Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 95–102

Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscle fibres without changing their typing in chickens

  • H. Remignon
  • M. F. Gardahaut
  • G. Marche
  • F. H. Ricard
Papers

Summary

Quantitative (muscle fibre number and cross-sectional areas) and qualitative (myosin isoforms and metabolic enzyme activities) characteristics of two muscles, M. pectoralis major and M. anterior latissimus dorsi, were compared among male chickens of two lines during growth from hatching to adulthood. The lines were derived from a divergent selection based on growth rate. The two muscles were chosen on the basis of their histochemical profile. Pectoralis major muscle contains only fast contracting muscle fibres whereas anterior latissimus dorsi muscle is almost entirely made up with slow contracting fibres. At both ages, the two lines showed similar fibre type distributions. At hatching, fibre cross-sectional areas were equivalent in the two lines, but after the first week, animals from the fast growing line exhibited wider fibre areas, whatever the muscle, than animals from the slow growing line. The total number of fibres in a muscle was found greater in the fast growing line, irrespective of whether it was exactly determined (anterior latissimus dorsi muscle, +20%) or only estimated (pectoralis major muscle). This number remains constant in the two lines throughout the growth. Myosin isoform profiles and metabolic enzyme activities were similar in the two lines, at both ages, and were in good agreement with the histochemical muscle fibre profiles.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABERLE E. D. & DOOLITTLE D. P. (1976) Skeletal muscle cellularity in mice selected for large body size and in controls. Growth 40, 133–45.Google Scholar
  2. ABERLE E. D. & STEWART T. S. (1983) Growth of fibers types and apparent fiber number in skeletal muscle of broiler and layer type chickens. Growth 47, 135–44.Google Scholar
  3. ASHMORE C. R., TOMPKINS G. & DOERR L. (1972) Postnatal development of muscle fiber in domestic animals. J. Animal Sci. 34, 37–41.Google Scholar
  4. BACOU F. & VIGNERON P. (1976) Evolution périnatale des voies métaboliques glycolytiques et oxydatives de divers types de muscles squelettiques du lapin et du poulet: Ann. Biol. Animale Biochim. 16, 675–85.Google Scholar
  5. BARNARD E. A., LYLES J. M. & PIZZEY J. A. (1982) Fibre types in chicken skeletal muscles and their changes in muscular distrophy. J. Physiol. 331, 333–54.Google Scholar
  6. BASS A., LUSCH G. & PETTE D. (1970) Postnatal differentiation of the enzyme activity pattern of energy-supplying metabolism in slow (red) and fast (white) muscles of the chicken. Eur. J. Biochem. 13, 289–92.Google Scholar
  7. BASS A., BRDICZKA D., EYER P., HOPER S. & PETTE D. (1969) Metabolic differenciation of distinct muscles types at the level of enzymatic organization. Eur. J. Biochem. 10, 198–206.Google Scholar
  8. BRIAND M., BOISSONET G., LAPLACE-MARIEZE V. & BRIAND Y. (1993) Metabolic and contractile differentiation of rabbit muscles during growth. Int. J. Biochem. 25, 1881–7.Google Scholar
  9. BUCHE, P. (1990) RACINE: Un système d'analyse multi-images de coupes sériées. Application à la caractérisation de fibres musculaires. Thesis, Université de Rennes I (France). Mention Informatique, no. 431.Google Scholar
  10. BYRNET I., HOOPER J. C. & McCARTHY J. C. (1973) Effects of selection for body size on the weight and cellular response of seven mouse muscles. Animal Prod. 17, 187–96.Google Scholar
  11. D'ALBIS A., PANTALONI C. & BECHET J. J. (1979) An electrophoretic study of native myosin isozymes and of their subunit content. Eur. J. Biochem. 99, 261–72.Google Scholar
  12. D'ALBIS A., JANMOT C. & BECHET J. J. (1986) Comparisons of myosins from the masseter muscle of adult rat, mouse and guinea-pig. Persistence of neonatal-type isoforms in the murine muscle. Eur. J. Biochem. 156, 291.Google Scholar
  13. FOURNIER-LERAY C. & FONTAINE-PERUS J. (1991) Influence of spinal cord stimulation on the innervation pattern of muscle fibers in vivo. J. Neurosci. 11, 3840–50.Google Scholar
  14. FOWLER S. P., CAMPION D. R., MARKS H. L. & REUGAN J. O. (1980) An analysis of skeletal muscle response to selection for rapid growth in Japanese quail. Growth 44, 235–52.Google Scholar
  15. GARDAHAUT M. F., ROUAUD T., RENAUD D. & le DOUARIN G. (1988) Developmental changes in myosin isoforms from slow and fast latissimus dorsi muscles in the chicken. Differentiation 37, 81–5.Google Scholar
  16. GUTH L. & SAMAHA F. J. (1969) Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscles. Exper. Neurol. 25, 138–52.Google Scholar
  17. HANHARAN J. P., COOPER C. A. & McCARTHY J. C. (1973) Effects of divergent selection for body weight on fibre number and diameter in two muscles. Animal Prod. 16, 7–16.Google Scholar
  18. HOH J. F. Y. (1979) Developmental changes in chicken skeletal myosin isoenzymes. FEBS Letts 982, 267–70.Google Scholar
  19. HOH J. F. Y., McGRATH P. A. & WHITE R. I. (1976) Electrophoretic analysis of multiple forms of myosin in fast-twitch and slow-twitch muscles of the chick. Biochem. J. 157, 87–95.Google Scholar
  20. HOOPER A. C. B. (1978) Muscles and bones of large and small mice compared at equal body weight. J. Anat. 127, 117–23.Google Scholar
  21. HORAK V., SERCIKOVA K. & KNIZCTOVA H. (1989) Histochemical fiber types in the tigh muscles of 4 chickens inbred lines. Anat. Anzeit. 169, 313–20.Google Scholar
  22. KENNEDY J. M., RADOVAN Zak & LIZHU Gao. (1991) Myosin expression in hypertrophied fast-twitch and slow tonic muscles of normal and dystrophic chickens. Muscle Nerve 14, 166–77.Google Scholar
  23. LUFF A. R. & GOLDSPINK G. (1970) Total number of fibers in muscles of several strains of mice. J. Animal Sci. 30, 891–3.Google Scholar
  24. MARUYAMA K. & KANEMAKI N. (1991) Myosin isoform expression in skeletal muscles of turkey at various ages. Poultry Sci. 70, 1748–57.Google Scholar
  25. MOSS F. P. (1968) The relationship between the dimensions of the fibres and the number of nuclei during normal growth of skeletal muscle in the domestic fowl. Am. J. Anat. 122, 555–64.Google Scholar
  26. REMIGNON, H. (1993) Contribution à l'étude histologique et biochimique des muscles dans deux lignées de poulets à croissance lente ou rapide. Thesis, Université de Clermont-Ferrand II (France), Mention Science des Aliments, no. 607.Google Scholar
  27. RICARD F. H. (1975) Essai de sélection sur la forme de la souche de croissance chez le poulet. Ann. Génét. Sélec. Animale 7, 427–43.Google Scholar
  28. SAS (1985) User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  29. SMITH J. H. (1963) Relation of body size to muscle cell size and number in the chicken. Poultry Sci 42, 283–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Remignon
    • 1
  • M. F. Gardahaut
    • 2
  • G. Marche
    • 1
  • F. H. Ricard
    • 1
  1. 1.Station de Recherches AvicolesInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueNouzillyFrance
  2. 2.Groupe de Physiologie CellulaireC.R.B.P.C.C., Faculté des SciencesNantes-Cedex 03France

Personalised recommendations