Genetica

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 3–13 | Cite as

The process of adaptation of flour beetles to new environments

  • O. Bergerson
  • D. Wool
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Five populations derived from a composite, genetically heterogeneous strain of the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, were selected on new diets (dog food, powdered rice, brewers' yeast, wheat flour and oats) for 13–16 generations. A control population was reared on the standard medium (flour + 5% brewers' yeast). Adaptedness was measured in terms of (1) fitness parameters (survival and developmental time), (2) amylase activity levels (amylase is an essential digestive enzyme in flour beetles) and (3) food preference behavior.

There were significant temporal trends in fitness components in the selected populations. Survival was initially low but increased with time. Developmental time decreased in later generations of selection. The control population showed the smallest increase in survival and no decrease in developmental time. When tested at the end of the experiment, survival to adulthood of eggs from each selected population on its selective diet was higher than that of control eggs. On the standard medium, no differences in survival among populations were detected. These results suggest that the improvement in fitness may indicate adaptation to the new environments created by the different food media.

Amylase activity also increased temporally in 4 selected populations but not in the control (nor on unenriched wheat flour). Tests at the end of the experiment, however, suggest that this increase was, in large part, environmentally induced. We found no evidence that an adaptive genetic change in amylase regulation took place.

There were no temporal trends in food-preference behavior during the selection process.

