Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 173–185 | Cite as

Avoiding edge effects in agroforestry experiments; the use of neighbour-balanced designs and guard areas

  • S. Langton
Article

Abstract

A number of different types of edge effects on experimental plots are defined, and it is shown that they are frequently important in agroforestry experiments. Methods of eliminating edge effects, either at the design or the analysis stage, are described. Computer simulations, based on uniformity data, are used to investigate the efficacy of neighbour-balanced designs, with and without neighbour terms, for reducing the problem of neighbour effects between different treatments. It is concluded that, while neighbour-balanced designs may be useful in certain situations or in combination with other methods, it is preferable to eliminate edge effects by using adequate guard rows. Recommendations are therefore made concerning the correct use of guard areas in agroforestry experimentation.

Key words

Agroforestry experiments edge effects neighbour-balanced designs statistical analysis guard areas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey RA (1984). Quasi-complete Latin Squares: construction and randomization. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 46: 323–334Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhali, MA, Day AD, Tucker Henry, Thomson RK and Massey GD (1964) End-border effects in irrigated barley yield trials. Agronomy Journal 56: 346–348Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dyke GV (1988) Comparative experiments with field crops. 2nd Edition. Charles Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyke GV and Shelley CF (1976) Serial designs balanced for effects of neighbours on both sides. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 303–305Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haines WB, Crowther EM and Thornton GJ (1954) Manuring Hevea V: some long-term effects in the Dunlop (Malaya) experiments. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 22: 203–210Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holstener-Joergensen H and Kromann H (1975) Edge effects in fertilizer experiments with 77-year old Norway Spruce in Gludsted plantation and with 83-year old Norway Spruce in Borbjerg plantation. Forstlige Forsoegsvaesen i Danmark 34: 279–292Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen NF and Federer WT (1964) Adjacent row competition in wheat. Crop Science 4: 641–645Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempton RA and Howes CW (1981) The use of neighbouring plot values in the analysis of variety trials. Applied Statistics 30: 59–70Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lockwood G and Martin KJ (1976) The use of whole plot data from progeny trials with cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in Ghana. Journal of Horticultural Science 51: 353–358Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McDonald GE and Peck NH (1976) Border effect in a long term fertility experiment. Agronomy Journal 68: 530–532Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearce SC, Clarke GM, Dyke GV and Kempson RE (1988) A Manual of Crop Experimentation. Charles Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Street AP and Street DJ (1987) Combinatorics of Experimental Design. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tolhurst JAH (1977) The role of guard rows in field experiments. Tea in East Africa 17: 23–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vernon AJ (1968) Edge effects in a cocoa shade and manurial experiment. Journal of Horticultural Science 43: 147–152Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Langton
    • 1
  1. 1.Statistics Departmentt, AFRC Institute for Arable Crops ResearchRothamsted Experimental StationHarpendenUK

Personalised recommendations