Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 541–549 | Cite as

Preliminary observations on the population development of anystid and free-living mesostigmatic mites in a cereal field in Southern England

  • E. M. El Banhawy
  • N. Carter
  • I. R. Wynne


The effect of manipulating cereal aphid population development, by either adding aphids or spraying with an aphid-specific insecticide, on the predatory mite fauna was investigated. Populations of the anystid mite, Anystis baccarum (L.) were very small until late June when numbers built up rapidly at the time of the aphid population decline. There was however, no significant relationship between aphids and numbers of mites over the whole season. Preliminary electrophoretic analysis of two enzymes in the gut of anystid mites indicated that they may have been feeding on thrips, Limothrips cerealium Haliday. The free-living soil Mesostigmata had two population peaks, each related, the first positively and the second negatively to aphid populations.


Significant Relationship Population Decline Preliminary Observation Electrophoretic Analysis Population Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhattacharyya, S. K. 1962. Laboratory studies on the feeding habits and life cycles of soil-inhabiting mites. Pedobiologia 1: 291–298.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, N. 1989. The role of natural enemies in arable crops. Proceedings of a Symposium, Insect Control and the Environment, pp. 51–69, ICI, Fernhurst.Google Scholar
  3. Easteal, S. and Boussy, I. A. 1987. A sensitive and efficient isoenzyme technique for small arthropods and other invertebrates. Bull. ent Res., 407–415.Google Scholar
  4. El-Badry, E. A. 1972. Observations on the biology of Pergamasus crassipes (L.), a predacious gamasid mite inhabiting forest soil in Bavaria (Acarina: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae). Z. angew. Entomologie, 71: 296–303.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, G. O. and Till, W. M. 1979. Mesostigmatic mites of Britain and Ireland (Chelicerata: Acari-Parasitiformes). An introduction to their external morphology and classification. Trans. Zool. Soc. London, 35: 139–270.Google Scholar
  6. Frazer, B. D., Gilbert, N., Nealis, V. and Raworth, D. A. 1981. Control of aphid density by a complex of predators. Can. Ent., 113: 1035–1041.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, J. R. and Usher, M. B. 1978. Laboratory studies of predation by the grassland mite Pergamasus longicornis Berlese and their possible implications for the dynamics of populations of collembola. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society (A), 6: 143–153.Google Scholar
  8. Hartenstein, R. 1962 Life history studies of Pergamasus crassipes and Amblygamasus septentrionalis (Acarina: Parasitidae). Annals Ent. Soc. Amer., 55: 196–202.Google Scholar
  9. Hassan, S. A., Bigler, F., Blaisinger, P., Bogenschütz, H., Brun, J., Chiverton, P., Dickler, E., Easterbrook, M. A., Edwards, P. J., Englert, W. D., Firth, S. I., Huang, P., Inglesfield, C., Klingauf, F., Kühner, C., Ledieu, M. S., Naton, E., Oomen, P. A., Overmces, W. P. J., Plevcots, P., Reboulet, J. N., Rieckmann, W., Samsoc-Petersen, L., Shires, S. W., Stäubli, A., Stevenson, J., Tuset, J. J., Vanwetswinkel, G. and Van Zon, A. Q. (1985). Standard methods to test the side effects of pesticides on natural enemies of insects and mites developed by the IOBC/WPRS Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’. EPPO Bulletin 15, 214–255.Google Scholar
  10. Holm, E. and Wallace, M. M. H. 1989. Distribution of some anystid mites (Acari: Anystidae) in Australia and Indonesia and their role as possible predators of the cattle tick, Boophilis Microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. appl. Acarol., 6: 77–83.Google Scholar
  11. Karg, W. 1983. Verbreitung und Bedeutung von Raubmilben der cohors Gamasina als Antagonisten von nematoden. Pedobiologia, 25: 419–432.Google Scholar
  12. Loxdale, H. D., Castanera, P. and Brookes, C. P. 1983. Electrophoretic study of enzymes from cereal aphid populations. I. Electrophoretic techniques and staining systems for characterising isoenzymes from six species of cereal aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bull. ent. Res. 73: 645–657.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer, M. K., Smith, P. and Ueckermann, E. A. 1987. A taxonomic study of some Anystidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Entomology Mem. Dep. Agric. Wat. Supply Repub. S. Afr., 68: 37pp.Google Scholar
  14. Mostafa, A. R., De Bach, B. and Fisher, T. W. 1975. Anystid mite: Citrus thrips predator. California Agriculture, 29: 5.Google Scholar
  15. Murray, R. A. and Solomon, M. G. 1978. A rapid technique for analysing diets of invertebrate predators by electrophoresis. Ann. appl. Biol., 90: 7–10.Google Scholar
  16. Oakley J. N., Wratten, S. D., Dixon, A. F. G. and Carter, N. 1988. The Biology and Control of Cereal Aphids. Home Grown Cereal Authority Review.Google Scholar
  17. Richardson, B. J., Banerstock, P. R. and Adams, M. 1986. Allozyme electrophoresis. Academic Press, Sydney, 410 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Ross, G. J. S. 1980. MLP. Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
  19. Solomon, M. G., Murray, R. A. and Vander Geest, L. P. S. 1985. Analysis of prey by means of electrophoresis. Chapter 2. 1. 42 pp 171–173. In W. Helle and M. W. Sabelis (eds), Spider mites, their ecology, natural enemies and control. Vol. 1B El Sevier.Google Scholar
  20. Sorensen, J. T., Kinn, D. N., Doutt, R. L. and Cate, J. R. 1976. Biology of the mite, Anystis agilis (Acarina: Anystidae): A Californian vineyard predator. Annals Ent. Soc. Amer., 69: 905–910.Google Scholar
  21. Sunderland, K. D., Crook, N. E., Stacey, D. L. and Fuller, B. J. 1987. A study of feeding by polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using ELISA and gut dissection. J. Appl. Ecol., 24: 907–933.Google Scholar
  22. Tatchell, G. M., 1989. An estimate of the potential economic losses to some crops due to aphids in Britain. Crop Protection, 8, 25–29.Google Scholar
  23. Thornhill, E. W. 1978. A motorised insect sampler. Plans, 24: 205–207.Google Scholar
  24. Van de Bund, C. F. 1972. Some observations on predatory action of mites on nematodes. Zeszyty Problemouve postepow Nauk Rolniczych, 129: 104–110.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, H. M. H. 1981. Tackling the lucerne flea and red-legged earth mite. J. Agric. W. A. Dept. Agric., 2: 72–74.Google Scholar
  26. Walter, D. E. 1987. Below ground arthropods of semiarid grasslands. Chapter 19, pp. 271–290. In: J. L. Capinera (ed.) Integrated pest management on rangeland: A short grass prairie perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. M. El Banhawy
    • 1
  • N. Carter
    • 1
  • I. R. Wynne
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomology and Nematology Department, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops ResearchRothamsted Experimental StationHarpendenUK

Personalised recommendations