Advertisement

Vegetatio

, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Ecological gradients of boreal forests in South Finland: an ordination test of Cajander's forest site type theory

  • Tapani Lahti
  • Risto A. Väisänen
Article

Abstract

Ecological gradients in the field layer of southern boreal forests in South Finland were studied in relation to the dominant tree species and the age of forest stands. The data are from a systematic sample of 529 plots from an area of 150 × 200 km, collected in the Third National Forest Inventory in 1951–53. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was applied to log-transformed species cover values. It revealed three main gradients: fertility, moisture, and the effect of cattle grazing in forests (still extensive in the early 1950's). The fertility gradient dominated the first axis and the two latter sources of variation confounded with it in a complex manner in the first two axes of DCA. The second DCA axis was associated with canopy effects on understory pattern, with Pinus and Picea having opposite and Betula intermediate effects.

These results were compared with an ordination model of Cajander's forest site types, based on DCA of independent, ideal data of 107 indicator species. The fertility gradient recovered by the model was almost identical to that obtained from the field data. The gradient was also stable from intermediate-age (40–69 yrold) to older forests. The forest site types showed rather large overlaps with main neighbouring types in composition of ground vegetation or nutrient status of the humus. Competitively efficient feather-mosses, which are dependent on nutrients released from the tree crowns, are considered important regulators of the understory vegetation. Accordingly, alternative approaches to the forest site type classification to be used in boreal forests treated by modern intensive forestry should give more weight to the effect of the canopy trees.

