Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 71–89 | Cite as

Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. II. Nutrient cycling

  • Om Parkash Toky
  • Pradeep Kumar
  • Prem Kumar Khosla
Article

Abstract

Budget of nutrient in plant and soil, and their rates of recycling in three types of traditional agroforestry systems in mid elevations of the western Himalaya were studied. Concentration of nitrogen and potassium was significantly higher in fruits and leaves than in branches, boles, and litter. Grewia optiva, an important fodder tree, was found to be rich in potassium, vegetable crops in nitrogen, and weeds in phosphorus. Maximum store of nutrients was estimated in aboveground biomass of agrihortisilvicultural system: nitrogen 532, phosphorus 40, potassium 461, calcium 400, and magnesium 298 kg/ha; it was closely followed by that in agrihorticultural system, and both these had sbout 2-fold higher nutrient stock as compared to agrisilvicultural system. In the case of the former two systems, considerable quantity of nutrients up to nitrogen 169, phosphorus 14, potassium 165, calcium 97, and magnesium 65 kg/ha, for example in agrihortisilvicultural system, was recycled through debris of crops and weeds, and tree leaf litter, while the recycling rate was almost half in agrisilvicultural system. Through ‘harvest’ potassium was depleted in the largest quantity from the system, followed by nitrogen, magnesium, calcium, and phosphorus; much higher loss occurred through agricultural and/or horticultural edible parts as compared to fuel and fodder biomass. For example, the loss through agricultural crops and horticultural fruits for nitrogen in agrihortisilvicultural system was up to 75 percent and 38 percent respectively of the total annual uptake. This heavy loss makes the system unstable from a nutrient point of view particularly for nitrogen and potassium until external inputs are added through organic and inorganic fertilizers. Agrihortisilvicultural system is remarkably efficient in view of biomass productivity for fuel, fodder and fruits, and also from nutrient point of view provided losses through harvest are compensated externally.

Key words

Western Himalaya agroforestry systems nutrient budget allocation pattern nutrient-cycling soil fertility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA and Quarmby C (1974) Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aweto AO (1981) Secondary succession and soil fertility restoration in southwestern Nigeria. II. Soil fertility restoration. J Ecol 69: 609–614Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bray P and Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59: 39–45Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Standards Institution (1967) Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes. British Standard 1377, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buschbacher R, Uhl C and Serrao EAS (1988) Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia. II. Nutrient stocks in the soil and vegetation. J Ecol 76: 682–699Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards PJ and Grubb PJ (1982) Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea. IV. Soil characteristics and the division of mineral elements between the vegetation and soil. J Ecol 70: 649–666Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fassbender HW, Alpizar L, Heuveldop J, Fölster H and Enriquez G (1988) Modelling agroforestry systems of cacao (Theobroma cacao) with laurel (Cordia alliodora) and poro (Erythrina poeppigiana) in Costa Rica. III. Cycles of organic matter and nutrients. Agroforestry Systems 6: 49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fillku EJ and Klinge H (1973) On biomass and trophic structure of Central Amazonian forest ecosystem. Biotropica 5: 2–14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glover N and Beer J (1986) Nutrient cycling in two traditional Central American agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 4: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golley FB, McGinnis JT, Clements RG, Child GI and Duever MJ (1975) Mineral Cycling in a Tropical Moist Forest Ecosystem. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grewal SS and Abrol IP (1986) Agroforestry on alkali soils: effect of some management practices on initial growth, biomass accumulation, and chemical composition of selected tree species. Agroforestry Systems 4: 221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jordan CF and Kline JR (1972) Mineral cycling: some basic concepts and their application in a tropical rain forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3: 33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang BT and Juo ASR (1986) Effect of land clearing on soil chemical properties and crop performance. In: Lal R, Sanchez PA and Cummings Jr RW (eds) Land Clearing and Development in the Tropics, pp 383–394. Rotterdam, AA BalkemaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khosla PK and Toky OP (1985) Renewed scientific interest in agroforestry. In: Khosla PK, Khurana DK and Puri S (eds) Agroforestry Systems: A New Challenge, pp 7–23, Indian Society of Tree Scientists, Solan, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lundren B (1978) Soil conditions and nutrient cycling under natural and plantation forests in Tanzanian highlands. Report in For Ecol and For Soils 31. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppasalaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundren B and Nair PKR (1985) Agroforestry for soil conservation. In: El-Swaify SA, Moldenhauer WC and Lo A (eds) Soil Erosion and Conservation, pp 703–717. Soil Conservation Society of North America, Ankeny, IowaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maghembe JA, Kariuki EM and Haller RD (1983) Biomass and nutrient accumulation in young Prosopis juliflora at Mombasa, Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 1: 313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    von Maydell HJ (1987) Agroforestry in the dry zone of Africa: past, present, and future. In: Steppler HA and Nair PKR (eds) Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, pp 89–116, ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mongi HO and Huxley PA (eds) (1979) Soils Research in Agroforestry. ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nair PKR (1984) Soil Productivity Aspects of Agroforestry. ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nye PH and Greenland DJ (1960) The Soil Under Shifting Cultivation. Technical Communication, No. 51, Commonw Bur Soils, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramakrishnan PS and Toky OP (1981) Soil nutrient status of hill agro-ecosystems and recovery pattern after slash and burn agriculture (jhum) in north-eastern India. Plant Soil 60: 41–64Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reiners WA and Reiners NM (1970) Energy and nutrient dynamics of forest floors in three Minnesota forests. J Ecol 58: 497–519Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanchez PA and Buol SW (1975) Soils of the tropics and the world food crisis. Sci 188: 598–603Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sanchez PA, Palm CA, Davey CB, Szott LT and Russell CE (1985) Trees as soil improvers in the humid tropics? In: Cannell MGR and Jackson JE (eds) Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants. Inst Terrestrial Ecol, Huntington, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanchez PA (1987) Soil productivity and sustainability in agroforestry systems. In: Steppler HA and Nair PKR (eds) Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, pp 205–223 ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toky OP and Ramakrishnan PS (1981) Runoff and infiltration losses related to shifting agriculture (jhum) in north-eastern India. Environ Conserv 8: 313–321Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toky OP and Ramakrishnan PS (1982) Role of bamboo (Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Nees and Arn.) in conservation of potassium during slash and burn agriculture (jhum) in north-eastern India. J Tree Sci 1: 17–26Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toky OP and Ramakrishnan PS (1983a) Secondary succession following slash and burn agriculture in north-eastern India. I. Biomass, litterfall, and productivity. J Ecol 71: 735–745Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Toky OP and Ramakrishnan PS (1983b) Secondary succession following slash and burn agriculture in north-eastern India. II. Nutrient cycling. J Ecol 71: 747–757Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Toky OP, Kumar P and Khosla PK (1989) Structure and function of traditional agroforestry systems in the western Himalaya. I. Biomass and productivity. Agroforestry Systems: 9: 47–70Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vitousek PM and Sanford Jr RL (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 137–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Werner P (1984) Changes in soil properties during tropical wet forest succession in Costa Rica. Biotropica 16: 43–50Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH and Houghton RA (1975) Nutrient concentrations in plants in the Brookhaven oak-pine forest. Ecol 56: 318–332Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Young A (1986) The Potential of Agroforestry for Soil Conservation. I. Erosion Control. II. Maintenance of Fertility. ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zinke PJ, Sabhasri S and Kunstadter P (1978) Soil fertility aspects of the ‘Lua’ forest fallow system of shifting cultivation. In: Kunstadter P, Chapman EC and Sabhasri S (eds) Farmers in the Forest, pp 134–159. University Press of Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Om Parkash Toky
    • 1
  • Pradeep Kumar
    • 2
  • Prem Kumar Khosla
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ForestryHaryana Agricultural UniversityHisarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Tree Improvement and Genetic ResourcesDr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and ForestryP.O. Nauni (Solan)India

Personalised recommendations