Instructional Science

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 83–98 | Cite as

Development of a research specialty: Instructional psychology portrayed in The Annual Review of Psychology

  • Robert J. Menges
  • Denis L. Girard
Article

Abstract

The relatively new research specialty, instructional psychology, has been the topic of five chapters in the Annual Review of Psychology. Development of this specialty is studied through content analysis and citation analysis of these chapters. Cognitive structure of the field is found to be more converging than diverging and more conforming than radical. Social structure shows growth without divergence and a close fit with established institutions. The field would be enriched through greater attention to research being conducted outside the United States and to research reflecting conceptions and methods in addition to those from the experimental-quantitative tradition.

Keywords

Social Structure Content Analysis Annual Review Citation Analysis Cognitive Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cole, J. R. and Zuckerman, H. (1975). “The emergence of a scientific specialty: The self-exemplifying case of the sociology of science,” in L. A.Coser (Ed.), The Idea of Social Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, pp. 139–174.Google Scholar
  2. Elton, L. R. B. and Laurillard, D. M. (1979). “Trends in research on student learning,” Studies in Higher Education 4: 87–102.Google Scholar
  3. Gagné, R. M. and Rohwer, W. D.Jr. (1969). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology 20: 381–418.Google Scholar
  4. Glaser, R. and Resnick, L. B. (1972). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology 23: 207–276.Google Scholar
  5. Griffith, B. C. and Mullins, N. C. (1972). “Coherent social groups in scientific change,” Science 177 (4053): 959–964.Google Scholar
  6. Marton, F. (1981). “Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us,” Instructional Science 10: 177–200.Google Scholar
  7. Marton, F. and Svensson, L. (1979). “Conceptions of research in student learning,” Higher Education 8: 471–486.Google Scholar
  8. Mathis, B. C., Menges, R. J. and McMillan, J. H. (1977). “Content and boundaries of educational psychology,” in D.Treffinger, J. K.Davis and R. R.Ripple (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching Educational Psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
  9. McKeachie, W. J. (1974). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology 25: 161–193.Google Scholar
  10. Merrill, M. D., Kowallis, T. and Wilson, B. G. (1981). “Instructional design in transition,” in F. H.Farley and N. J.Gordon (Eds.), Psychology and Education: The State of the Union. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, pp. 298–348.Google Scholar
  11. Merton, R. K. (1979). The Sociology of Science: An Episodic Memoir. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Oromaner, M. (1979). “When publications perish,” Scholarly Publishing 10: 339–344.Google Scholar
  13. Oromaner, M. (1981). “Articles in core economic journals: A citation analysis,” Knowledge 3: 83–96.Google Scholar
  14. Resnick, L. B. (1981). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology 32: 659–704.Google Scholar
  15. Smart, J. C. and Elton, C. F. (1981). “Structural characteristics and citation rates of education journals,” American Educational Research Journal 18: 399–413.Google Scholar
  16. Wittrock, M. C. and Lumsdaine, A. A. (1977). “Instructional psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology 28: 417–459.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Menges
    • 1
  • Denis L. Girard
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Teaching ProfessionsNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations