Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 37, Issue 1–2, pp 123–140 | Cite as

A simple theoretical analysis of the low-energy spin fluctuation peak observed by neutrons in liquid 3He

  • M. T. Béal-Monod
Article

We present a simple analysis of the low-energy spin fluctuation peak recently observed at Argonne in neutron experiments performed on liquid 3He at low temperature. From the energy position of the peak, we extract values for the spin-spin interaction (supposed to be of contact type) and the effective mass which agree amazingly well with those used in the paramagnon picture, which assumes liquid 3He to be close to ferromagnetic. This allows a theoretical curve for the incoherent part of the neutron inelastic scattering function to be drawn without any adjustable parameter: the only one that has been extracted from the neutron data. Then, by subtraction from the experimental total scattering function, we obtain an approximate shape for the coherent part containing the zero-sound mode also observed in these experiments. More data, in particular for smaller momentum transfer would be most useful for confirming the above result, and also possibly for building up a one-parameter model for the zero-sound mode, analogous to the one-parameter model (paramagnon) for the spin fluctuation pseudo mode.

Keywords

Momentum Transfer Energy Position Contact Type Spin Fluctuation Small Momentum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. (a)
    K. Sköld, C. A. Pelizzari, R. Kleb, and G. E. Ostrowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 842 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 1. (b)
    K. Sköld and C. A. Pelizzari, J. Phys. C 11, L589 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    W. G. Stirling, in Proc. Int. Conf. Low Temp. Phys. LT15 (Grenoble, 1978), J. Phys. (Paris) 39, C-6, 1334 (dy1978).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    C. H. Aldrich III and D. Pines, J. Low Temp. Phys. 32, 689 (1978), and references therein.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    S. Doniach and S. Engelsberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 750 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    W. Brenig, H. J. Mikeska, and E. Reidel, Z. Physik 206, 439 (1969).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    S. K. Ma, M. T. Béal-Monod, and D. R. Fredkin, Phys. Rev. 174, 227 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    D. Pines and P. Nozières, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Benjamin, dy1966).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    J. C. Wheatley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 415 (1975), p. 467.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    J. C. Wheatley, in Quantum Fluids, D. F. Brown, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966, p. 183.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    M. T. Béal-Monod, S. K. Ma, and D. R. Fredkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 929 (1968); H. Ramm, P. Pedroni, J. R. Thomson, and H. Meyer, J. Low Temp. Phys. 2, 539 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    R. Jullien, M. T. Béal-Monod, and B. Coqblin, Phys. Rev. B 9, 1441 (1974); F. C. Khanna and H. R. Glyde, Can. J. Phys. 54, 648 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    M. T. Béal-Monod and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1461 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    P. A. Hilton, R. A. Cowley, W. G. Stirling, and R. Scherm, Z. Physik B30, 107 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    K. Sköld, post-deadline communication at LT15 (Grenoble, dy1978), unpublished.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    K. Lévin and O. T. Valls, Phys. Rev. B 17, 191 (1978); Simple model for the quasiparticle interactions in 3He, Preprint.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Béal-Monod
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Laue-LangevinGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations