In this paper, an attempt has been made to reexamine the effect of budget deficits in the United States on interest rates. Unlike the previous studies which use only one definition of the dependent variable, we have used all three, namely, the nominal and the ex-post and the ex-ante real interest rate. Further, unlike previous studies, we considered both short-term and long-term interest rates. Our results provide absolutely no support for the proposition that federal deficits affect interest rates and thus contradict the recent findings by Cebula (1987) and Kolluri and Giannaros (1987). Finally, the paper provides some further support for the ‘inverted’ Fisher hypothesis proposed by Carmichael and Stebbing (1983).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Carmichael, J., and Stebbing, P.W. (1983). Fisher's paradox and the theory of interest rate. The American Economic Review 73(May): 619–630.Google Scholar
- Cebula, R.J. (1987). Federal deficits and the real rate of interest in the United States: A note. Public Choice 53(1): 97–100.Google Scholar
- Evans, P. (1985). Do large deficits produce high interest rates? The American Economic Review 75(March): 68–87.Google Scholar
- Evans, P. (1987). Do budget deficits raise nominal interest rate? Evidence from six countries. Journal of Monetary Economics 20(September): 381.Google Scholar
- Hoelscher, G.P. (1983). Federal borrowing and short-term interest rates. Southern Economic Journal (October): 319–333.Google Scholar
- Kolluri, B.R. and Giannaros, D.S. (1987). Budget deficits and short-term interest rate forecasting. Journal of Macroeconomics 9(Winter): 109–126.Google Scholar
- Makin, J.H. (1983). Real interest rate, money surprises, anticipated inflation and fiscal deficits. The Review of Economics and Statistics 65(August): 374–384.Google Scholar
- Motley, B. (1983). Real interest rate, money and government deficits. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Economic Review (Summer): 31–45.Google Scholar