New Forests

, Volume 6, Issue 1–4, pp 217–240 | Cite as

Gene dispersal within forest tree populations

  • W. T. Adams
Review paper Mating systems, gene dispersal, and genetic structure within population


Patterns of gene dispersal by seeds and pollen greatly influence the genetic structure of plant populations and their effective size. This paper reviews methods of measuring gene dispersal and current information on patterns of dispersal within local populations of forest trees. Recently, a number of statistical procedures for investigating gene movement based on the use of large numbers of isozyme loci have been described. These procedures include various forms of parentage analysis and the fitting of mating models to genotypic arrays of offspring from individual maternal plants. With the levels of genetic discrimination currently possible in forest trees, the model approach appears to be the most reliable means of estimating gene dispersal parameters. Too little data are available to draw general conclusions about patterns of gene movement within natural populations. Nevertheless, reports to date indicate that dispersal by both pollen and seed can be considerable. For any one mother tree, the bulk of effective pollen in conifers may come from distant males in the same stand or from surrounding stands (gene flow). In insect-pollinated angiosperms, gene flow may also be substantial, but cross-fertilization within stands may primarily be between nearest flowering trees.

Key words

gene dispersal mating patterns paternity analysis genetic structure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, W. T. and Birkes, D. S. 1989. Mating patterns in seed orchards. Proc. 20th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf, Charleston, South Carolina. pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, W. T. and Birkes, D. S. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations, pp. 157–172. In: Fineschi, S., Malvolti, M. E., Cannata, F. and Hattemer, H. H. (Eds) Biochemical Markers In The Population Genetics of Forest Trees. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, W. T., Birkes, D. S. and Erickson, V. J. 1992a. Using genetic markers to measure gene flow and pollen dispersal in forest tree seed orchards. In: R. Wyatt (Ed) Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction: New Approaches. Chapman and Hall, New York (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Adams, W. T., Griffin, A. R. and Moran, G. F. 1992b. Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. Amer. Naturalist (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Bramlett, D. L. 1981. Effectiveness of wind pollination in seed orchards, pp. 10–14. In: Franklin, E. C. (Ed) Pollen Management Handbook. U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Agric. Handbook 587.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. H. D. 1989. Genetic characterization of plant mating systems, pp. 145–162. In: Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. and Weir, B. S. (Eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Assocs. Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Chakraborty, R., Meagher, T. R. and Smouse, P. E. 1988. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. 1. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118: 527–536.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, T. J. 1984. The estimation of neighbourhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity 52: 273–283.Google Scholar
  9. Devlin, B., Risch, N. and Roeder, K. 1990. No excess of homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting. Science 249: 1416–1420.Google Scholar
  10. Devlin, B., Roeder, K. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1988. Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 369–380.Google Scholar
  11. Ellstrand, N. C. 1992. Gene flow among seed plant populations. This issue (pp. 241–256).Google Scholar
  12. Ellstrand, N. C. and Marshall, D. L. 1986. Patterns of multiple paternity in populations of Raphanus sativus. Evolution 40: 837–842.Google Scholar
  13. Epperson, B. K. 1992. Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. This issue (pp. 257–278).Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, S. T. and Adams, W. T. 1985. Estimation of gene flow into two seed orchards of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 609–615.Google Scholar
  15. Furnier, G. R., Knowles, P., Clyde, M. A. and Dancik, B. P. 1987. Effects of avian seed dispersal on the genetic structure of whitebark pine populations. Evolution 41: 607–612.Google Scholar
  16. Gregorius, H-R. 1975. A model for the genetic relationship among offspring from open-pollinated plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 46: 109–115.Google Scholar
  17. Hamrick, J. L. and Murawski, D. A. 1990. The breeding structure of tropical tree populations. Plant Species Biol. 5: 157–165.Google Scholar
  18. Hamrick, J. L. and Schnabel, A. 1985. Understanding the genetic structure of plant populations: some old problems and a new approach, pp. 50–70. In: Gregorius, H-R. (Ed) Population Genetics In Forestry. Lecture Notes In Biomathematics 60, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Handel, S. N. 1983. Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow, pp. 163–211. In: Real, L. (Ed) Pollination Biology. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  20. Issac, L. A. 1930. Seed flight in the Douglas fir region. J. Forestry 28: 492–499.Google Scholar
  21. Jeffreys, A. L., Wilson, V. and Thein, S. L. 1985. Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature 316: 76–79.Google Scholar
  22. Lanner, R. M. 1966. Needed: a new approach to the study of pollen dispersion. Silvae Genet. 15: 50–52.Google Scholar
  23. Ledig, F. T. 1974. An analysis of methods for the selection of trees from wild stands. Forest Sci. 20:2–16.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, D. A. 1981. Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 68: 233–253.Google Scholar
  25. Levin, D. A. 1983. Plant parentage: an alternative view of breeding structure of populations, pp. 171–188. In: King, C. E. and Dawson, P. S. (Eds) Population Biology Retrospect and Prospect. Columbia Univ. Press., New York.Google Scholar
  26. Levin, D. A. and Kerster, H. W. 1974. Gene flow in seed plants, pp. 139–220. In: Dobzhansky, T., Hecht, M. T. and Steere, W. C. (Eds) Evolutionary Biology 7, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Libby, W. J., Stettler, R. F. and Seitz, F. W. 1969. Forest genetics and forest-tree breeding. Ann. Rev. Genet. 3: 469–494.Google Scholar
  28. Linhart, Y. B., Mitton, J. B., Sturgeon, K. B. and Davis, M. L. 1981. Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407–426.Google Scholar
  29. Meagher, T. R. and Thompson, E. 1986. The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Theor. Pop. Biol. 29: 87–106.Google Scholar
  30. Meagher, T. R. and Thompson, E. 1987. Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum (Liliaceae). Ecology 68:803–812Google Scholar
  31. Mitton, J. B. 1992. The dynamic mating systems of conifers. This issue (pp. 197–216).Google Scholar
  32. Müller, G. 1977. Short note: cross-fertilization in a conifer stand inferred from enzyme gene-markers in seeds. Silvae Genet. 26: 223–226.Google Scholar
  33. Müller-Starck, G. 1982. Reproductive systems in conifer seed orchards. 1. Mating probabilities in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris L. Silvae Genet. 31: 188–197.Google Scholar
  34. Muona, O. 1989. Population genetics in forest tree improvement, pp. 282–298. In: Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. and Weir, B. S. (Eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Assocs. Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Namkoong, G. 1966. Inbreeding effects on estimation of genetic additive variance. Forest Sci. 66: 8–13.Google Scholar
  36. Neale, D. B. 1984. Population genetic structure of the Douglas-fir shelterwood regeneration system in southwest Oregon. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Neale, D. B. and Adams, W. T. 1985. The mating system in natural and shelterwood stands of Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 201–207.Google Scholar
  38. Nybom, H. and Schaal, B. A. 1990. DNA “fingerprints” applied to paternity analysis in apples (Malus X domestica). Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 763–768.Google Scholar
  39. Park, Y. S.and Fowler, D. P. 1982. Effects of inbreeding and genetic variances in a natural population of tamarack (Larix Laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) in eastern Canada. Silvae Genet. 31: 21–26.Google Scholar
  40. Park, Y. S., Fowler, D. P. and Coles, J. F. 1984. Population studies of white spruce II. Natural inbreeding and relatedness among neighboring trees. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 909–913.Google Scholar
  41. Ritland, K. 1983. Estimation of mating systems, pp. 289–302. In: Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J. (Eds) Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part A. Elsevier Science Publish. Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  42. Roeder, K., Devlin, B. and Lindsay, B. G. 1989. Application of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics 45: 363–379.Google Scholar
  43. Schnabel, A. 1988. Population genetic structure and gene flow in Gleditsia triacanthos L. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  44. Schoen, D. J. and Stewart, S. C. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40: 1109–1120.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw, D. V. and Allard, R. W. 1982. Estimation of outcrossing rates in Douglas-fir using isozyme markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62:113–120.Google Scholar
  46. Silen, R. R. 1962. Pollen dispersal considerations for Douglas-fir. J. Forestry 60: 790–795.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, D. B. and Adams, W. T. 1983. Measuring pollen contamination in clonal seed orchards with the aid of genetic markers. Proc. 17th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Athens, GA. 69–77.Google Scholar
  48. Smouse, P. E. and Chakraborty, R. 1986. The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 38:918–939.Google Scholar
  49. Sorensen, F. C. and White, T. L. 1988. Effect of natural inbreeding on variance structure in tests of wind-pollination Douglas-fir progenies. Forest Sci. 34: 102–118.Google Scholar
  50. Squillace, A. E. 1974. Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet. 23: 149–155.Google Scholar
  51. Wang, C-W., Perry, T. O. and Johnson, A. G. 1960. Pollen dispersion of slash pine (Pinus elliotii Engelm.) with special reference to seed orchard management. Silvae Genet. 4: 78–86.Google Scholar
  52. Wheeler, N. C., Adams, W. T. and Hamrick, J. L. 1992. Pollen distribution in wind-pollinated seed orchards. In: Bramlett, D. L., Askew, G. R, Blush, T. D., Bridgwater, F. E. and Jett, J. B. (Eds) Pollen Management Handbook, Vol. 2, USDA Forest Service Agric. Bulletin (in press).Google Scholar
  53. Yazdani, R, Lindgren, D. and Rudin, D. 1985. Gene dispersion and selfing frequency in a seed-tree stand of Pinus sylvestris (L.), pp. 139–154. In: Gregorius, H-R. (Ed) Population Genetics in Forestry, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 60, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Yazdani, R., Lindgren, D. and Stewart, S. 1989. Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris. Scand. J. For. 4: 295–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. T. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations