HEC Forum

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 155–162 | Cite as

The ethics of placebos in AIDS drug trials

  • John D. H. Porter
  • Bruce D. Forrest
  • Ann R. Kennedy
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    MMWR. CDC Kaposi sarcoma and pneumocystis pneumonia among homosexual men-New York City and California. July 3, 1981; 30(29):1–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angell MA. A dual approach to the AIDS epidemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 1991;21:1498–1500.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schinazi RF, Nahmias AJ. (eds.) Aids in children, adolescents and heterosexual adults: An interdisciplinaryapproach to prevention. Elsevier Science Publishing Co.; 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    AIDS Bulletin (Number 5) Institute of Actuaries, UK; 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bayer R. Public health policy and the AIDS epidemic: An end to HIV exceptionalism? New England Journal of Medicine. 1991;21:1500–1504.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whalan DJ. The ethics and morality of clinical trials in man. Medical Journal of Australia. 1975;1:491–94.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Getting the AIDS drug parallel-track proposal back on track. ASM News. 1990;56:256–57..Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caplan AL. Ethics and clinical research. Lancet. 1990;336:1261.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winton R. The significance of the Declaration of Helsinki: An interpretative commentary. Medical Journal of Australia. 1978;2:78–79.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koestler A. Act of Creation London, UK: Hutchinson & Co. Publishers; 1964.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 2nd ed. Littleton, MA: PSG Publishing Co.; 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: A practical approach. New York, NY: Wiley; 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biomedical research: A revised code of ethics. (Declaration of Helsinki adopted by the Eighteenth World Medical Assembly) Helsinki; 1964. WHO Chronicle. 1976;30:360–62.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winton R. The significance of the declaration of Helsinki. Medical Journal of Australia. 1978;2:78–79.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health aspects of human rights. WHO Chronicle. 1976;30:347–59.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lim R, Connolly AJ, Elstob JE. Tribulations for clinical trials. British Medical Journal. 1991;302:1271.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herxheimer A. The rights of the patient in clinical research. Lancet. 1988; Nov. 12; 1128–30.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gillon R. Philosophical medical ethics. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1986:62–65.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Applebaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False data and the therapeutic misconception: Two urgent problems in research ethics. Hastings Center Report. 1987;17 (2):16–24.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Helmchen H, Muller-Oerlinghausen B. The inherent paradox of clinical trials in psychiatry. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1975;1:168–73.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Flieger K. How experimental drugs are tested in humans. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1989;8:160–62.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levine C, Dubler NN, Levine RJ. Building a new consensus: Ethical principles and policies for clinical research on HIV/AIDS. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research. 1991;13(1–2):1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. H. Porter
  • Bruce D. Forrest
  • Ann R. Kennedy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations