Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 177–192 | Cite as

Growth and resource utilization of perennial pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) at the tree-crop interface

  • J. N. Daniel
  • C. K. Ong
  • M. S. Kumar


Perennial pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) was grown as a multipurpose tree species in strips or blocks with annual crops (sorghum, sunflower and chickpea) on a shallow Vertisol from 1987 to 1989. The interaction between the perennial pigeonpea and annual crops was measured at the tree-crop interface (TCI) by comparing the plants at the interface (I) and in the middle of the block planting (N).

Perennial pigeonpea I plants had significantly more branches and bigger stems than N plants at the onset of the following rainy season. The greater number of flowers and grains of the I pigeonpea plants was partly due to a better lateral light level and partly due to a better access to water. On the other hand the negative effect on annual crops at the TCI extended to 1.5 m during the rainy season and to 2.5 m during the post-rainy season. Significant reduction in the growth of annual crops occurred at 30–40 days after sowing and was associated with the shading by the taller pigeonpea. Measurements of root profile of pigeonpea at the interface indicated that competition for moisture was the major cause for yield reduction of chickpea during the post-rainy season but an allelopathetic effect may also be involved. The results are compared with other TCI studies especially with Leucaena leucocephala in the semi-arid crops and the possible mechanisms for moisture interaction at the TCI are discussed.

Key words

tree-crop interface resource utilization perennial pigeonpea sunflower chickpea semi-arid tropics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cannell MG (1983) Plant management. In: Huxley PA, ed, Plant Research and Agroforestry, pp 445–488. ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Daniel JN and Ong CK (1990) Perennial pigeonpea: a multipurpose species for agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 10: 113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gregory PJ and Reddy MS (1979) Root growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research 5: 241–252Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huxley PA (1983) The tree-crop interface approach. Section A. Part 4D In: Huxley PA, ed, Methodology for the Exploration and Assessment of Multipurpose Trees. ICRAF, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huxley PA, Darnhofer T, Pinney A, Akunda E and Gatama D (1989) The tree/crop interface: a project designed to generate experimental methodology. Agroforestry Abstracts 4: 127–145Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monteith JL, Ong CK and Corlett JE (1991) Miroclimatic interactions in agroforestry systems. Proceedings of Agroforestry: Principles and Practice, University of Edinburgh, UK (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ong CK, Campbell GS and Khan AA (1991) A heat balance technique for measuring transpiration of small trees and crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao MR, Sharma MM and Ong CK (1991) A tree/crop interface design and its use for evaluating the potential of hedgerow intercropping. Agroforestry Systems 13: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh RP, Ong CK and Saharan N (1989) Above and below ground interactions in alley cropping in semi-arid India. Agroforestry Systems 9: 259–274Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thirathon A, Byth DG, Fischer KS and Whiteman (1987) Compensatory ability of pigeonpea to a reduction in sink capacity. In: Food Legume Improvement for Asian Farming Systems: Proceedings of an International Workshop held at Khon Kaen, Thailand, 1–5 September 1986, p 253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. N. Daniel
    • 1
  • C. K. Ong
    • 1
  • M. S. Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)Andhra PradeshIndia

Personalised recommendations