell
  • D. J. Osguthorpe
Research Papers

Summary

The conformational constraints imposed by γ-lactams in peptides have been studied using valence force field energy calculations and flexible geometry maps. It has been found that while cyclisation restrains the Ψ of the lactam, non-bonded interactions contribute to the constraints on ϕ of the lactam. The γ-lactam also affects the (ϕ,Ψ) of the residue after it in a peptide sequence. For an l-lactam, the ring geometry restricts Ψ to about-120°, and ϕ has two minima, the lowest energy around-140° and a higher minimum (5 kcal/mol higher) at 60°, making an l-γ-lactam more favourably accommodated in a near extended conformation than in position 2 of a type II′ β-turn. The energy of the ϕ∼+60° minimum can be lowered substantially until it is more favoured than the-140° minimum by progressive substitution of bulkier groups on the amide N of the l-γ-lactam. The (ϕ,Ψ) maps of the residue succeeding a γ-lactam show subtle differences from those of standard N-methylated residues. The dependence of the constraints on the chirality of γ-lactams and N-substituted γ-lactams, in terms of the formation of secondary structures like β-turns is discussed and the comparison of the theoretical conformations with experimental results is highlighted.

Key words

Chirality Energy calculations Flexible-geometry maps Interactive computer graphics N-Methylated γ-lactams β-Turns 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Toniolo, C., Biopolymers, 28 (1989) 247.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hruby, V.J., Life Sci., 31 (3) (1982) 189.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freidinger, R.M., Veber, D.F., Perlow, D.S., Brooks, J.R. and Saperstein, R., Science, (210 1980) 656.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freidinger, R.M., Veber, D.F., Hirschmann, R. and Paege, L.M., Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res., 16 (1980) 464.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freidinger, R.M., Perlow, D.S. and Veber, D.F., J. Org. Chem., 47 (1982) 104.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thaisrivongs, S., Pals, D.T., Turner, S.R. and Kroll, L.T., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 1369.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu, K.L., Rajakumar, G., Srivastava, L.K., Mishra, R.K. and Johnson, R.L., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 1430.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mishra, R.K., Chiu, S., Chiu, P. and Mishra, C. P., Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 5 (1983) 203.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freidinger, R.M., In Rich, D.H. and Gross, E. (Eds.) Peptides: Synthesis-Structure-Function (Proceedings of the 7th American Peptide Symposium), Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL., 1981, pp. 673–684.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valle, G., Crisma, M., Toniolo, C., Yu, K.L. and Johnson, R.L., Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res., 33 (1989) 181.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valle, G., Crisma, M., Toniolo, C., Yu, K.L. and Johnson, R.L., J. Chem. Soc. Perkins Trans. II (1989) 83.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snyder, R.G. and Schachtschneider, J.H., Spectrochim. Acta, 19 (1963) 85.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dauber, P., Goodman, M., Hagler, A.T., Osguthorpe, D.J., Sharon, R. and Stern, P.S., Proc. ACS Symp. on Supercomputers in Chemistry, 173 (1981) 161.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dauber-Osguthorpe, P., Roberts, V.A., Osguthorpe, D.J., Wolff, J., Genest, M. and Hagler, A.T., Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 4 (1988) 31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paul, P.K.C., Osguthorpe, P.D., Campbell, M.M., Brown, D.W., Kinsman, R.G., Moss, C. and Osguthorpe, D.J., Biopolymers, 29 (1990) 623.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramachandran, G.N., Ramakrishnan, C. and Sasisekharan, V., J. Mol. Biol., 7 (1963) 95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimmerman, S.S. and Scheraga, H.A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 74 (1977) 4126.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stern, P.S., Chorev, M., Goodman, M. and Hagler, A.T., Biopolymers, 22 (1983) 1901.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Venkatachalam, C.M., Biopolymers, 6 (1968) 1425.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rose, G.D., Gierasch, L.M. and Smith, J.A., Adv. Prot. Chem., 37 (1985) 1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chandrasekaran, R., Lakshminarayanan, A.V., Pandya, U.V. and Ramachandran, G.N., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 303 (1973) 14.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reed, L.L. and Johnson, P.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95 (1973) 7523.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paul, P.K.C., Dauber-Osguthorpe, P., Campbell, M.M. and Osguthorpe, D.J., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 165 (1989) 1051.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ESCOM Science Publishers B.V 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. C. Paul
    • 1
  • P. A. Burney
    • 1
  • M. M. Campbell
    • 1
  • D. J. Osguthorpe
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Graphics UnitUniversity of BathBathU.K.

Personalised recommendations