Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 323–330

Aerodynamic roughness as a function of wind direction over asymmetric surface elements

  • B. S. Jackson
  • J. J. Carroll
Article

Abstract

Wind speed and temperature profiles to a height of 8 m were recorded for 30-, 60-, and 90-min averaging times over a striated snow surface at the geographic South Pole during the austral winter of 1975. A gradient Richardson number was calculated for each averaging time to determine conditions of neutral stability under which the logarithmic wind law would hold. A log-linear regression technique was used to determine values of aerodynamic roughness height (Z0) for those profile averages recorded in conditions of neutral stability. A plot of Z0 as a function of average wind direction revealed a variation in Z0 of almost three orders of magnitude, from 0.01 to 7 cm, over 120 deg of wind direction. A simple model is presented to justify the fact that aerodynamic roughness is a function of wind direction and erosion history.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Businger, J. A.: 1972, ‘Turbulent Transfer in the Atmospheric Surface Layers’, A.M.S. Workshop in Micrometeorology, Chapter 2, D. Haugan (ed.), pp. 67–98.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, J. J. and Hamilton, R. H.: 1977, ‘The South Pole Energy Balance Experiment: Methodology, Instrumentation, and Operational Performance’, Contributions to Atmospheric Sciences, No. 12, Dept. L.A.W.R., University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  3. Dalrymple, P. C: 1966, ‘A Physical Climatology of the Antarctic Plateau’, Am. Geophys. Union, Publication 1482, M. J. Rubin (ed.), Antarctic Research Series 9, 195–231.Google Scholar
  4. Dalrymple, P. C., Lettau, H. H., and Wollaston, S. H.: 1966, ‘South Pole Micrometeorology Program: Data Analysis’, Am. Geophys. Union, Publication 1482, M. J. Rubin (ed.), Antarctic Research Series 9, 13–58.Google Scholar
  5. Hicks, B. B.: 1973, ‘Eddy Fluxes Over a Vineyard’, Agric. Meteorol. 12, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kutzbach, J. E.: 1961, ‘Investigations of the Modifications of Wind Profiles by Artificially Controlled Surface Roughness’, Annual Report, Studies of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the Planetary Boundary Layer, Contract DA-36-039-SC-80282 (USEPG, Fort Huachuca, Ariz.), University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  7. Lettau, H. H.: 1969, ‘Note on Aerodynamic Roughness-Parameter Estimation on the Basis of Roughness Element Description’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 1, 828–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marshall, J. K.: 1970, ‘Drag Measurements in Roughness Arrays of Varying Density and Distribution’, Agric. Meteorol. 8, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Plate, E. K.: 1971, Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Office of Information Services, T1D-25465, 190 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Sellers, W. D.: 1965, Physical Climatology, University of Chicago Press, Fourth Edition, 1972.Google Scholar
  11. Wooding, R. A., Bradley, E. F., and Marshall, J. K.: 1973, ‘Drag Due to Regular Arrays of Roughness Elements of Varying Geometry’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 5, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. Jackson
    • 1
  • J. J. Carroll
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Atmospheric Science SectionUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations