Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 209–222

Effects of heat and water vapor transport on eddy covariance measurement of CO2 fluxes

  • R. Leuning
  • O. T. Denmead
  • A. R. G. Lang
  • E. Ohtaki
Article

Abstract

Flux densities of carbon dioxide were measured over an arid, vegetation-free surface by eddy covariance techniques and by a heat budget-profile method, in which CO2 concentration gradients were specified in terms of mixing ratios. This method showed negligible fluxes of CO2, consistent with the bareness of the experimental site, whereas the eddy covariance measurements indicated large downward fluxes of CO2. These apparently conflicting observations are in quantitative agreement with the results of a recent theory which predicts that whenever there are vertical fluxes of sensible or latent heat, a mean vertical velocity is developed. This velocity causes a mean vertical convective mass flux (= ρcw for CO2, in standard notation). The eddy covariance technique neglects this mean convective flux and measures only the turbulent flux ρ′c w′. Thus, when the net flux of CO2 is zero, the eddy covariance method indicates an apparent flux which is equal and opposite to the mean convective flux, i.e., ρ′c w′ = −ρc w. Corrections for the mean convective flux are particularly significant for CO2 because ρcw and ρ′c w′ are often of similar magnitude. The correct measurement of the net CO2 flux by eddy covariance techniques requires that the fluxes of sensible and latent heat be measured as well.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakan, S.: 1978, ‘Note on the Eddy Correlation Method for CO2 Flux Measurements’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 14, 597–600.Google Scholar
  2. bindon, H. H.: 1965, ‘A Critical Review of Tables and Charts Used in Psychrometry’, in Wexler, A. (ed.), Humidity and Moisture Vol. 1. Principles and Methods of Measuring Humidity in Gases, Reinhold Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brook, R. R.: 1978, ‘The Influence of Water Vapor Fluctuations on Turbulent Fluxes’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 15. 481–487.Google Scholar
  4. Denmead, O. T.: 1969, ‘Comparative Micrometeorology of a Wheat Field and a Forest of Pinus radiata’, Agric. Meteorol. 6, 357–371.Google Scholar
  5. Dyer, A. J. and Hicks, B. B.: 1972, ‘The Spatial Variability of Eddy Fluxes in the Constant Flux Layer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 206–212.Google Scholar
  6. Funk, J. P.: 1959, ‘Improved Polythene-shielded Net Radiometer’, J. Sci. Instr. 36, 267–270.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, E. P. and Smith, S. D.: 1978, ‘The Air Density Correction to Eddy Flux Measurements’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 15, 357–360.Google Scholar
  8. Kaimal, J. C, Wyngaard, J. C, Izumi, Y., and Coté, O. R.: 1972, ‘Spectral Characteristics of Surface-layer Turbulence’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 563–589.Google Scholar
  9. Leuning, R. and Legg, B. J.: 1982, ‘Comments on “The Influence of Water Vapor Fluctuations on Turbulent Fluxes”, by Brook’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. (this issue).Google Scholar
  10. McIlroy, I. C.: 1971, ‘An Instrument for Continuous Recording of Natural Evaporation’, Agric. Meteorol. 9. 93–100.Google Scholar
  11. Monteith, J. L. and Szeicz, G.: 1960, ‘The CO2 Flux over a Field of Sugar Beet’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 205–214.Google Scholar
  12. Ohtaki, E.: 1980, ‘Turbulent Transport of Carbon Dioxide over a Paddy Field’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 19, 315–336.Google Scholar
  13. Philip, J. R.: 1957, ‘Evaporation, and Moisture and Heat Fields in the Soil’, J. Meteorol. 14, 354–366.Google Scholar
  14. Philip, J. R.: 1961, ‘The Theory of Heat Flux Meters’, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 571–579.Google Scholar
  15. Reinking, R. F.: 1980, ‘The Respective Effects of Water Vapor and Temperature on the Turbulent Fluxes of Sensible and Latent Heat’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 19, 373–385.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, S. D. and Jones, E. P.: 1979, ‘Dry-air Boundary Conditions for Correction of Eddy Flux Measurements’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 375–379.Google Scholar
  17. Tanner, C. B.: 1960, ‘Energy Balance Approach to Evapotranspiration from Crops’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24, 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. Webb, E. K.: 1982, ‘On the Correction of Flux Measurements for Effects of Heat and Water Vapor Transfer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. (this issue).Google Scholar
  19. Webb, E. K. and Pearman, G. I.: 1977, ‘Correction of CO2 Transfer Measurements for the Effect of Water Vapor Transfer’, Second Australasian Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer, The University of Sydney, Australia, pp. 469–476.Google Scholar
  20. Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: 1980, ‘Correction of Flux Measurements for Density Effects Due to Heat and Water Vapor Transfer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 85–100.Google Scholar
  21. Wesely, M. L., Thurtell, G. W., and Tanner, C. B.: 1970, ‘Eddy Correlation Measurements of Sensible Heat Flux Near the Earth's Surface’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 9, 45–50.Google Scholar
  22. van Wijk, W. R. and de Vries, D. A.: 1963, ‘Periodic Temperature Variations in Homogeneous Soil’, in W. R. van Wijk (ed.), Physics of Plant Environment, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Leuning
    • 1
  • O. T. Denmead
    • 1
  • A. R. G. Lang
    • 1
  • E. Ohtaki
    • 2
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Environmental MechanicsCanberra CityAustralia
  2. 2.College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Okayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations