Vegetatio

, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 21–32 | Cite as

Regional interpretation of environmental gradients which influence Trachypogon savannas in the Orinoco Llanos

  • J. J. San Jose
  • R. Montes
Article

Abstract

Multivariate structural data describing Trachypogon savanna relationships were used to characterize the sources of variation among savannas as a function of the environmental characteristics of the Orinoco Llanos. Twenty-six savannas including major physiognomic types of the Orinoco Llanos ranging from herbaceous to bush island savannas were ordinated on a regional scale. Results of Detrented Canonical Correspondence Analysis (DCCA) using floristics variables indicated that savannas were ordinated along two complex gradients. A soil physical and chemical gradient as expressed by changes in bulk density and magnesium concentration were evident after the analysis of the first DCCA axis. The second axis was a climatic gradient of decreasing annual precipitation and incresing monthly precipitation during the dry season. The impact of human disturbance on the savanna composition was also an explanatory variable of the second DCCA axis. Savanna sites overlapped considerably in composition and most species were widely distributed, with aboveground phytomass abundance depending upon the site.

Keywords

Ecological factors Environmental gradients Multivariate analysis Ordination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, M. P. 1968. An ordination study of a chalk grassland community. J. Ecol. 56: 739–757.Google Scholar
  2. Blydenstein, J. 1962. La sabana de Trachypogon del Alto Llano. Bol. Soc. Ven. Cien. Nat. 23: 139–206.Google Scholar
  3. Bouxin, G. 1975. Ordination and classification in the savanna vegetation of the Akagera Park (Rwanda, Central Africa). Vegetatio 29: 155–167.Google Scholar
  4. Bremmer, J. M. 1965. Total nitrogen. In: Black, C.A. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. pp. 1149–1178. Amer. Soc. Agr. Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Bulla, L. 1986. Bases para el diseño de medidas de mitigaci\0on y control de las cuencas hidrogråficas de los rios Caris y Pao (Edo. Anzoategui). Capìtulo IV. Convenio U.C.V. Meneven. Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  6. Christian, C. S. & Stewart, G. A. 1952. General report on a survey of the Katherine-Darwin region, 1946. CSIRO Land Res. Ser. No. 1. Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Day, P. R. 1965. Particles fractionation and particle size analysis. In: Black, C. A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. pp. 545–567. Amer. Soc. Agr. Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Eiten, G. 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot. Rev. 38: 201–341.Google Scholar
  9. Fournet, J. & Monestriez, P. 1987. Essai de caracterisation phytoecologique des formations herbacees pasturees de Grande-Terre (Guadeloupe). Agronomie 7: 833–851.Google Scholar
  10. Goodall, D. W. 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot. 2: 304–324.Google Scholar
  11. Goodland, R. 1979. Analise ecologica da vegetacao do Cerrado. In: Goodland, R. & Ferri, M. G. (eds), Ecologia do Cerrado. pp. 61–193. Editora do Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  12. Hedberg, H. & Pyre, A. 1944. Stratigraphy of northeastern, Venezuela. Am. Ass. Petr. Geol. Bull. 28: 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Hernandez, J. R., Garcia-Miragaya, J. & San Jose, J. J. 1982. Repuesta del pastizal de las sabanas de Trachypogon a la aplicaci\0on de differentes combinaciones de macronutrientes. Bol. Soc. Ven. Cien. Nat. 140: 11–31. Hill, T.L. 1969. The savanna landscapes of the Amazon basin. McGill Univ. Savanna Res. Serie no 14.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, T. L. 1969. The savanna landscapes of the Amazon basin, McGill Univ. Savanna Res. Serie no 14.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.Google Scholar
  16. Hope, A. C. 1968. A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B 30: 582–598.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Jongman, R. H., Ter Braak, C. J. & Van Tongeren, O. F. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc. Wageningen The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  19. Kershaw, K. A. 1968. Classification and ordination of Nigerian savanna vegetation. J. Ecol. 56: 467–482.Google Scholar
  20. Lopes, A. S. & Cox, F. R. 1977. Cerrado vegetation in Brazil: An edaphic gradient. J. Agr. 69: 829–831.Google Scholar
  21. Lourido, J. A. 1983. Diferencias en la particion de la biomasa, nutrientes, diversidad y otras caracteristicas de la vegetation entre seis sabanas del Estado Guarico. Trabajo Especial de Grado, Escuela de Biologia, Universidad Central de Venezuela. Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  22. McNaughton, S. J. 1983. Serengeti grasslands ecology: The role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 291–320.Google Scholar
  23. Olsen, S. R. & Dean, L.A. 1965. Phosphorus. In: Black, C. A. (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis. pp. 1035–1049. Amer. Soc. Agro. Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  24. Orloci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd. ed. Dr. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague.Google Scholar
  25. Owyekwelu, S. S. & Okafor, J. C. 1979. Ordination of a savanna woodland in Nigeria using woody and herbaceous. Vegetatio 40: 95–100.Google Scholar
  26. Pemadasa, M. A. & Mueller-Dombois, E. 1979. An ordination study of montane grasslands of Sri Lanka. J. Ecol. 67: 1009–1023.Google Scholar
  27. Pla Sentis, J. 1977. Metodologìa para la caracterizacìon fisica con fines de diagn\0ostico de problemas de manejo y conservaci\0on de suelos en condiciones tropicales. Curso de Postgrado en Ciencias del Suelo. Facultad de Agronomìa, Universidad Central de Venezuela. Venezuela.Google Scholar
  28. Richards, L. A. 1949. Methods of measuring soil moisture tension. Soil Sci. 68: 95–112.Google Scholar
  29. Sanchez, P. 1986. Clasificaci\0on y ordenaci\0on de la comunidad herbåcea de la Estaci\0on Biol\0ogica de los Llanos, Edo. Guarico. Trabajo de Ascenso. Escuela de Biologìa, Universidad Central de Venezuela. Venezuela.Google Scholar
  30. San Jose, J. J. & Medina, E. 1975. Effects of fire on organic matter production and water balance in a tropical savanna. In: Golley, F. B. & Medina, E. (eds), Tropical Ecological Studies. pp. 151–164. 11, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  31. San Jose, J. J. & Medina, E. 1976. Organic matter production in the Trachypogon savanna at Calabozo, Venezuela. Trop. Ecol. 17: 113–124.Google Scholar
  32. San Jose, J. J., Montes, R., Garcia-Miragaya, J. & Orihuela, B. E. 1985. Bio-production of Trachypogon savannas in a latitudinal cross-section of the Orinoco Llanos, Venezuela. Acta OEcol. 6: 25–43.Google Scholar
  33. San Jose, J. J. & Montes, R. 1987. Estudio de la estructura y funcionamiento de comunidades naturales y cultivadas en altiplanicies. Proyecto CONICIT-SVCN. Fortalecimiento EBLL26. Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  34. Sarmiento, G. & Monasterio, M. 1969. Studies on the savanna vegetation of the Venezuelan Llanos. I. The use of association-analysis. J. Ecol. 57: 579–598.Google Scholar
  35. Silva, J. & Sarmiento, G. 1976. Influencia de factores edåficos en la diferenciaci\0on de las sabanas. Anålisis de Componentes Principales y su interpretaci\0on ecol\0ogica. Acta Cien. Ven. 27: 141–147.Google Scholar
  36. Technicon Auto Analyzer II, 1978. Individual/simultaneous determination of nitrogen and/or phosphorous in acid digests. In Industrial Methods Vo. 329–374. W/B, pp. 1–9. Technicon Industrial Systems Taurytown. New York.Google Scholar
  37. Ter Braak, C. J. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis Ecology. 67: 1167–1174.Google Scholar
  38. Ter Braak, C. J. 1988. CANOCO: A Fortran program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrented] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis. (version 2.1). Agricultural Mathematics Group. Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  39. Ter Braak, C. J. & Prentice, I. C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 272–313.Google Scholar
  40. Whittaker, R. H. 1973. Ordination and classification of communities. Part V. Dr W. Junk b.v. Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. San Jose
    • 1
  • R. Montes
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de EcologiaInstituto Venezolano de Investigaciones CientificasCaracasVenezuela
  2. 2.Departamento de Estudios AmbientalesUniversidad Simon BolivarCaracasVenezuela

Personalised recommendations