Keywords

Amylase Digestive Enzyme Temporal Trend Control Population Food Medium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelbaum, S. W. & Konijn, A. M., 1965. The utilization of starch by larvae of the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Nutr. 85: 275–282.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. J., 1969. An evolutionary dilemma: fitness of genotypes versus fitness of populations. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 11: 439–456.Google Scholar
  3. Beranek, A. P., 1974. Esterase variation and organophosphate resistance in populations of Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae. Ent. exp. appl. 17: 129–142.Google Scholar
  4. Bergerson, O., 1985. The process of adaptation of the flour beetle Tribolium to new environments, as a model of an evolutionary process. Ph. D. Thesis, Tel Aviv University (in Hebrew; Engl. summary).Google Scholar
  5. Bergerson, O. & Wool, D., 1986. Genetic variation and the ability to colonize new niches (food media) in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Heredity 57: 403–406.Google Scholar
  6. Bergerson, O. & Wool, D., 1987. Attraction of flour beetles (Tribolium) to wheat flour: hertiable character or ‘conditioning’? Z. angew. Ent. 104: 179–186.Google Scholar
  7. Blackman, R. L., Devonshire, A. L. & Sawicki, R. M., 1977. Coinheritance of increased carboxylesterase activity and resistance to organophosphorous insecticides in Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Pestic. Sci. 8: 163–166.Google Scholar
  8. Bernfeld, P., 1955. Amylases. In: S. P. Colowick & W. O. Kaplan (eds) ‘Methods in Enzymology’. Vol. 1: p. 149. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, A. D., 1971. Plant evolution in extreme environments. In: R., Creed (ed.) ‘Ecological genetics and evolution’. p. 20–50, Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, K. & Clarke, B., 1981. Selection associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster: differential survival of adults maintained on low concentrations of ethanol. Heredity 46: 219–226.Google Scholar
  11. David, J. R., Bocquet, C., Arens, M. F. & Fouillet, P., 1976. Biological role of alcohol dehydrogenase in the tolerance of Drosophila melanogaster to aliphatic alcohols: utilization of an ADH-null mutant. Biochem. Genet. 14: 989–997.Google Scholar
  12. Dawson, P. S., 1965. Estimation of components of phenotypic variance for development rate in Tribolium. Heredity 20: 403–417.Google Scholar
  13. Dawson, P. S., 1967. Developmental rate and competitive ability in Tribolium. II. Changes in competitive ability following further selection for developmental rate. Evolution 21: 292–299.Google Scholar
  14. Dawson, P. S. & Riddle, R. A., 1983. Genetic variation, environmental heterogeneity and evolutionary stability. In: C. E. King & P. S. Dawson (eds), ‘Population Biology: retrospect and prospect.’ p. 147–170, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dethier, V. G., 1954. Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8: 33–54.Google Scholar
  16. Gartside, D. W. & McNeilly, T., 1974. Genetic studies in heavy metal tolerant plants. I. Genetics of zinc tolerance in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Heredity 32: 287–297.Google Scholar
  17. Georghiou, G. P. & Mellon, R. B., 1983. Pesticide resistance in time and space. In: G. P. Georghiou & T. Saito (eds), ‘Pest resistance to pesticides,’ p. 1–46, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Georghiou, G. P. & Pasteur, N., 1978. Electrophoretic esterase patterns in insecticide-resistant and susceptible mosquitoes. J. econ. Entomol. 7: 201–205.Google Scholar
  19. Georghiou, G. P. & Pasteur, N., 1980. Organophosphate resistance and esterase pattern in a natural population of the southern house mosquito from California. J. econ. Entomol. 73: 489–492.Google Scholar
  20. Georghiou, G. P. & Taylor, C. E., 1976. Pesticide resistance as an evolutionary phenomenon. Proc. XVth Int. Cong. Entomology Wash. 759–786.Google Scholar
  21. Hedrick, P. W. & McDonald, J. F., 1980. Regulatory gene adaptation: an evolutionary model. Heredity 45: 83–97.Google Scholar
  22. Kettlewell, H. B. D., 1961. The phenomenon of industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 6: 245–262.Google Scholar
  23. Kettlewell, H. B. D., 1973. The evolution of melanism in the Lepidoptera. Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Krimbas, C. B., 1984. On adaptation, Neo-Darwinian tautology and population fitness. Evol. Biol. 17: 1–57.Google Scholar
  25. Krishna, S. S. & Saxena, K. N., 1962. Digestion and absorption of food in Tribolium castaneum. Physiol. Zool. 35: 66–78.Google Scholar
  26. Lewontin, R. C., 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. In: H. G. Baker & G. I. Stebbins (eds), ‘Genetics of colonizing species.’ p. 77–91.Google Scholar
  27. Liu, E. H., Smith, M. H., Godt, M. J. W., Chesser, R. K., Lethco, A. K. & Henzler, D. J., 1985. Enzyme levels in natural mosquitofish populations. Physiol. Zool. 58: 242–252.Google Scholar
  28. Matsuo, Y. & Yamazaki, T., 1984. Genetic analysis of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster in Japan. IV. Natural selection on the inducibility, but not on the structural genes, of amylase loci. Genetics 108: 879–896.Google Scholar
  29. McDonald, J. F., Chambers, G. K., David, J. & Ayala, F. J., 1977. Adaptive responses due to changes in gene regulation. A study with Drosophila. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74: 4562–4566.Google Scholar
  30. McKenzie, J. A. & Purvis, A., 1974. Chromosomal localization of fitness modifiers of Diazinon resistance genotypes of Lucilia cuprina. Heredity 53: 625–634.Google Scholar
  31. Park, T., Mertz, D. B., Grodzinsky, W. & Prus, T., 1965. Cannibalistic predation in populations of flour beetles. Physiol. Zool. 38: 289–321.Google Scholar
  32. Park, T., Mertz, D. B. & Holecek, H., 1974. Factors affecting the susceptibility of flour beetles pupae to cannibalism by adults. Physiol. Zool. 47: 266–272.Google Scholar
  33. Park, T., Mertz, D. B. & Nathanson, M., 1968. The cannibalism of pupae by adult flour beetles. Physiol. Zool. 41: 228–253.Google Scholar
  34. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J., 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  35. Sokoloff, A. 1974. The biology of Tribolium. Vol. II. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sverdlov, E. & Wool, D., 1975. Some aspects of survival of starved adult Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) J. Stored Prod. Res. 11: 149–154.Google Scholar
  37. Van, Herrewege, J. & David, J. R., 1980. Dietary utilization of aliphatic alcohols by Drosophila. Experientia 36: 846–847.Google Scholar
  38. Wallace, B., 1978. The adaptation of Drosophila virilis to life on an artificial crab. Am. Natur. 112: 971–973.Google Scholar
  39. Wool, D., 1969a. Differences in population parameters of two Tribolium castaneum strains in environments of different shapes. Res. Popul. Ecol. 11: 45–56.Google Scholar
  40. Wool, D., 1969 (b). The effect of larval age range on survival of two Tribolium castaneum strains in mixed cultures through pupae cannibalism. Res. Popul. Ecol. 11: 40–44.Google Scholar
  41. Wool, D., 1976. Changes of life-history stage distribution of single-strain and mixed Tribolium populations during a single generation at a lowered temperature (Coleoptra, Tenebrionidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 381–394.Google Scholar
  42. Wool, D., 1984. Directional and correlated effects of selection on amylase activity, weight and developmental time in Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Genetica 65: 173–178.Google Scholar
  43. Wool, D., 1986. Enzyme activity levels in individuals; selective value, overreaction and conditional neutrality. Evol. Theory 8: 39–48.Google Scholar
  44. Wool, D. & Bergerson, O., 1979. Analysis of selection processes using the incompletely-penetrant mutant eu of Tribolium castaneum. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21: 405–415.Google Scholar
  45. Wool, D., Namir, Z. & Bergerson, O., 1986. Dietary regulation of amylase activity levels in flour beetles (Tribolium: Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 79: 407–413.Google Scholar
  46. Wool, D. & Noiman, S., 1980. Amylase activity in adults and immatures of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Z. angew. Ent. 90: 382–390.Google Scholar
  47. Wool, D. & Shirtz, E., 1984. Selection for high and low amylase activity in adult flour beetles (Tribolium confusum). (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Genetica 63: 229–236.Google Scholar
  48. Wool, D. & Sverdlov, E., 1976. Sib-mating populations in an unpredictable environment: Effects on components of fitness. Evolution 30: 119–129.Google Scholar
  49. Wool, D. & Sverdlov, E., 1978. Temporal patterns of food availability and their effect on Tribolium populations. Res. Popul. Ecol. 20: 91–104.Google Scholar
  50. Wu, L., Bradshaw, A. D. & Thurmann, D. A., 1975. The potential for evolution of heavy metal tolerance in plants. III. The rapid evolution of copper tolerance in Agrostis tenuis. Heredity 34: 165–187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Bergerson
    • 1
  • D. Wool
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsraël

Personalised recommendations