Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 15, Issue 2–3, pp 139–165 | Cite as

Understanding an indigenous knowledge system for tree fodder via a multi-method on-farm research approach

  • Eric P. Rusten
  • Michael A. Gold
Article

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of indigenous resource management systems can benefit natural resource development efforts and contribute to effective on-farm agroforestry research initiatives. This paper reports on the authors' investigation of an indigenous knowledge systems for the management, cultivation, and use of private tree fodder resources in a community in the middle hills of Central Nepal. It focuses on the methods used to develop an understanding of the cognitive systems used by farmers in this community to classify and evaluate tree fodder. A participatory multi-method research approach was employed to overcome many of the limitations of traditional survey research. The approach centered on the use of the repertory grid method within the framework of personal construct theory. Repertory grid results were analyzed in conjunction with data collected from participant observation, a formal household survey, an inventory of privately grown trees, and ethnographic interviews. This integrated analysis resulted in an understanding of the indigenous knowledge system for the management of tree fodder resources.

Key words

agroforestry research on-farm research indigenous knowledge tree fodder Nepal personal construct theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advisory Committee on the Sahel (1983) Agroforestry in the West African Sahel. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Bannister D and Fransella F (1977) Inquiring Man: The Theory of Personal Constructs. Penguin Books, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett L (1983) Dangerous Wives and Sacred Sisters: Social and Symbolic Roles of High-Caste Women in Nepal. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Clay JW (1988) Indigenous Peoples and Tropical Forests: Models of Land Use and Management for Latin America. Cultural Survival, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  5. Conklin HC (1957) Hanunoo agriculture, a report on the integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Forestry Department Paper No 21, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Ewel JJ (1986) Designing agricultural ecosystems for the humid tropics. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 17:245–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatley T and Thompson M (1985) Rare animals, poor people, and big agencies: a perspective on biological conservation and rural development in the Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 5(4):365–377Google Scholar
  8. Kelly GA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Volume I. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Lumle (1987) Personal communication with staff at Lumle Agricultural CentreGoogle Scholar
  10. Molnar A (1981) The Kham Magar Women of Thabang. The Status of Women in Nepal, Vol 2 Part 2. Center for Economic Development and Administration, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  11. Nations JD and Kromer DI (1983) Central America's tropical rain forests: positive steps for survival. Ambio 12(5):232–238Google Scholar
  12. Olofson H (1983) Indigenous agroforestry systems. Philippine Quarterly of Culture & Society 11:149–174Google Scholar
  13. Panday K.K. (1982) Fodder Trees and Tree Fodder in Nepal. Swiss Development Cooperation, Berne, and Swiss Federal Institute of Forestry Research, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. Radwanski SA and Wickens GE (1967) The ecology of Acacia albida on mantle soils in Zalingei, Jebel Marra, Sudan. Journal of Applied Ecology 4(2):569–579Google Scholar
  15. Rambo AT (1981) Orang Asli adaptive strategies: implications for Malaysian Natural Resource Development planning. EAPI Preprint, East-West Center, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  16. Rappaport RA (1971) The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Scientific American 255(3):116–132Google Scholar
  17. Rice D (1981) Upland agricultural development in the Philippines: an analysis and a report on Ikalahan programs. In: Olofson, Harold, ed, Adaptive Strategies and Change in Phlippine Swidden-Based Societies, Los Banos: Forest Research Institute. pp 73–90Google Scholar
  18. Richards P (1985) Indigenous Agricultural Revolution. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Rusten E (1989) An investigation of an indigenous knowledge system and management practices of tree fodder resources in the Middle Hills of Central Nepal. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Forestry, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Salisbury RF (1962) From Stone to Steel. London, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Spradley JP (1980) Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart & WinstonGoogle Scholar
  22. Werner O and Schoepfle GM (1987) Systematic Fieldwork: Foundations of Ethnography and Interviewing. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Whyte A (1977) Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. MAB Technical Notes, 5 Paris, UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilken GC (1977) Integrating forest and small scale farm systems in Middle America. Agroforestry Ecosystems 13:291–302 Wormald TJ and Russell TD (1976) An account of the Salija Forest inventory. Lumle Agricultural Centre, MimeoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric P. Rusten
    • 1
  • Michael A. Gold
    • 2
  1. 1.Rural Poverty and Resources ProgramNairobi office of the Ford FoundationMichiganUSA
  2. 2.International Forestry Program, Forestry DepartmentMichigan State UniversityMichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations