Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 59–82 | Cite as

An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision

  • Noel Capon
  • Gavan J. Fitzsimons
  • Russ Alan Prince


This study investigates the manner in which consumers make investment decisions for mutual funds. Investors report that they consider many nonperformance related variables. When investors are grouped by similarity of investment decision process, a single small group appears to be highly knowledgeable about its investments. However, most investors appear to be naive, having little knowledge of the investment strategies or financial details of their investments. Implications for mutual fund companies are discussed.


Decision Process Small Group Related Variable Investment Decision Mutual Fund 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldenderfer, Mark S., and Roger K., Blashfield “Cluster Analysis” In: Michael S., Lewis-Beck, ed., Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage University Papers, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. ThomasJr., Eli P., CoxIII, and David G., Fulcher. “Bank Selection Decisions and Market Segmentation”. Journal of Marketing 40 (January 1976), 40–45.Google Scholar
  3. Berning, Carol A., and John, Jacoby. “Patterns of Information Acquisition in New Product Purchases”. Journal of Consumer Research 1 (September 1974), 18–22.Google Scholar
  4. Bettman, James R. An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 1979Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, J. William. “The Changing Face of Consumer Banking” Journal of Retail Banking 12 (Fall 1990), 9–18.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Stephen J., William N., Goetzmann Roger G., Ibbotson, Stephen A., Ross. “Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies”. Review of Financial Studies 5 (1992), 553–580.Google Scholar
  7. Business Week. “The Power of Mutual Funds”. Business Week (January 18, 1993).Google Scholar
  8. Capon, Noel. The Marketing of Financial Services A Book of Cases Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992, 137–157.Google Scholar
  9. Capon, Noel, and Marion, Burke. “Individual, Product Class and Task-Related Factors in Consumer Information Processing”. Journal of Consumer Research 7 (December, 1980), 314–326.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, Peter. “Upgrading the Retail Customer Mix”. Journal of Retail Banking 12 (Winter 1990), 25–29.Google Scholar
  11. Connolly, Jim. “Mutual Fund Sales Up for Year, Down for Qtr.” National Underwriter 94 (52) (1990), 2–6.Google Scholar
  12. Consumer Reports, “Survey Research Report: Mutual Fund Survey.” Unpublished manuscript. 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Crosby, Lawrence A., and Nancy, Stephens, “Effects of Relationship Marketing on Satisfaction, Retention, and Prices in the Life Insurance Industry.” Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November, 1987), 404–411.Google Scholar
  14. De, Long, B., Andrei, Shleifer, Lawrence H., Summers, and R., Waldman. “Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990), 703–708.Google Scholar
  15. Del, Prete, Dom. “Financial Firms Loaded with Ways to Market No-Load Mutual Funds.” Marketing News 25 (14)(1991), 7–10.Google Scholar
  16. Dermine, J., and L., Roller. “Economies of Scale and Scope in the French Mutual Funds (SICAV) Industry.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 2 (1992), 83–93.Google Scholar
  17. Dunn, Patricia C., and Rolf, D. Theisen. “How Consistently Do Active Managers Win.” Journal of Portfolio Management 9 (1983), 47–50.Google Scholar
  18. Eaton, Leslie, “Peering Into the Future: What's in the Offing for Mutual Funds.” Barron's 71 (22) (1991), 43–44.Google Scholar
  19. Elton, Edwin J., and Martin J., Gruber. Modern Portfolio Theory and Empirical Work, New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1989.Google Scholar
  20. Engle, James F., Roger D., Blackwell, and Paul W., Miniard. Consumer Behavior. New York: Dryden Press. 1986.Google Scholar
  21. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1957.Google Scholar
  22. Fishbein, Martin, and Icek, Azjen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing. 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Goetzmann, William N., and Nadav Peles. “Cognitive Dissonance and Mutual Fund Investors.” Working paper, Columbia Business School. 1994.Google Scholar
  24. Goetzmann, William N. and Stephen Brown. “Attrition and Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence from a Survivorship-Bias Free Database.” Working paper, Columbia Business School. 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Goetzmann, William N., Bruce Greenwald and Gur Huberman. “Market Response to Mutual Fund Performance.” Working paper, Columbia Business School. 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Goetzmann, Williams N. and Roger, G. Ibbotson. “Do Winners Repeat? Patterns in Mutual Fund Behavior.” Journal of Portfolio Analysis 20 (1994), 9–18.Google Scholar
  27. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan, Titman. “Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings.” Journal of Business 62 (July 1989), 393–416.Google Scholar
  28. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan, Titman. “The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance 47 (1992), 1977–1984.Google Scholar
  29. Gupta, Sunil. “Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy.” Journal of Marketing Research 25 (November 1988), 342–355.Google Scholar
  30. Hartman, David E., and David K., SmithJr. “Building a Competitive Advantage in Mutual Fund Sales.” Journal of Retail Banking 12 (Fall 1990), 43–49.Google Scholar
  31. Hendricks, Darryl, Jayendu, Patel, and Richard, Zeckhauser. “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: The Persistence of Performance, 1974–88” Journal of Finance 48 (1993), 552–580.Google Scholar
  32. Howard, John A., and Jagdish, Sheth. The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  33. Ippolito, Richard A., “Efficiency With Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fund Performance, 1965–1984.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (February 1989), 1–23.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, Michael. “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964.” Journal of Finance 23 (1968), 389–416.Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos, Tversky. “Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (1974), 1124–1131.Google Scholar
  36. Lancaster, Kelvin J. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy (1966), 132–157.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, Charles M. C., Andrei, Shleifer, and Richard, Thaler “Investor Sentiment and the Closed-end Fund Puzzle.” Journal of Finance 46 (March 1991), 75–109.Google Scholar
  38. Lehmann, Bruce N., and David M., Modest ”Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons.” Journal of Finance 42 (June 1987), 233–265.Google Scholar
  39. Leigh, James H., and Claude R., MartinJr. “Don't Know Item Nonresponse in a Telephone Survey: Effects of Question Form and Respondent Characteristics.” Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November 1987), 418–424.Google Scholar
  40. Lucey, Arthur J. “What Band Services Do Small Business Want?” Commercial Lending Review 5 (3) (1990), 92–94.Google Scholar
  41. Markowitz, Henry. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1959.Google Scholar
  42. McGuire, William J., “Attitudes and Attitude Changes.” In: Gardner, Lindzey and Elliott, Aronson, eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Random House, 1985, 233–346.Google Scholar
  43. McManus, John. “Mutual Funds Are Bullish on Ads.” Advertising Age 61 (32) (1990), 13.Google Scholar
  44. McRae, D. J., MKCA: A Fortran IV K-Means Cluster Analysis Program. Monterey, CA.: CTB/McGraw Hill. 1970.Google Scholar
  45. Maheswaran, Durairaj, and Joan, Meyers-Levy “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement.” Journal of Marketing Research 27 (August 1990), 361–367.Google Scholar
  46. Murray, Keith B. “A Test of Services Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition Activities.” Journal of Marketing 55 (January 1991), 10–25.Google Scholar
  47. Mutual Fund Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: Investment Co. Institute. 1990.Google Scholar
  48. Mutual Fund Fact Book. Washington, D.C.: Investment Co. Institute. 1993.Google Scholar
  49. Patel, Jayendu, Richard Zeckhauser, and Darryl Hendricks. “Investment Flows and Performance: Evidence from Mutual Funds, Cross Border Investments and New Issues” Working paper, Harvard University. 1992.Google Scholar
  50. Punj, Girish, and David, Stewart. “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application.” Journal of Marketing Research 20 (May 1983), 134–148.Google Scholar
  51. Queenen, Joe. “Missed Messages: Fund Ads Usually Don't Pack a Wallop.” Barron's 71 (6) (1991), M15-M16.Google Scholar
  52. Sharpe, W. “Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Business 39 (1966), 119–138.Google Scholar
  53. Sirri, Erik R., and P. Tufano. “Buying and Selling Mutual Funds: Flows Performance, Fees, and Services.” Working paper, Harvard Business School, 1992.Google Scholar
  54. Surprenant, Carol F., and Michael R., Solomon. “Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter.” Journal of Marketing 51 (April 1987), 86–96.Google Scholar
  55. Vinson, Donald E., and Wayne, McVandon. “Developing a Market for a New E.F.T.S. Bank Service.” Journal of Marketing 42 (April 1978), 83–86.Google Scholar
  56. Vosti, Curtis. “The Scramble's On for Mutual Fund Business.” Pensions & Investments 19 (10) (1991), 16–22.Google Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, Kim Ann. “Putting a Label on Mutual Funds.” United States Banker 101 (7) (1991), 53–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel Capon
    • 1
  • Gavan J. Fitzsimons
    • 2
  • Russ Alan Prince
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessColumbia UniversityNew York
  2. 2.Anderson Graduate School of ManagementUCLALos Angeles
  3. 3.Prince and AssociatesStratford

Personalised recommendations