Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Radiative surface temperature and energy balance of a wheat canopy

I. Comparison of radiative and aerodynamic canopy temperature
  • N. D. S. Huband
  • J. L. Monteith


For a stand of winter wheat, radiative canopy temperature measured with an infra-red radiometer was systematically related to a surface temperature derived from air temperature and wind speed profiles. Radiative temperature changed significantly with viewing angle and azimuth, but the influences of sun angle and ground cover were minimised by inclining the radiometer at 55 ° to the vertical and at right angles to the solar beam.

At a standard viewing angle of 55 ° to the zenith, radiative canopy temperature was consistently 1 K cooler than the aerodynamic temperature. The algorithm used to describe this relation contains an effective canopy emissivity which decreases with viewing angle and an effective reflectivity. The observations establish a basis for incorporating canopy surface temperature into formulae for estimating the sensible heat loss from vegetation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Businger, J.: 1974, ‘Aerodynamics of Vegetated Surfaces’, in D. A. de Vries and N. H. Afgan (eds.), Heat and Mass Transfer in the Biosphere, and John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, J. A.: 1976, ‘Energy Transfer and Surface Temperature Over Plants and Animals’, in G. C. Evans (ed.), Light as an Ecological Factor, Vol. II.Google Scholar
  3. Deacon, E. L.: 1950, ‘The Measurement and Recording of the Heat Flux Into the Soil’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 76, 479–483.Google Scholar
  4. Fuchs, M. and Tanner, C. B.: 1966, ‘Intra-Red Thermometry of Vegetation’, Agron. J. 58, 597–601.Google Scholar
  5. Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E. T., Kerr, J. P., and Tanner, C. B.: 1967, ‘The Effect of Viewing Angle on Canopy Temperature Measurements With Infra-Red Thermometers’, Agron. J. 59, 494–496.Google Scholar
  6. Gates, D. M. and Tantraporn, W.: 1952, ‘Reflectivity of Deciduous Trees and Herbaceous Plants in the Intra-Red to 25 Μm’, Science 115, 613–616Google Scholar
  7. Huband, N. D. S.: 1983, ‘The Measurement and Interpretation of Crop Surface Temperature’, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  8. Huband, N. D. S.: 1985a, ‘An Infra-Red Radiometer for Measuring Surface Temperature in the Field, Part 1: Design and Construction’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 34, 215–226.Google Scholar
  9. Huband, N. D. S.: 1985b, ‘An Infra-Red Radiometer for Measuring Surface Temperature in the Field, Part 2: Calibration and Performance’, Agric. For Meteorol. 34, 227–233.Google Scholar
  10. Idso, S. B., Jackson, R. D., Ehrler, W. L., and Mitchell, S. T.: 1969, ‘A Method for Determining the Infra-Red Emittance of Leaves’, Ecology 50, 899–902.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, R. D.: 1982, ‘Canopy Temperature and Crop Water Stress’, in D. Hillel (ed.), Adv. Irrigation, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kimes, D. S., Idso, S. B., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J., and Jackson, R. D.: 1980, ‘View Angle Effects in the Radiometric Measurement of Plant Canopy Temperatures’, Rem. Sens, of Environ. 10, 273–284.Google Scholar
  13. Monteith, J. L.: 1963, ‘Gas Exchange in Plant Communities’, in L. T. Evans (ed.), Environmental Control of Plant Growth, Academic Press, New York, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
  14. Monteith, J. L.: 1973, Principles of Environmental Physics, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  15. Monteith, J. L. and Szeicz, G.: 1962, ‘Radiative Temperature in the Heat Balance of Natural Surfaces’, Quart. J. R. Meteorol Soc. 88, 496–507.Google Scholar
  16. Munro, D. S.: 1980, ‘A Portable Diffusion Psychrometer System’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 19, 206–214.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, N. J. and Brown, K. W.: 1974, ‘Self-Checking Psychrometer System for Gradient and Profile Systems Near the Ground’, Agric. Meteorol. 13, 215–226.Google Scholar
  18. Soer, G. J. R.: 1980, ‘Estimating Regional Evapo-Transpiration and Soil Moisture Conditions Using Remotely Sensed Crop Surface Temperatures’, Rem. Sens, of Environ. 9, 27–45.Google Scholar
  19. Sutherland, R. A. and Bartholic, J. F.: 1977, ‘Significance of Vegetation in Interpreting Thermal Radiation From a Terrestrial Surface’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 16, 759–763.Google Scholar
  20. Thom, A. S.: 1975, ‘Momentum, Mass, and Heat Exchange of Vegetation’, in J. L. M. Monteith (ed.), Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Vol. I, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  21. Watmough, D. J., Fowler, P. W., and Oliver, R.: 1970, ‘The Thermal Scanning of a Curved Isothermal Surface; Implications for Clinical Thermography’, Phys. Med. Biol. 15, 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. D. S. Huband
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. L. Monteith
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Environmental ScienceUniversity of Nottingham, School of AgricultureSutton BoningtonUK
  2. 2.Crop Protection DivisionUniv. of Bristol, Dept. of Agricultural Sciences, Long Ashton Research StationBristolUK
  3. 3.Laboratory for Terrestrial Physics, NASA/Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations