New Forests

, Volume 6, Issue 1–4, pp 95–124 | Cite as

Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species

  • J. L. Hamrick
  • Mary Jo W. Godt
  • Susan L. Sherman-Broyles
Review paper Assessment of genetic diversity within and among species

Abstract

The plant allozyme literature was reviewed to: (1) compare genetic diversity in long-lived woody species with species representing other life forms, and (2) to investigate whether the levels and distribution of genetic diversity in woody species are related to life history and ecological characteristics. Data from 322 woody taxa were used to measure genetic diversity within species, and within and among populations of species. Woody species maintain more variation within species and within populations than species with other life forms but have less variation among populations. Woody species with large geographic ranges, outcrossing breeding systems, and wind or animal-ingested seed dispersal have more genetic diversity within species and populations but less variation among populations than woody species with other combinations of traits. Although life history and ecological traits explain a significant proportion (34%) of the variation among species for the genetic parameters measured, a large proportion of the interspecific variation is unexplained. The specific evolutionary history of each species must play an important role in determining the level and distribution of genetic diversity.

Key words

allozyme electrophoresis life history characteristics polymorphic loci population genetics trees 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 15: 1–42.Google Scholar
  2. Dancik, B. P. and Yeh, F. C. 1983. Allozyme variability and evolution of lodgepole pine (Pines contorta var. latifolia) and jack pine (Pines banksiana) in Alberta. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 25: 57–64.Google Scholar
  3. Ellstrand, N. C. and Roose, M. L. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot. 74: 123–131.Google Scholar
  4. Farmer, R. E., Cheliak, W. M., Perry, D. J., Knowles, P., Barrett, J. and Pitel, J. A. 1988. Isozyme variation in balsam poplar along a latitudinal transect in northwestern Ontario. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 1078–1081.Google Scholar
  5. Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7: 1–46.Google Scholar
  6. Hamrick, J. L. 1976. Variation and selection in western montane species. II. Variation between and within stands of white fir on an elevational transect. Theor. Appl. Genet. 48: 27–34.Google Scholar
  7. 1978. Genetic variation and longevity. pp. 84–113. In: Solbrig, O.T., Jain, S., Johnson, G. B. and P. H. Raven (Eds) Plant Population Biology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hamrick, J. L. and Loveless, M. D. 1989. The genetic structure of tropical tree populations: Associations with reproductive biology. pp. 129–146. In: Bock, J. and Linhart, Y. B. (Eds) The Evolutionary Ecology of Plants. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  9. Hamrick, J. L. and Godt, M. J. W. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. pp. 43–63. In: Brown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. and Weir, B. S. (Eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Hamrick, J. L., Blanton, H. M., and Hamrick, K. J. 1989. Genetic structure of geographically marginal populations of ponderosa pine. Am. J. Bot. 76: 1559–1568Google Scholar
  11. Hamrick, J. L., Linhart, Y. B. and Mitton, J. B. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretiically-detectable genetic variation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 173–200.Google Scholar
  12. Kinloch, B. B. and Stonecypher, R. W. 1969. Genetic variation in susceptibility to fusiform rust in seedlings from a wild population of loblolly pine. Phytopathology 59: 1246–1255.Google Scholar
  13. Kinloch, B. B., Westfall, R. D. and Forrest, G. I. 1986. Caledonian Scots pine: Origins and genetic structure. New Phytol. 104: 703–729.Google Scholar
  14. Ledig, F. T. and Conkle, M. T. 1983. Gene diversity and genetic structure in a narrow endemic, Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana Parry ex Carr). Evolution 37: 79–85.Google Scholar
  15. Libby, W. J., Stettler, R. F. and Setz, F. W. 1969. Forest genetics and forest tree breeding. Ann. Rev. Genet. 3: 469–494.Google Scholar
  16. Loveless, M. D. and Hamrick, J. L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65–95.Google Scholar
  17. Millar, C. I. 1983. A steep cline in Pinus muricata. Evolution 37: 311–319.Google Scholar
  18. Moran, G. F., Muona, O. and Bell, J. C. 1989. Acacia mangium: A tropical forest tree of the coastal lowlands with low genetic diversity. Evolution 43: 231–235.Google Scholar
  19. Nevo, E., Beiles, A. and Ben-Shlomo, R. 1984. The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: Ecological, demographic and life history correlates. pp. 13–123. In: Mani, G. S. (Ed) Evolutionary Dynamics of Genetic Diversity. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics Vol. 53. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70: 3321–3323.Google Scholar
  21. Perry, D. J. and Knowles, P. 1989. Allozyme variation in sugar maple at the northern limits of its range in Ontario, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 509–514.Google Scholar
  22. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT TM Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 Edition. 1987. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. 1028 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Scheller, G., Conkle, M. T. and Griswald, L. 1985. Local differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Aleppo pine in their isozymes. Silv. Genet. 35: 11–19.Google Scholar
  24. Simon, J. P., Bergeron, Y. and Gagnon, D. 1986. Isozyme uniformity in populations of red pine (Pinus resinosa) in the Abitibi Region, Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 1133–1135.Google Scholar
  25. Stonecypher, R. W., Zobel, B. J. and Blair, R. 1973. Inheritance patterns of loblolly pine from a nonselected natural population. N.C. Agric. Exper. Station Tech. Bull. No. 220. 60 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Surles, S. E., Hamrick, J. L. and Bongarten, B. C. 1989. Allozyme variation in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Can. J. For. Res. 16: 471–479.Google Scholar
  27. Tremblay, M. and Simon, J. P. 1989. Genetic structure of marginal populations of white spruce (Picea glauca) at its northern limits of distribution in northern Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1371–1379.Google Scholar
  28. Weir, B. S. 1989. Sampling properties of gene diversity. pp. 23–42. In: Brown, A.D.H., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L. and B. S. Weir (Eds) Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Wells, O. O. and Snyder E. B. 1976. Longleaf pine half-sib progeny test. For. Sci. 22: 404–406.Google Scholar
  30. Wheeler, N. C. and Guries, R. P. 1982. Population structure, genetic diversity and morphological variation in Pinus contorta Dougl. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 595–606.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Hamrick
    • 1
  • Mary Jo W. Godt
    • 1
  • Susan L. Sherman-Broyles
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Botany and GeneticsUniversity of GeorgiaAthens, GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations