Genetica

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 11–20 | Cite as

Genetic variation in a semi-natural Drosophila population after a bottleneck I. Lethals, their allelism and effective population size

  • M. Begon
  • R. Chadburn
  • J. A. Bishop
  • C. Keill
Article

Abstract

A semi-natural Drosophila melanogaster population was twice forced through a genetic bottleneck and allowed to recover naturally. In one case additional variation was introduced to the recovering population. The percentage of lethal chromosomes, the level of allelism between these lethals, and the effective population size calculated from the allelism of these lethals all rose sharply in the few generations following each bottleneck, though this was not the case in the very first generation. Thereafter this rise decelerated rapidly and never returned to pre-bottleneck levels. Additional introduced variation had little effect. The reasons for and implications of this pattern have been considered.

Keywords

Genetic Variation Population Size Additional Variation Effective Population Effective Population Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, W. W., 1969. Genetics of natural populations. XLI. The selection coefficients of heterozygotes for lethal chromosomes in Drosophila on different genetic backgrounds. Genetics 62: 827–836.Google Scholar
  2. Begon, M., 1977. The effective size of a natural Drosophila subobscura population. Heredity 38: 13–18.Google Scholar
  3. Begon, M., Chadburn, R. & Bishop, J. A., 1984a. The effects of different levels of genetic variation on the population ecology of a semi-natural Drosophila population. In preparation.Google Scholar
  4. Begon, M., Chadburn, R., Bishop, J. A. & Keill, C., 1984b. Genetic structure of a semi-natural Drosophila melanogaster population after a bottleneck: the relative fitnesses of second chromosomes. Genetica (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Begon, M., Krimbas, C. B. & Loukas, M., 1980. The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XV. Effective size of a natural population estimated by three independent methods. Heredity 45: 335–350.Google Scholar
  6. David, F. N. & Johnson, N. L., 1952. The truncated Poisson. Biometrics 8: 275–285.Google Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky, Th., 1946. Genetics of natural populations. XIII. Recombination and variability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 31: 269–290.Google Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky, Th., Levene, H., Spassky, B. & Spassky, N., 1959. Release of genetic variability through recombination. III. Drosophila prosaltans. Genetics 44: 75–92.Google Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky, Th. & Spassky, B., 1968. Genetics of natural populations. XL. Heterotic and deleterious effects of recessive lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 59: 411–425.Google Scholar
  10. Dobzhansky, Th. & Wright, S., 1941. Genetics of natural populations. V. Relations between mutation rate and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 26: 23–51.Google Scholar
  11. Greenwood, J. J. D., 1974. Effective population numbers in the snail Cepaea nemoralis. Evolution 28: 513–526.Google Scholar
  12. Karlik, A. & Feuerbach-Mravlag, H., 1977. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. III. EMS induced lethal mutations in homo- and heterozygous populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 47: 87–92.Google Scholar
  13. Loukas, M., Krimbas, C. B. & Sourdis, J., 1980. The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XIII. A study of lethal allelism. Genetica 54: 197–207.Google Scholar
  14. Prout, T., 1954. Genetic drift in irradiated experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 39: 529–545.Google Scholar
  15. Spassky, B., Spassky, N., Levene, H. & Dobzhansky, Th., 1958. Release of genetic variability through recombination. I. Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 43: 844–867.Google Scholar
  16. Sperlich, D. & Karlik, A., 1970. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. I. The fate of alien chromosomes. Genetica 41: 265–304.Google Scholar
  17. Sperlich, D. & Karlik, A., 1972. The genetic conditions in heterozygous and homozygous populations of Drosophila. II. X-ray induced lethals in a homozygous and a heterozygous population. Genetica 43: 443–452.Google Scholar
  18. Spiess, E. B., 1959. Release of genetic variability through recombination. II. Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 44: 43–58.Google Scholar
  19. Spiess, E. B. & Allen, A. C., 1961. Release of genetic variability through recombination. VII. Second and third chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 46: 1531–1553.Google Scholar
  20. Sved, J. A. & Ayala, F. J., 1970. A population cage test for heterosis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 66: 97–113.Google Scholar
  21. Wallace, B., 1951. Genetic changes within populations after X-irradiation. Genetics 36: 612–628.Google Scholar
  22. Wallace, B., 1956. Studies on irradiated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genetics 54: 280–293.Google Scholar
  23. Wright, S., 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.Google Scholar
  24. Wright, S., 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87: 430–431.Google Scholar
  25. Wright, S., Dobzhansky, Th. & Hovanitz, W., 1942. Genetics of natural populations. VII. The allelism of lethals in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 27: 363–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Begon
    • 1
  • R. Chadburn
    • 2
  • J. A. Bishop
    • 2
  • C. Keill
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyThe University of LiverpoolLiverpoolU.K.
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsThe University of LiverpoolLiverpoolU.K.

Personalised recommendations