, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 103–114

Contaminant concentrations in Illinois mink and otter

  • Richard S. Halbrook
  • A. Woolf
  • G. F. HubertJr
  • S. Ross
  • W. E. Braselton

Mink and otters are valuable wildlife resources and management efforts in North America and Europe have been directed towards re-establishing extirpated populations or expanding existing populations. The similarity of otter and mink habits and trophic status may allow inferences about the suitability of the habitat that is occupied by one species (mink) for the other species that is absent (otter). Remnant otter populations in Illinois have not expanded even though suitable habitat appears to be available and is occupied by mink. Low contaminant concentrations in tissues of mink trapped in a habitat where otters are not found and metal and organochlorine concentrations in tissues of otters incidentally collected by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, suggest that environmental contaminants should not hinder natural expansion of otters in Illinois.


mink (Mustela visionotter (Lutra canadensismetals organochlorines 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams S.M. (1990) Status and use of biological indicators for evaluating the effects of stress on fish. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 8, 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson-Bledsoe K.L. and Scanlon P.F. (1983) Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of Virginia river otters. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30, 442–7.Google Scholar
  3. Aulerich R.J. and Ringer R.K. (1979) Toxic effects of dietary polybrominated biphenyls on mink. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 8, 487–98.Google Scholar
  4. Aulerich R.J., Ringer R.K. and Iwamoto S. (1974) Effects of dietary mercury on mink. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2, 43–51.Google Scholar
  5. Bluett, R.D. and Hubert, G.F., Jr (1991) Fur Harvest Survey, 1990–91. Ill. Dept. of Conserv.Google Scholar
  6. Blus L.J., Henny C.J. and Mulhern B.M. (1987) Concentrations of metals in mink and other mammals from Washington and Idaho. Environ. Pollut. 44, 307–18.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L.G. and Yeager, L.E. (1943) Survey of the Illinois fur resource. Ill. Nat. History Surv.Google Scholar
  8. Calabrese E.J., Aulerich R.J. and Padgett G.A. (1992) Mink as a predictive model in toxicology. Drug Metab. Rev. 24, 559–78.Google Scholar
  9. Chanin P.R.F. and Jefferies D.J. (1978) The decline of the otter (Lutra lutra) in Britain: an analysis of hunting records and discussion of causes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10, 305–28.Google Scholar
  10. Cranbrook (1977) The status of otter (L. lutra L.) in Britain in 1977. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 9, 305–22.Google Scholar
  11. Erickson, D.W. (1981) Furbearer harvest mechanics: an examination of variables influencing fur harvests in Missouri. In J.A., Chapman and D., Pursley (eds) The Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings. Maryland: Worldwide Furbearer Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Foley R.E., Rackling S.J., Sloan R.J. and Brown M.K. (1988) Organochlorine and mercury residues in wild mink and otter: comparison with fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7, 363–74.Google Scholar
  13. Halbrook R.S., Jenkins J.H., Bush P.B. and Seabolt N.D. (1994) Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: monitoring environmental contamination. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 27, 306–10.Google Scholar
  14. Henny, C.J., Blus, L.J., Gregory, S.V. and Stafford, C.J. (1981) PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in wild mink and river otters from Oregon. In J.A., Chapman and D., Pursley (eds) The Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings. Maryland: Worldwide Furbearer Conference.Google Scholar
  15. Hill E.P. and Lovett J.W. (1975) Pesticide residues in beaver and river otter from Alabama. Proc. Ann. Conf. Southeast Assoc. Game Fish Comm. 29, 365–9.Google Scholar
  16. Hubert G.F. (1985) Managing the mink. Outdoor Highlights 13, 14–15.Google Scholar
  17. IESPB (1994) Checklist of Endangered and Threatened Animals and Plants of Illinois. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board, Illinois Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  18. Jenkins J.H. (1983) The status and management of the river otter (Lutra canadensis) in North America. Acta. Zool. Fennica 174, 233–5.Google Scholar
  19. Kucera E. (1983) Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can. J. Zool. 61, 2250–6.Google Scholar
  20. Leonards, P.E.G., Smit, M.D., de Jongh, A.W.J.J. and van Hattum, B.G.M. (1994) Evaluation of Dose-Response Relationships for the Effects of PCBs on the Reproduction of Mink (Mustela vision). Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University of Amsterdam, Dutch Otterstation Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Mason C.F. (1989) Water pollution and otter distribution: a review. Lutra 32, 97–131.Google Scholar
  22. O'Connor, D.J. and Nielsen, S.W. (1981) Environmental survey of methylmercury levels in wild mink (Mustela vision) and otter (Lutra canadensis) from the northeastern United States and experimental pathology of methylmercurialism in the otter. In J.A., Chapman and D., Pursley (eds) The Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings. Maryland: Worldwide Furbearer Conference.Google Scholar
  23. Ogle M.C., Scanlon P.F., Kirkpatrick R.L. and Gwynn J.V. (1985). Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of mink in Virginia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35, 29–37.Google Scholar
  24. Ringer R.K. (1983) Toxicology of PCBs in mink and ferrets. In F.M. Dlltri and M.A. Kamrin (eds) PCBs: human and environmental hazards. Boston: Butterworth Pub.Google Scholar
  25. Smit, M.D., Leonards, P.E.G., van Hattum, B. and de Jongh, A.W.J.J. (1994) PCBs in European otter (Lutra lutra) populations. Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University of Amsterdam, Dutch Otterstation Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Stejskal S.M., Aulerich R.J., Slanker M.R., Braselton W.E., Lehning E.J. and Napolitano A.C. (1989) Element concentrations in livers and kidneys of ranch mink. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 1, 343–8.Google Scholar
  27. Stowe H.D., Braselton W.E., Kaneene W.E. and Slanker M. (1985) Multielement assays of bovine tissue specimens by inductively coupled argon plasma emission spectroscopy. Am. J. Vet. Res. 46, 561–5.Google Scholar
  28. Wren C.D. (1985) Probable case of mercury poisoning in a wild otter, Lutra canadensis, in northwestern Ontario. Can. Field-Nat. 99, 112–14.Google Scholar
  29. Wren C.D., Stokes P.M. and Fischer K.L. (1986) Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidification. Can. J. Zool. 64, 2854–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard S. Halbrook
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Woolf
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. F. HubertJr
    • 3
  • S. Ross
    • 4
  • W. E. Braselton
    • 5
  1. 1.Cooperative Wildlife Research LaboratorySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Illinois Department of Natural ResourcesHinckleyUSA
  4. 4.Animal Disease LaboratoryCentraliaUSA
  5. 5.Animal Health Diagnostic LaboratoryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations