Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 181–193 | Cite as

On-line disciplines: Computer-mediated scholarship in the humanities and social sciences

  • Teresa M. Harrison
  • Timothy Stephen
Article

Abstract

The recent creation of global-area computer networks invites the development of tools and resources that can reap the scholarly advantages of such technology. In this paper, we discuss prospects for the productive use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for scholarly interaction. We begin by describing the technology used to deliver information over academic networks and the kinds of disciplinary services that the technology enables. In the second half of the paper we consider factors that bear upon the development of CMC-based disciplinary centers and we call attention to their potential to create a highly interactive form of scholarship.

Key Words

computer-mediated communication conferencing COMSERVE dialogic texts networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, Patricia, M. and Beatrice Borer. “An Experiment in Computer Conferencing Using a Local Area Network.” The Electronic Library, 5, 3 (1987), 162–69.Google Scholar
  2. Crane, Diane. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Ferguson, John A. PLANET: “A Computer Conferencing System and its Evaluation through a Case Study.” Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9, 2 (1977), 92–95.Google Scholar
  4. Freeman, Linton C. “Q-Analysis and the Structure of Friendship Networks.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12 (1980),367–78.Google Scholar
  5. Gilbert, G. Nigel., & Michael Mulkay. Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Hiltz, Starr Roxanne. “Computer Conferencing: Assessing the Social Impact of a New Communications Medium.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 10 (1977), 223–38.Google Scholar
  7. Hiltz, Starr Roxanne. Online Communities. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Hiltz, Starr Roxanne and Murray Turoff. The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Lerch, Irving A. “Computer Conferencing — A New Tool for Scientific Communication.” Physics Today, 36, 8 (1983), 9, 90.Google Scholar
  10. Licklider, J.C.R. and Robert W. Taylor. “The Computer as a Communication Device.” Science & Technology (1968), 21–31.Google Scholar
  11. McAdams, Alan K., Thomas Victorisz, William L. Dougan and James T. Lombardi. “Economic Benefits and Public Support of a National Education and Research Network.” Educom Bulletin, 23, 2 (1988),63–71.Google Scholar
  12. Markus, M. Lynne. “Toward a ‘Critical Mass’ Theory of Interactive Media.” Communication Research, 14, 5 (1987), 491–511.Google Scholar
  13. Mulkay, Michael. The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. Pfaffenberger, Bryan. “Research Networks, Scientific Communication and the Personal Computer.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC 29, 1 (1986) 30–33.Google Scholar
  15. Quarterman, John S. The Matrix: Computer Networks and Conferencing Systems Worldwide. Digital Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. Schaefermeyer, Mark J. and Edward H. Sewell, Jr. “Communicating by Electronic Mail.” American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 2 (1988), 112–23.Google Scholar
  17. Spelt, Philip F. “Evaluation of a Continuing Computer Conference on Simulation.” Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9 (1977), 87–91.Google Scholar
  18. Thorn, Brian K. and Terry Connolly. “Discretionary Data Bases: Theory and Some Experimental Findings.” Communication Research, 14, 5 (1987) 512–28.Google Scholar
  19. Tombaugh, Jo W. “Evaluation of an International Scientificv Computer-Based Conference.” Journal of Social Issues, 40, 3 (1984),129–44.Google Scholar
  20. Turoff, Murray. “The Future of Computer Conferencing.” The Futurist, 9, 4 (1975), 182–95.Google Scholar
  21. Turoff, Murray. “The Anatomy of a Computer Application Innovation: Computer Mediated Communications (CMC).” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 36 (1989),107–22.Google Scholar
  22. Vallee, Jacques. “Modeling as a Communication Process: Computer Conferencing Offers News Perspectives.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 10 (1977), 391–400.Google Scholar
  23. Vallee, Jacques, Robert Johansen and Kathleen Spangler. “The Computer Conference: An Altered State of Communication.” The Futurist, 9 (1975), 116–21.Google Scholar
  24. Zinn, Karl L. “Computer Facilitation of Communication within Professional Communities.” Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 9, 2 (1977), 96–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa M. Harrison
    • 1
  • Timothy Stephen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Language, Literature & CommunicationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations