Agronomic evaluation of eleven Leucaena lines at Tumbi, Tabora, western Tanzania
Abstract
Two trials were carried out over five growing seasons in western Tanzania to investigate (a) forage production and quality of eight lines of Leucaena leucocephala, one of L. diversifolia and one of L. esculenta and (b) the effect of cutting height (25, 50 and 75 cm) on forage production of nine lines of L. leucocephala and one of L. diversifolia. The locally naturalized lines, T1 and K1, were consistently better in yield, out-producing the commercial L. leucocephala cultivars Cunningham, Peru and K8 in three or four out of the five seasons' harvests. Mean daily dry matter yields for all lines decreased as the dry season progressed. Mean yields were 54.9, 28.6 and 12.8 kg/ha/day in the rainy season, late rainy season/early dry season and late dry season, respectively. The concentrations of N (2.3 to 3.1%), P (0.13 to 0.17%), K (0.7 to 1.3%), Ca (0.6 to 1.6%) and Mg (o.4 to 0.6%) in the edible forage declined as the dry season became pronounced but were at levels sufficient for animal production except for P levels, which were low. Three distinct yield groups emerged from responses to cutting height: cv. Cunningham produced the greatest yields of edible forage at 25 cm cutting height; cv. Peru, cv. K8, Korog, T1, CpI 90790 and CPI 58394 at 50 cm; and CPI 58398, CPI 84511 and CPI 85132 at 75 cm.
Key words
cutting height forage production nutrient contentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984) Official Method of Analysis, 14th edn. AOAC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Atta-Krah AN, Sumberg JE and Reynolds L (1986) Leguminous fodder trees in the farming systems — an overview of research at the humid zone programme of ILCA in Southern Nigeria. In: Haque I, Jutzi A and Neate PNJ (eds) Potentials of Forage Legumes in Farming Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa, pp 307–329. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
- Aucump AJ, Smith LG and Moster JM (1978) The browse value of the Eastern Cape Valley Bushveld. Proc Grassl Soc South Afr 1: 91–93Google Scholar
- Bray RA, Cooksley DG, Hall TJ and Ratcliff F (1988) Performance of fourteen leucaena lines at five sites in Queensland. Aust J Exp Agric 28: 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butterworth MH (1985) Beef Cattle Nutrition and Tropical Pastures. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Harris W (1978) Defoliation as a determinant of the growth persistence and composition of pasture. In: Wilson JE (ed) Plant Relations in Pastures, pp 67–85. CSIRO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Jones RM, Tothill JC and Jones RJ (1984) Pastures and pasture management inthe tropics and subtropics. Trop Grassl Soc Austr, Occasional Publication No. 1Google Scholar
- Karim AB, Rhodes ER and Savill PS (1991) Effect of cutting height and cutting interval on dry matter yield of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) de Wit. Agrofor Syst 16: 129–137Google Scholar
- Leisleigher LC and Shelton HM (1986) Adoption of the shrub legume Leucaena leucocephala in southern and central Queensland. Trop Grassl 20: 97–107Google Scholar
- McKell CM (1980) Multiple use of fodder trees and shrubs — a world perspective. In: Le Houerou HN (ed) Browse in Africa. The Current State of Knowledge, pp 141–149. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (1987) Livestock Production Research Institute, Mpwapwa, Tanzania. Annual Report, pp 17–23Google Scholar
- National Research Council (1984) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 6th edn. NRC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Shelton HM, Lowry TB, Gutteridge RC, Bray RA and Wilden JH (1991) Sustaining productive pastures in the tropics. Tree and shrub legumes in improved pastures. Trop Grassl 25: 119–128Google Scholar
- Underwood EJ (1981) The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
- Wardlow IF (1980) The control and pattern of movement of carbohydrates in plants. Bot Rev 34: 79–105Google Scholar