Machine Learning

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 243–248 | Cite as

Editorial: Human and machine learning

  • Pat Langley
Article

Summary

Although science can be characterized in terms of search, some search methods let one explore multiple paths in parallel. We have argued that more machine learning researchers should focus their efforts on modeling human behavior, but we have not argued that the field should limit itself to this approach. For those interested in general principles, the study of nonhuman learning methods is also necessary for useful results. In terms of applications, some of machine learning's greatest achievements have involved nonincremental methods that are clearly poor models of human learning. Planes are terrible imitations of birds (and fly less efficiently), but there are still excellent reasons for using aircraft.

However, we do believe that too little research has focused on results from the literature on human learning, and that greater attention in this direction would benefit the field as a whole. Science is a complex and bewildering process, and the scientist should employ all available knowledge to direct his steps in useful directions. This strategy seems especially important in young fields like machine learning, in which conflicting views and methods abound. We encourage the reader to join us in applying machine learning techniques to explain the mysteries of human behavior, and in using knowledge of human behavior to constrain our computational theories of learning.

References

  1. Anzai, Y., & Simon, H.A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.Google Scholar
  3. Feigenbaum, E.A. (1963). The simulation of verbal learning behavior. In. E.A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, J.A.C. (1983). A computational model of language acquisition in the two-year-old. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  5. Hunt, E.B., Marin, J., & Stone, P. (1966). Experiments in induction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kolodner, J.L. (1983). Maintaining organization in a dynamic long-term memory. Cognitive Science, 7, 243–280.Google Scholar
  7. Laird, J.E., Rosenbloom, P.S., & Newell, A. (1986). SOAR: The anatomy of a general learning mechanism. Machine Learning, 1, 11–46.Google Scholar
  8. Langley, P. (1982). Language acquisition through error recovery. cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 211–255.Google Scholar
  9. Langley, P. (1985). Learning to search: From weak methods to domain-specific heuristics. Cognitive Science, 9, 217–260.Google Scholar
  10. Lebowitz, M. (1982). Correcting erroneous generalizations. Cognition and Brain Theory, 5, 367–381.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, T.M., Utgoff, P., & Banerji, R.B. (1983). Learning problem solving heuristics by experimentation. In R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell, & T.M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga.Google Scholar
  12. Newell, A. (1967). Studies in problem solving: Subject 3 on the crypt-arithmetic task Donald+Gerald= Robert (Technical Report). Center for the Study of Information Processing, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  13. Ohlsson, S. (1983). A constrained mechanism for procedural learning. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 426–428). Karlsruhe, FRG: Morgan-Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  14. Porter, B.W., & Kibler, D.F. (1986). Experimental goal regression: A method for learning problem solving heuristics. Machine Learning, 1, 249–286.Google Scholar
  15. Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.Google Scholar
  16. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblance studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.Google Scholar
  17. Selfridge, M. (1981). A computer model of child language acquisition. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 92–96). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Morgan-Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  18. Waterman, D.A. (1970). Generalization learning techniques for automating the learning of heuristics. Artificial Intelligence, 1, 121–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pat Langley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvine

Personalised recommendations