Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 47–67 | Cite as

Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap

  • Solomon William Polachek
Article

Abstract

The role of occupational segregation in the determination of gender wage differentials is assessed. It is found (1) that occupational segregation plays less of a role in explaining wage differentials than do traditional human capital variables; (2) that earnings profiles generated with data that include a percent female (PF) measure of occupational segregation are not ideal for testing human capital predictions yet nonetheless yield parameters consistent with neoclassical theory; and (3) that lifetime work considerations, such as the degree of one's labor force intermittency, are important in determining both one's occupation and wage. The implications are that government antidiscrimination policies based on outcome measures are in general inefficient. Instead, the government should concentrate on creating incentives for women to participate in the labor market on an equal basis as males.

Keywords

Human Capital Wage Differential Neoclassical Theory Equal Basis Occupational Segregation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beller, A. (1982). “Occupational segregation by sex: determinants and changes”, Journal of Human Resources 17: 371–392.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, R. and J. Heckman (1977). “The impact of government on the labor market status of black americans: a critical review” in F. Block (ed.), Equal Rights and Industrial Relations. Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  3. Chiswick, B., J. Fackler, J. O'Neill and S. Polachek (1974). “The effect of occupation on race and sex differences in hourly earnings”, American Statistical Association Proceedings 219–228.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D. (1982). “How durable is a woman's human capital: an interoccupational study”, Washington University mimeo.Google Scholar
  5. Edgeworth, F.Y. (1922). “Equal pay to men and women”, Economic Journal 32: 431–457.Google Scholar
  6. England, P. (1982). “The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation”, Journal of Human Resources 17: 358–370.Google Scholar
  7. England, P. (1985). “Occupational segregation rejoinder to Polachek”, Journal of Human Resources 20: 441–443.Google Scholar
  8. England, P., G. Farkas, and T. Dou (1986). “Explaining occupational sex seregation and wages: findings from a model of fixed effects”, mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Filer, R. (1983). “Sexual differences in earnings: the role of individual personalities and tastes”, Journal of Human Resources 18: 82–99.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, V. (1971). “Differentials in hourly earnings between men and women”, Monthly Labor Review 94: 9–15.Google Scholar
  11. Goldin, C. (1986). “Monitoring costs and occupational segregation by sex: a historical analysis”, Journal of Labor Economics 4: 1–27.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, J. (1972). Econometric Method. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
  13. Landes, E. (1977). “Sex differences in wages and employment: a test of the specific capital hypothesis”, Economic Inquiry 15: 523–38.Google Scholar
  14. McDowell, J. (1982). “An analysis of the durability of knowledge concerning science and economics”, Arizona State University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Oppenheimer, V. (1981). “Occupational segregation: an eclectic perspective”, Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Conerence, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Polachek, S. (1978). “Sex differences in college major”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 31: 498–508.Google Scholar
  17. Polachek, S. (1979a). “Simultaneous equations models of sex discrimination”, in J.R. Moroney (ed.), Income Inequality: Trends and International Comparisons. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  18. Polachek, S. (1979b). “Occupational segregation among women: theory, evidence and a prognosis”, in C. Lloyd et al. (eds.), Women in the Labor Market. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Polachek, S. (1981). “Occupational self-selection: a human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure”, Review of Economics and Statistics 63: 60–69.Google Scholar
  20. Polachek, S. (1984). “Women in the economy: perspectives on gender inequality”, in Comparable Worth: Issue of the 80s, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Civil Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  21. Polachek, S. (1985a). “Occupational segregation: a defense of human capital predictions”, Journal of Human Resources 20: 437–440.Google Scholar
  22. Polachek S. (1985b). “Occupational segregation: reply to England”, Journal of Human Resources 20: 444.Google Scholar
  23. Rathbone, E.J. (1917). “The remuneration of women's services”, Economic Journal 27: 55–68.Google Scholar
  24. Roose, P. (1981). “Marital differences in occupational distribution and attainment”, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of American, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Sandell, S. and S. Shapiro (1980). “Work expectations, human capital accumulation, and the wages of young women”, Journal of Human Resources 15: 335–353.Google Scholar
  26. Theil, H. (1969). “Multinominal extension of the linear logit model”, International Economic Review 10: 251–259.Google Scholar
  27. Treiman, D. and H. Hartmann (eds.) (1981). Women, Work and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  28. Waite, L. and S. Berryman (1985). “Women in nontraditional occupations: choice and turnover”, Rand Report R-3106-FF.Google Scholar
  29. Zalokar, N. (1982). “Male female differences in occupational choice and the demand for general and occupational specific human capital”, mimeo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (Kluwer) 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Solomon William Polachek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsState University of New YorkBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations