Instructional Science

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 199–221 | Cite as

Teaching a large Russian language vocabulary by the mnemonic keyword method

  • Michael R. Raugh
  • Richard D. Schupbach
  • Richard C. Atkinson
Article

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a mnemonic procedure, called the keyword method, for teaching a large Russian language vocabulary to college students. The method divides the study of a vocabulary item into two stages. The first stage requires the student to associate the spoken Russian word with an English word (the keyword) that sounds like some part of the foreign word; the second stage requires the student to form a mental image of the keyword “interacting” with the English translation. Thus, the keyword method can be described as a chain of two links connecting a foreign word to its English translation through the mediation of a keyword: the foreign word is linked to a keyword by a similarity in sound (acoustic link), and the keyword is linked to the English translation by a mental image (imagery link). A computer controlled curriculum using the keyword method served as a supplement to the second-year Russian language course at Stanford University. Students studied a large basic vocabulary over an 8 to 10-week period. Data obtained during the study and student reports indicate that the keyword method was highly effective.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. C. “Ingredients for a theory of instruction.” American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 921–931.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. C. Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 1975, 30: 821–828.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C. “Adaptive instructional systems: Some attempts to optimize the learning process.” In D.Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction, Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C., Bower, G. H. and Crothers, E. J. An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R. C. and Paulson, J. A. “An approach to the psychology of instruction.” Psychological Bulletin, 1972. 78, 49–61.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, R. C. and Raugh, M. R. “An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 104, 126–133.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, R. C. and Shiffrin, R. M. “Human memory:A proposed system and its control processes.” In K. W.Spence and J. T.Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. Holley, F. M. “A study of vocabulary in context: The effect of new-word density in German reading materials.” Foreign Language Annals, 1973, 6, 339–347.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, J. P. Linguistics and Language Teaching. New York: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Ott, C. E., Butler, D. C., Blake, R. S. and Ball, J. P. “The effect of interactive-image elaboration on the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary.” Language Learning, 1973, 23, 197–206.Google Scholar
  11. Raugh, M. R. and Atkinson, R. C. “A mnemonic method for learning a second-language vocabulary.” Journal of Eductional Psychology, 1975, 67, 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Yates, F. The art of memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Raugh
  • Richard D. Schupbach
  • Richard C. Atkinson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations