Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 53–63 | Cite as

Management of secondary tree species in agroforestry systems to improve production sustainability in Amazonian Ecuador

  • R. B. Peck
  • J. P. Bishop


Three production systems (robusta coffee, cattle pastures and swidden agriculture), all associated with trees, have provided a strategy for regional development in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Feedback from more than 250 on-farm demonstrations, project evaluations and visitors have all contributed to strengthening the ability of the Ecuadorean Ministry of Agriculture's Forestry Directorate to provide colonists and indigenous groups with management guidelines for low-input sustainable agroforestry production. The existing market for 20 fastgrowing native tree species presents an opportunity for the diversification of farm income (currently dependent on robusta coffee) and for the development of a forest industrial base.

The collective area of land owned and operated by these small holders constitutes a national resource and a “Collective Forest Estate” that can be individually managed. Commercial timber production in these extensive secondary forests can help alleviate conversion of primary forest without taking agricultural land out of production.

Key words

sustainability Amazonia Desmodium ovalifolium Ecuador coffee production silvopastoral systems Coffee canephora Cordia alliodora Jacaranda copaia Brachiaria humidicola swidden agriculture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Binkley D (1986) Forest Nutrition Management. John Wiley Sons, NY, 290 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop JP (1983) Tropical forest sheep on legume forage/fuelwood follows. Agroforestry Systems 1: 79–84Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Custode E (1983) Mapa Morfo-Edafológico, Provincia del Napo. PRONAREG, MAG, Quito, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denevan WM and Padoch C (1989) Swidden-Fallow Agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany, Vol. 5. New York Botanical Garden, 197 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espin H and Pereira J (1989) Proyecto Sumaco: Definición Preliminar de la Zona y Procesos de Adaptación Cultural. Fundación Natura. Quito, Ecuador, 27 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Estrada RD, Seré C and Luzuriaga H (1988) Sistemas de Producción Agrosilvopastoriles en la Selva Baja de la Provincia del Napo, Ecuador. CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gutierrez F and Costales J (1990) Pastos con Arboles en la Selva Baja de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana: Manejo Silvo-Pastoril. Nota Técnica No. 1, Dirección Nacional Forestal, MAG, Quito, Ecuador, 26 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gutierrez F and Shiguango D (1990) Café robusta (Coffea canephora var. robusta) con Arboles en la Selva Baja de la Amazonía Eucuatoriana: Manejo Agro-Silvícola. Nota TécnicaNo.2. Dirección Nacional Forestal, MAG, Quito, Ecuador, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hudelson SE (1987) La Cultura Quichua de Transición: Su Expansión y Desarrollo en el Alto Amazonas. Museo Antropológico del Banco Central del Ecuador y Ediciones Abya-yala, Quito, 221 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irvine D (1987) El Manejo del Bosque Secundario por los Quichua-Amazónicos. Hombre y Ambiente, Quito, No. 2: 121–142Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janos OP (1983) Tropical mycorrhizas, nutrient cycles and plant growth. In: Sutton, Whitmore, Waduwich AC, eds, Tropical Rain Forests: Ecology and Management, pp 327–346. Blackwell Scientific Publications OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lathrap DW (1970) The Upper Amazon. New York, Praeger Publishers, Inc, 206 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moss B (1986) Mycorrhiza in sustainable agriculture. In: López Raul JM, Hodges RD, eds, The Role of Microorganisms in a Sustainable Agriculture, pp 105–124. A.B. Academic Pub, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muñoz K, de la Torre RR and Bishop J (1982) INIAP-Napo 701 (Brachiaria humidicola): Un Nuevo Pasto para la Región Amazónica Ecuatoriana. Boletín Divulgativo No. 121, INIAP, Quito, Ecuador, 10 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oberem U (1980) Los Quijos: Historia de la Transcultruación de un Grupo Indígena en el Oriente Ecuatoriano. Inst. Otavaleño de Antropología, 394 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peck RB (1990) Promoting agroforestry practices among small producers: The case of the Coca Agroforestry Project in Amazonian Ecuador. In: Anderson A, ed, Alternatives to Deforestation Symposium (1988) Belem, Brazil, pp 167–180. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peck RB (1985) Traditional Farming Practices. IX World Forestry Congress, Mexico, 10 pp. Voluntary paper (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romm J (1986) Forest policy and development policy. In: Blair HW, Olpadwala PD, eds (1988) Forestry in Development Planning. Westview Press, Boulder, 205 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wadsworth FH (1986) A time for secondary forest in tropical America. In: Figueroa CJC, ed, Proceedings of a Conference on Management of the Forests of Tropical America: Prospects and technologies, pp 189–198. San Juan, Puerto Rico, Inst of Tropical ForestryGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waidyanatha UP de s. (1980) Mycorrhizae of Hevea and Leguminous Ground Covers in Rubber Plantations. In: Mikola P, ed, Tropical Mycorrhiza Research, pp 238–241. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wyatt-Smith J (1987) Problems and prospects for natural management of tropical moist forests. In: Mergen F, Vincent JR, eds, Natural Management of Tropical Moist Forest, pp 2–22. Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. Peck
    • 1
  • J. P. Bishop
    • 2
  1. 1.Cali-ColombiaSouth America
  2. 2.MarysvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations