Advertisement

Porosity and mould filling of titanium castings

  • H. Herø
  • M. Syverud
  • M. Waarli
Article

A vacuum/Ar pressure casting machine was used to study porosity and mould filling of cast bridges of Ti. Two series of experiments were carried out: (1) The melting and the mould chamber were separated by a thin Ti foil until penetrated by the Ti melt. The mould chamber including the mould cavity was evacuated. (2) No separating Ti foil was applied. The pressure in the mould chamber was then controlled by diffusion of Ar through the investment. The moulds were made of two investments with different gas permeability. A standardized wax pattern for a five-unit bridge was used. Mould filling was evaluated by visual inspection and by measuring the missing lengths of the margins of the crowns. The porosity was studied by x-ray radiography and density measurements. In the first series mould filling was satisfactory in all cases, while the porosity was substantial for high Ar pressures. Without a Ti foil (second series) all castings contained little porosity, but the mould filling was adequate only for the high permeability investment. The experiments show that porosity can be avoided by maintaining small pressure differences between the melting chamber and the mould cavity. Adequate mould filling is promoted by minimal back pressures from trapped Ar gas in the mould.

Keywords

Porosity Back Pressure Casting Machine Mould Cavity Pressure Casting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. IDA, in Proceedings of the First International Kyoto Symposium on Biomedical Materials, Kyoto, Japan, 1983, p. 139.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.GEIS-GERSTDORFER, H.WEBER, A.SIMONIS, M.ECKHARDT and D.HASSELBERGER, Dental-Labor XXXVII (1989) 1789.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.OTT, Dental-Labor 38 (1990) 805.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.SUNNERKRANTZ, M.SYVERUD and H.HERØ, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 98 (1990) 268.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. M.WATERSTRAT and A. A.GIUSEPPETTI, J. Dent. Res. 64 (1985) 317, Abstr. No. 1278.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.HERØ, M.SYVERUD, M.WAARLI and R. B.JØRGENSEN, in Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Titanium Products and Applications, Vol. II (Titanium Development Association, Dayton, 1988) p. 612.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. J.BROCKHURST, U. G.MCLAVERTY and Z.KASLOFF, Oper. Dent. 8 (1983) 130.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.WATANABE, S.IKAWA, O.MIYAKAWA, S.NAKANO, N.SHIOKAWA and M.KOBAYASHI, Dent. Mater. J. 10 (1991) 128.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.TOGOYA and K.IDA, in Transactions of the Third World Biomaterials Congress, Kyoto, Japan, April 21–23, 1988 (Business Center for Acad. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 1988) 5P-34, 575.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.HERØ and M.WAARLI, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 99 (1991) 55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Herø
    • 1
  • M. Syverud
    • 1
  • M. Waarli
    • 1
  1. 1.NIOMScandinavian Institute of Dental MaterialsHaslumNorway

Personalised recommendations