Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 495–527 | Cite as

Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model

  • James W. Deardorff


Results of a three-dimensional numerical model are analysed in a study of turbulence and entrainment within mixed layers containing stratocumulus with or without parameterized cloud-top radiative cooling. The model eliminates most of the assumptions invoked in theories of cloud-capped mixed layers, but suffers disadvantages which include poor resolution and large truncation errors in and above the capping inversion.

For relatively thick mixed layers with relatively thick capping inversions, the cloud-top radiative cooling is found to be lodged mostly within the capping inversion when the cooling is confined locally to the upper 50 m or less of the cloud. It does not then contribute substantially towards increased buoyancy flux and turbulence within the well mixed layer just below.

The optimal means of correlating the entrainment rate, or mixed-layer growth rate, for mixed layers of variable amounts of stratocumulus is found to be through functional dependence upon an overall jump Richardson number, utilizing as scaling velocity the standard deviation of vertical velocity existing at the top of the mixed layer (near the center of the capping inversion). This velocity is found to be a fraction of the generalized convective velocity for the mixed layer as a whole which is greater for cloud-capped mixed layers than for clear mixed layers.


Numerical Model Mixed Layer Vertical Velocity Functional Dependence Variable Amount 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albrecht, B. A., Betts, A. K., Schubert, W. H., and Cox, S. K.: 1979, ‘A Model of the Thermodynamic Structure of the Trade-Wind Boundary Layer: Part I. Theoretical Formulation and Sensitivity Tests’, J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 73–89.Google Scholar
  2. André, J. C., De Moor, G., Lacarrère, P., and du Vachat, R.: 1976, ‘Turbulence Approximation for Inhomogeneous Flows: Part II. The Numerical Simulation of a Penetrative Convection Experiment’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 482–491.Google Scholar
  3. Arakawa, A.: 1966, ‘Computational Design for Long-Term Numerical Integration of the Equations of Fluid Motion: Two-dimensional Incompressible Flow, Part I’, J. Comp. Phys. 1, 119–143.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, F. K.: 1960, ‘Control of Inversion Height by Surface Heating’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 483–494.Google Scholar
  5. Betts, A. K.: 1973, ‘Non-precipitating Cumulus Convection and its Parameterization’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 178–196.Google Scholar
  6. Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, ‘Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–189.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, R. H., Dyer, A. J., Brook, R. R., Reid, D. G., and Troup, A. J.: 1971, ‘The Wangara Experiment: Boundary Layer Data’, CSIRO Div. of Meteorol. Phys. Tech. Paper No. 19, 340 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Coulman, C. E.: 1978, ‘Convection in Stratiform Cloud’, J. Rech. Atmos. 12, 21–33.Google Scholar
  9. Deardorff, J. W.: ‘Convective Velocity and Temperature Scales for the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 1211–1213.Google Scholar
  10. Deardorff, J. W.: ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81–106.Google Scholar
  11. Deardorff, J. W.: 1974b, ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Turbulence in an Entraining Mixed Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 199–226.Google Scholar
  12. Deardorff, J. W.: 1976a, ‘On the Entrainment Rate of a Stratocumulus-Topped Mixed Layer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 563–582.Google Scholar
  13. Deardorff, J. W.: 1976b, ‘Usefulness of Liquid-Water Potential Temperature in a Shallow-Cloud Model’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 15, 98–102.Google Scholar
  14. Deardorff, J. W.: 1976c, ‘Clear and Cloud-Capped Mixed Layers: Their Numerical Simulation, Structure and Growth and Parameterization’, in Seminars on the Treatment of the Boundary Layer in Numerical Weather Prediction, European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, England, 6–10 Sept. 1976, 234–284.Google Scholar
  15. Deafdorff, J. W.: 1980. ‘Cloudtop Entrainment Instability’, J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 131–147.Google Scholar
  16. Findikakis, A. N. and Street, R. L.: 1979, ‘An Algebraic Model for Sub-grid-scale Turbulence in Stratified Flows’, J. Atmos. Sci. 36, 1934–1949.Google Scholar
  17. Kahn, P. H. and Businger, J. A.: 1979, ‘The Effect of Radiative Flux Divergence on Entrainment of a Saturated Convective Boundary Layer’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 105, 303–305.Google Scholar
  18. Kato, H., and Phillips, O. M.: 1969, ‘On the Penetration of a Turbulent Layer into Stratified Fluid’, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 643–655.Google Scholar
  19. Kraus, H. and Schaller, E.: 1978a, ‘Steady-State Characteristics of Inversions Capping a Well-Mixed Planetary Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 14, 83–104.Google Scholar
  20. Kraus, H. and Schaller, E.: 1978b, ‘A Note on the Closure in Lilly-Type Inversion Models’, Tellus 30, 84–88.Google Scholar
  21. Lilly, D. K.: 1975, ‘On the Computational Stability of Numerical Solutions of Time-dependent Non-linear Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Problems’, Monthly Weather Rev. 93, 11–26.Google Scholar
  22. Lilly, D. K.: 1968, ‘Models of cloud-topped Mixed Layers under a Strong Inversion’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 292–309.Google Scholar
  23. Manabe, S.: 1969, ‘Climate and the Ocean Circulation, I. The Atmospheric Circulation and the Hydrology of the Earth's Surface’, Monthly Weather Rev. 97, 739–805.Google Scholar
  24. McEwan, A. D. and Paltridge, G. W.: 1976, ‘Radiatively Driven Thermal Convection Bounded by an Inversion - a Laboratory Simulation of Stratus Clouds’, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1095–1102.Google Scholar
  25. Mellor, G. L.: 1977 ‘The Gaussian Cloud Model Relations’, J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 356–358.Google Scholar
  26. Oliver, D. A., Lewellen, W. S., and Williamson, G. G.: 1978, ‘The Interaction between Turbulent and Radiative Transport in the Development of Fog and Low-Level Stratus’, J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 301–316.Google Scholar
  27. Randall, D. A.: 1979, ‘On the Entraining Moist Boundary Layer, Part I. Conditional Instability of the First Kind Upside-down’, submitted to J. Atmos. Sci. Google Scholar
  28. Schubert, W. H.: 1976, ‘Experiments with Lilly's Cloud-topped Mixed Layer Model’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 436–446.Google Scholar
  29. Sommeria, G.: 1976, ‘Three-Dimensional Simulation of Turbulent Processes in an Undistrubed Trade Wind Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 216–241.Google Scholar
  30. Sommeria, G. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1977, ‘Subgrid-Scale Condensation in Models of Nonprecipitating Clouds’, J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 344–355.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, J. S.: 1968, ‘The Influence of Molecular Diffusivity on Turbulent Entrainment across a Density Interface’, J. Fluid Mech. 23, 639–656.Google Scholar
  32. Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘A Laboratory Model of the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1297–1307.Google Scholar
  33. Zeman, O. and Lumley, J. L.: 1976, ‘Modeling Buoyancy Driven Mixed Layers’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1974–1988.Google Scholar
  34. Zeman, O. and Tennekes, H.: 1977, ‘Parameterization of the Turbulent Energy Budget at the Top of the Daytime Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 111–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Deardorff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations