Public Choice

, Volume 89, Issue 1–2, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Public sector unions and public spending

  • Michael L. Marlow
  • William Orzechowski


This study examines the influence of public sector unions on the expansion of the public sector. Based on public goods theory, our paper models how unions influence the supply of and demand for public sector activities. On the demand side, public sector unions are special interests which advocate public sector expansion to policy makers; on the supply side, they exert pressure to maintain and expand monopoly powers. Empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that a positive relationship exists between public sector unionism and public spending.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashenfelter, O. (1971). The effect of unionization on wages in the public sector. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 24: 191–202.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, C. (1991). On strikers and their replacement. Government Union Review 12: 1–29.Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review 57: 415–426.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J.T. and Orzechowski, W. (1983). The voting behavior of bureaucrats: Some empirical evidence. Public Choice 41: 271–283.Google Scholar
  5. Bergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280–296.Google Scholar
  6. Borcherding, T.E. and Deacon, R.T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review 62: 891–901.Google Scholar
  7. Borcherding, T.E., Bush, W.C. and Spann, R.M. (1977). The effects of public spending on the divisibility of public outputs in consumption, bureaucratic power, and the size of the tax-sharing group. In T.E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brunelli, S.A. and Cox, W. (1992). America's protected class: Why excess public employee compensation is bankrupting the States. The State Factor, 1–31. Washington, DC: American Legislative Exchange Council, February.Google Scholar
  10. Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1977). The expanding public sector: Wagner squared. Public Choice 32: 147–150.Google Scholar
  11. Bush, W.C. and Denzau, A.T. (1977). The voting behavior of bureaucrats and public sector growth. In T.E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. California Commission on Campaign Financing. (1985). The new gold rush: California's legislative campaigns. Los Angeles: Center of Responsive Government.Google Scholar
  13. Curme, M.A., Hirsch, B.T. and MacPherson, D.A. (1990). Union membership and contract coverage in the United States, 1983–1988. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44: 5–33.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrenberg, R.D. (1973). Municipal government structure, unionization, and the wages of fire fighters. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27 (October): 36–48.Google Scholar
  15. Gallagher, D.G. (1978). Teacher bargaining and school district expenditures: Industrial Relations 17: 216–239.Google Scholar
  16. Gramlich, E.M. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1982). Voting on public spending: Differences between public employees, transfer receipts, and private workers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1: 516–533.Google Scholar
  17. Ichniowski, C. (1980). Economic effects of the Firefighters' Union. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33: 198–211.Google Scholar
  18. Indiana Chamber of Commerce. (1982). Unionization of government: Tug of war with the public interest. Indianapolis, Indiana. December.Google Scholar
  19. Joulfaian, D. and Marlow, M.L. (1991). Centralization and government competition. Applied Economics 23: 1603–1612.Google Scholar
  20. Logan, R.R. (1986). Fiscal illusion and the grantor government. Journal of Political Economy 96: 1304–1318.Google Scholar
  21. Musgrave, R.A. and Musgrave, P.B. (1988). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  22. Reder, M. (1988). The rise and fall of unions: The public sector and the private. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 89–110.Google Scholar
  23. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Oates, W.E. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review 75: 748–757.Google Scholar
  25. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, various years.Google Scholar
  26. Trejo, S.J. (1991). Public sector unions and municipal employment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45: 166–181.Google Scholar
  27. Troy, L. (1988). Public sector unionism: The rising power center of organized labor. Government Union Review 9: 1–35.Google Scholar
  28. Tullock, G. (1974). Dynamic hypothesis on bureaucracy. Public Choice 19: 127–131.Google Scholar
  29. Winer, S.L. (1983). Some evidence on the effect of the separation of spending and taxing decisions. Journal of Political Economy 91: 126–140.Google Scholar
  30. Zax, J. and Ichniowski, C. (1988). The effects of public sector unionism on pay, employment, department budgets, and municipal expenditures. In R.B. Freeman and C. Ichniowski (Eds.), When public sector workers unionize. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Marlow
    • 1
  • William Orzechowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis Obispo
  2. 2.Alexis de Tocqueville InstitutionArlington

Personalised recommendations