Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry

, Volume 14, Issue 1–4, pp 61–71 | Cite as

In-cloud scavenging of gases and aerosols at a mountain site in Central Switzerland

  • B. Oberholzer
  • J. L. CollettJr.
  • J. Staehelin
  • A. Waldvogel
Article
First Online:

Abstract

An in-cloud scavenging case study of the major ions (NH4 +, SO4 2- and NO3 -) determining the cloudwater composition at a mountain site (1620 m.a.s.l.) is presented. A comparison between in-cloud measurements of the cloudwater composition, liquid water content, gas concentrations and aerosol concentrations and pre-cloud gas and aerosol concentrations yields the following results. Cloudwater concentrations resulted from scavenging of about half of the available NH3, aerosol NH4 +, aerosol NO3 -, and aerosol SO4 2-. Approximately a third of the SO2 was scavenged by the cloudwater and oxidized to SO4 2-. Cloud acidity during the first two hours of cloud interception (pH 3.24) was determined mostly by the scavenged gases (NH3, SO2, and HNO3); aerosol contributions to the acidity were found to be small. Observations of gas and aerosol concentrations at three elevations prior to several winter precipitation events indicated that NH3 concentrations are typically half (12–80 %) of the total (gas and aerosol) N (-III) concentrations. HNO3 typically is present at much lower concentrations (1–55 %) than aerosol NO3 -. Concentrations of SO2 are a substantial component of total sulfur, with concentrations averaging 60 % (14–76 %) of the total S (IV and VI).

Keywords

In-cloud scavenging gas scavenging aerosol scavenging cloudwater annular denuder NH3 HNO3 SO2 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anlauf K. G., Mac Tavish D. C., Wiebe H. A., Schiff H. I., and G. I. Mackay (1988) ‘Measurements of atmospheric nitric acid by the filter method and comparisons with the tuneable diode laser and other methods,’ Atmos. Environ., 22, 1579–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinkten H. M., Schwartz S. E., and Daum P. H. (1987) ‘Efficient scavenging of aerosol sulfate by liquid-water clouds,’ Atmosph. Environ., 21, 2035–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collett J. L.Jr., Daube B. C.Jr., and Hoffmann M. R. (1990) ‘The chemical composition of intercepted cloudwater in the Sierra Nevada,’ Atmos. Environ., 24A, 959–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collett J. L.Jr., Prévot A. S. H., Stachelin J. and Waldvogel A (1991) ‘Physical factors influencing winter precipitation chemistry,’ Environ. Sci. Techn., 25, 782–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferm M., (1979) ‘Method for determination of atmospheric ammonia,’ Atmosph. Environ., 13, 1385–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerber H., (1989) ‘Measurement of suspended particulate volume and far-infrared extinction coefficient with a new laser-diffraction instrument,’ J. Aerosol Sci., 20, 1533–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haltiner G. J., Martin F. L. (1957) Dynamical and Physical Meteorology, McGraw Hill, New York, pp 33–35.Google Scholar
  8. Lewin E. E., De Pena R. G., and Shimshock J. P. ‘Atmospheric gas and particle measurements at a rural northeastern U.S. site’, Atmosph. Environ., 20, 59–70.Google Scholar
  9. Liljequist G. H. (1974) Allgemeine Meteorologie, Vieweg+Sohn, Braunschweig, pp 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Niessner R., Malejezyk M., Schilling M., and Klockow D., (1987) ‘Die Diffusion als Probenahmeprinzip zur Gas/partikel-Trennung’, VDI-Berichte, 608, 153–180.Google Scholar
  11. Rosenberg C., Winiwarter W., Gregori M., Pech G., Casensky V., and H. Puxbaum (1988) ‘Determination of inorganic volatile acids, NH3, particulate SO4 2-, NO3 - and Cl- in ambient air with an annular diffusion denuder system’, Analytische Chemie.Google Scholar
  12. Schumann T., Zinder B., and A. Waldvogel (1988) ‘Aerosol and hydrometeor concentrations and their chemical composition during winter precipitation along a mountain slope-1. Temporal evolution of the aerosol, microphysical and meteorological conditions’, Atmos, Environ., 22, 1443–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schumann T. (1990) ‘On the use of a modified clean room optical particle counter for atmospheric aerosols at high relative humidity’, Atmos. Res., 25, 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schumann T. (1991) ‘Aerosol and hydrometeor concentrations and their chemical composition during winter precipitation along a mountain slope—III. Size-differentiated in-cloud scavenging efficiencies’, Atmos. Environ., 25A, 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Slanina J., v. Lamoen-Doomenbal L., Lingerak W. A., and Meilof W., (1981) ‘Application of a thermo-denuder analyzer to the determination of H2SO4, HNO3 and NH3 in air’, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 9, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Valente R. J., Mallant R. K. A. M., McLaren S. E., Schemenauer R. S., Stogner R. E. (1989) ‘Field intercomparison of ground-based cloud physics instruments at Whitetop Mountain, Virginia’, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 6, 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weast R. C. (1984) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64-th edition, Chemical Rubber Company, Ohio.Google Scholar
  18. Zinder B., Schumann T., and A. Waldvogel, (1988) ‘Aerosol and hydrometeor concentrations and their chemical composition during winter precipitation along a mountain slope-II. Enhancement of below cloud scavenging in a stably stratified atmosphere’, Atmos. Environ., 22, 2741–2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Oberholzer
    • 1
  • J. L. CollettJr.
    • 1
  • J. Staehelin
    • 1
  • A. Waldvogel
    • 1
  1. 1.Atmospheric PhysicsETH HönggerbergZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations