Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 3–14 | Cite as

Fertility and eugenics: Singapore's population policies

  • J. John Palen
Article

Abstract

Singapore, after serving for two decades as a model for Third World birth control and economic development programs, is now abandoning its earlier population policies in favor of encouraging dramatic population growth. The initial eugenics-based program introduced in 1984 sought increased fertility for university-educated women and provided major subsidies for the voluntary sterilization of poor and uneducated parents. These much publicized and internationally discussed programs have now been abandoned in favor of new population programs seeking to encourage fertility in lower as well as better educated groups. A forty percent population increase is being set as a goal. To accomplish this the effective Singapore Family Planning and Population Board has been abolished and Housing Development Board policies are in the process of being reversed to encourage rather than discourage fertility.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asiaweek (1984). ‘Breeding the Brightest’, Mar. 2: 24–25.Google Scholar
  2. Asiaweek (1984). ‘The Great Debate Over Genes’, Mar. 2: 26–58.Google Scholar
  3. Asiaweek (1984). ‘We're Bail-Bearings, Quality Controlled’, (interview with Toh Chin Chye, Vice-Chancellor (President) of University of Singapore 1968–75), Sept. 7.Google Scholar
  4. Bellows, Thomas (1983). ‘Big Fish, Small Pond’, Wilson Quarterly, Winter: 63-82.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, Iain (1972). Singapore in Southeast Asia. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Chee Heng Leng and Chan Chee Khoon (eds) (1984). Designer Genes; IQ, Ideology and Biology. Selangor, Malaysia: Institute for Social Analysis.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Peter and James Fawcett (eds) (1979). Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  8. Cochrane, S.H. (1979). Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crosette, Barbara (1984). ‘The Opulence of Singapore’ New York Times Magazine, Dec. 16: 122, 124, 142–148.Google Scholar
  10. Daily Telegraph (1984). Quoting H.J. Eysenck, London, Jan. 23.Google Scholar
  11. David, H.P. and R.J. McIntyre (1981). Reproductive Behavior: Central and Eastern European Experience. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Genetic Diversity and Human Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, B. and B. Waites (1981). IQ and Mental Testing. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Eysenck, H.J. versus L. Kamin (1981). Intelligence: The Battle for the Mind. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, S.J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Henderson, Norman D. (1982). ‘Human Behavior Genetics’, Annual Review of Psychology 33: 403–440.Google Scholar
  17. Housing and Development Board Annual Report 1984/85 (1985). Singapore.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, Arthur R. (1969). ‘How Much We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement’, Havard Educational Review 39: 1–123.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, Arthur R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kamin, Leon J. (1984). Not In Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kevles, Daniel J. (1985). In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  22. Liu Thai-Ker (1982). ‘A Review of Public Housing in Singapore’, in S. Jaykumar (ed), Our Heritage and Beyond. Singapore: NTUC.Google Scholar
  23. London Daily Telegraph (1984). ‘Singapore Breeds Intelligence’, London, Jan. 23.Google Scholar
  24. Nation Review, ‘Singapore Pays Women Not to Have Babies’, Bangkok, June 7, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. Parmer, J. Norman ‘City of the Lion’, Wilson Quarterly, Winter: 49–65.Google Scholar
  26. Salaff, Janet W. (1985). ‘Family Size Intentions and Socioeconomic Status in Singapore 1974–1981’, Studies in Family Planning 16: 199–210.Google Scholar
  27. Saw Swee Hock (1980). Population Control for Zero Growth in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Singapore Family Planning and Population Board (1983). Population Projects for Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  29. Singapore Monitor (1983). ‘A Mother's Influence is Greater’, Singapore, Sept. 5.Google Scholar
  30. Singapore Monitor (1984). ‘The Singaporeans Who Place Self Before Nation’, Singapore, Feb. 10.Google Scholar
  31. Singapore Monitor (1984). ‘Jeya and Chiam Win’, Singapore, Dec. 23.Google Scholar
  32. Social Development Unit (1985). Information Bulletin. Singapore: Ministry of Finance. June.Google Scholar
  33. Social Development Commission (no date). Sharing a Life-Time. Google Scholar
  34. Straits Times (1983). ‘Lop-sided Birth Rate Drop’, ‘80pc Nature and 20pc Nurture’, and ‘Talent for the Future’, Singapore, Aug. 15.Google Scholar
  35. Straits Times (1983). ‘You Can't Succeed in Both Career and Marriage’, Singapore, Aug. 16.Google Scholar
  36. Straits Times (1983). ‘Making of Dull and Bright Children’, Singapore, Sept. 9.Google Scholar
  37. Straits Times (1983). ‘When Graduate Doesn't Marry Graduate’, Singapore, Sept. 5.Google Scholar
  38. Straits Times (1983). ‘Economy Strong’, Singapore, Nov. 21.Google Scholar
  39. Straits Times (1984). ‘Grad Mums Are Best’, Singapore, Jan. 11.Google Scholar
  40. Straits Times (1984). P.M. Lee's speech, ‘Of Group Survival and Leadership’, Singapore, Sept. 3.Google Scholar
  41. Straits Times (1985). ‘Time To Educate a New Generation’, P.M. Singapore, March 2.Google Scholar
  42. Straits Times (1985). ‘When the House Sat and Talked of Love... ’, Singapore, March 7.Google Scholar
  43. Straits Times (1985). ‘Graduate Mum Scheme to Go’, Singapore, March 26.Google Scholar
  44. Tan Siok Bie, James Lee and S.S. Batnam (1979). ‘Effects of Disincentives About Pregnancy and Abortion’, in Peter Chen and James Fawcett (eds), Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  45. U.S. News and World Report (1984). ‘Singapore Proves Asian Work Ethic Pays Rich Rewards’, Aug. 20, 49-50.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wong, Aline and Janet Salaff (1979). ‘Planning Births for a Better Life: Working Class Response to Population Disincentive’, in Peter Chen and James Fawcett (eds), Public Policy and Population Change. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  48. Yee, Stephen (1975). Public Housing in Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. John Palen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations