Untersuchungen über polygene suppressor-wirkungen auf semiletalfaktoren des X-chromosoms von Drosophila melanogaster
- 16 Downloads
Abstract
Six different X-chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster carrying a semilethal factor were introduced into an attached-X-strain. Since in such a strain the X-chromosomes of fathers are transmitted to sons this has resulted in a reduced number of male offsprings. After a few generations, however, the viability of the males has increased in almost all cases. Excluding the possibility of backmutations on the semilethal locus the assumption was made that the reduction of semilethality was due to epistatic gene interaction. By backcrossing males of the improved lines to attached-X-females of the original strain the viability of males decreased slightly without reaching the initial values of the experiments. From these and other observations it was assumed that both interaction between genes of the autosomes and interaction between new spontaneous mutant genes and the semilethal genes were active in determining the viability of the males. Intrachromosomal interactions, however, seem to be more important than interchromosomal interactions. The gene action is determined by its genetic background and, with respect to the problem of the genetic load, this has to be taken into consideration.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
- Dorzhansky Th. & B. Spassky (1947), Evolutionary changes in laboratory cultures of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1: 191–216.Google Scholar
- Dobzhansky Th. & B. Spassky (1960). Release of genetic variability through recombination. V. Breakup of synthetic lethals by crossing over in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Zool. Jb. 88: 57–66.Google Scholar
- Dobzhansky Th., B. Spassky & W. Anderson (1965). Biochromosomal synthetic semilethals in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 53: 482–486.Google Scholar
- Hadorn E. (1945a). Zur Pleiotropie der Genwirkung. Arch. Jul. Klaus-Stiji. VererbForsch. Ergänzungsband zu Band 20: 82–95.Google Scholar
- Magalhaes L. E., A.B. da Cunha, J.S. de Toledo, S. A. de Toledo H. L. De Sonza, H. J. Targa, V. Setzer & C.Pavan (1965b). On lethals and their suppressors in experimental populations of Drosophila willistoni. Mutation Res. 2: 45–54.Google Scholar
- Magalhaes L. E., J. S. De Toledo & A. B. Da Cunha, (1965a). The nature of lethals in Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 52: 599–608.Google Scholar
- Sperlich D. (1967). Die Bedeutung intrachromosaler Wechselwirkungen in der Populationsdynamik von Drosophila. Zool. Anz. (Suppl.), 31: 454–461.Google Scholar
- Sperlich D. & H. Feuerbach (1969). Austausch-Ungleichgewicht zwischen unabhängigen Inversionen in natürlichen Populationen von Drosophila subobscura. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 39: 104–112.Google Scholar
- Sperlich D. & A. Karlik (1963). Frequenz und Alleliegrad autosomaler Letalfaktoren in Insel- und Festlandpopulationen von Drosophila melanogaster. Zool. Anz. (Suppl.) 27: 74–78.Google Scholar
- Wallace B., J. V. King, C. V. Mandden, B. Kaufmann & E.C. McGunnigle (1953). An analysis of variability arising through recombination. Genetics 38: 272–307.Google Scholar