Keywords

Boreal forest region Canopy-understory interaction Climax Correspondence analysis Forest site type Grazing Nutrient Ordination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaltonen, V. T., 1925. Über den Aziditätsgrad (pH) des Waldbodens. Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 9(6): 1–54.Google Scholar
  2. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. & Jalas, J., 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169–211.Google Scholar
  3. Atlas of Finland, 1960. The Geographical Society of Finland. Otava, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  4. Beals, E. W., 1984. Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv. Ecol. Res. 14: 1–55.Google Scholar
  5. Bergeron, Y. & Bouchard, A., 1983. Use of ecological groups in analysis and classification of plant communities in a section of western Quebec. Vegetatio 56: 45–63.Google Scholar
  6. Cajander, A. K., 1909. Ueber Waldtypen. Acta Forest. Fenn. 1: 1–175.Google Scholar
  7. Cajander, A. K., 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta Forest. Fenn. 29(3): 1–108.Google Scholar
  8. Carleton, T. J. & Maycock, P. F., 1980. Vegetation of the boreal forests south of James Bay: non-centered component analysis of the vascular flora. Ecology 61: 1199–1212.Google Scholar
  9. Frey, T. E. A., 1973. The Finnish school and forest site-types. In: R. H. Whittaker (ed.), Ordination and classification of communities, pp. 405–433. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  10. Gauch, H. G., 1973. The relationship between sample similarity and ecological distance. Ecology 54: 618–622.Google Scholar
  11. Gauch, H. G., 1982a. Noise reduction by eigenvector ordinations. Ecology 63: 1643–1649.Google Scholar
  12. Gauch, H. G., 1982b. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Grandtner, M. M. & Vaucamps, F., 1982. Vegetation science and forestry in Canada. In: G. Jahn (ed.), Handb. Vegetat. Sci. 12: 15–45, Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, M. O., 1979. DECORANA. A Fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.Google Scholar
  16. Hustich, I., 1960 (ed.). Forest types and forest ecosystems. Silva Fenn. 105: 1–142.Google Scholar
  17. Ilvessalo, Y., 1951. III valtakunnan metsien inventointi. Suunnitelma ja maastotyön ohjeet. (Summary: Third national forest survey of Finland. Plan and instructions for field work). Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 39(3): 1–67.Google Scholar
  18. Ilvessalo, Y., 1956. Suomen metsät vuosista 1921–24 vuosiin 1951–53. Kolmeen valtakunnan metsien inventointiin perustuva tutkimus. (Summary: The forests of Finland from 1921–24 to 1951–53. A survey based on three national forest inventories). Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 47(1): 1–227.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, E. A., 1981. Vegetation organization and dynamics of lichen woodland communities in the northwest territories, Canada. Ecology 62: 200–215.Google Scholar
  20. Kalela, A., 1960. Classification of the vegetation, especially of the forests, with particular reference to regional problems. Silva Fenn. 105: 40–49.Google Scholar
  21. Kielland-Lund, J., 1982. Forest types and their application in forestry in Norway. In: G. Jahn (ed.), Handb. Vegetat. Sci. 12: 377–386, Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  22. Kujala, V., 1979. Suomen metsätyypit. (Summary: Forest types of Finald). Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 92(8): 1–45.Google Scholar
  23. Kuusipalo, J., 1983. Distribution of vegetation on mesic forest sites in relation to some characteristics of the tree stand and soil fertility. Silva Fenn. 17: 403–418.Google Scholar
  24. Lampimäki, T., 1939. Nautakarjan laiduntamisesta metsämailla. (Ref.: Über den Waldweidegang des Rindviehs). Silva Fenn. 50: 1–106.Google Scholar
  25. Linkola, K., 1916. Studien über den Einfluss der Kultur auf die Flora in den Gegenden nördlich vom Ladogasee. I. Allgemeiner Teil. Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 45(1): 1–429.Google Scholar
  26. Mikola, P., 1982. Application of vegetation science to forestry in Finland. In: G. Jahn (ed.), Handb. Vegetat. Sci. 12: 199–224. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  27. Oksanen, J., 1983a. Ordination of boreal heath-like vegetation with principal component analysis, correspondence analysis and multidimensional scaling. Vegetatio 52: 181–189.Google Scholar
  28. Oksanen, J., 1983b. Vegetation of forested inland dunes in North Karelia, eastern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 20: 281–295.Google Scholar
  29. Oksanen, J. & Ahti, T., 1982. Lichen-rich pine forest vegetation in Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 19: 275–301.Google Scholar
  30. Sarvas, R., 1951. Tutkimuksia puolukkatyypin kuusikoista. (Summary: Investigations onto the spruce stands of Vaccinium type). Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 39(1): 1–82.Google Scholar
  31. Sepponen, P., 1985. The ecological classification of sorted forest soils of varying genesis in northern Finland. Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 129: 1–77.Google Scholar
  32. Sirén, G., 1955. The development of spruce forest on raw humus sites in northern Finland and its ecology. Acta Forest Fenn. 62(4): 1–408.Google Scholar
  33. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J., 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  34. Tamm, C. O., 1953. Growth, yield and nutrition in carpets of a forest moss (Hylocomium splendens). Meddel. fran Statens Skogsforskningsinst. 43(1): 1–140.Google Scholar
  35. Tamm, C. O., 1964. Growth of Hylocomium splendens in relation to tree canopy. Bryologist 67: 423–426.Google Scholar
  36. Valmari, J., 1921. Beiträge zur chemischen Bodenanalyse. Acta Forest. Fenn. 20(4): 1–67.Google Scholar
  37. Van der Maarel, E., 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114.Google Scholar
  38. Vuokila, Y., 1956. Etelä-Suomen hoidettujen kuusikoiden kehityksestä. (Summary: On the development of managed spruce stands in southern Finland). Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 48(11): 1–138.Google Scholar
  39. Whittaker, R. H., 1962. Classification of natural communities. Bot. Rev. 28: 1–239.Google Scholar
  40. Whittaker, R. H., 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207–264.Google Scholar
  41. Williamson, M. H., 1983. The land-bird community of Skokholm: ordination and turnover. Oikos 41: 378–384.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tapani Lahti
    • 1
  • Risto A. Väisänen
    • 2
  1. 1.Botanical MuseumUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Zoological MuseumUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations