Genetica

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 217–227 | Cite as

Le caryotype et la spermatogénèse de Mus setulosus (bandes Q, C, G et coloration argentique)

  • M. Jotterand-Bellomo
Article

Abstract

The karyotype and the spermatogenesis of Mus setulosus (G, Q, C bands and Ag-staining). — The G, Q and C banding patterns of Mus setulosus are described. In the male five Ag-NORs were detectable, located at the distal extremities of the chromosomes. The meiotic divisions of Mus setulosus ♂ were studied by silver-staining and C-banding. The X and Y chromosomes remain close to each other during leptotene, zygotene and pachytene; they do not establish and end-to-end or side-by-side association. During diplotene, diakinesis and metaphase I, they most often are separated. At pachytene the bivalents 5 and 7 lie near each other and form a ‘heterochromatic vesicle’. The r-RNA synthesis declines at the end of pachytene and stops during diplotene, diakinesis, metaphase I and II. During these four stages the centromeres are Ag-positive. A comparative analysis of G-bands revealed a great number of analogies between Mus musculus and M. setulosus, which confirms the hypothesis that M. setulosus originated from a Mus of the musculus group. Nevertheless the existence of non-homologous pairs and the differences in the distribution and the size of heterochromatic blocks show that the derivation of the karyotype of setulosus from that of musculus imply several complex rearrangements, the nature of which could not be determined despite the refinement of the actual techniques.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Caspersson, T., Zech, L., Modest, E. J., Foley, G. E., Wagh, U. & Simonsson, E., 1969. Chemical differentiations with fluorescent alkylating agents in Vicia faba metaphase chromosomes. Expl Cell Res. 58: 146–152.Google Scholar
  2. Caspersson, T., Zech, L. & Johansson, C., 1970. Differential binding of alkylating fluorochromes in human chromosomes. Expl Cell Res. 60: 315–319.Google Scholar
  3. Evan, E. P., Breckon, G. & Ford, C. E. 1964. An air-drying method for meiotic preparations from mammalian testes. Cytogenetics 3: 289–294.Google Scholar
  4. Gagné, R. & Laberge, C., 1972. Specific cytological recognition of the heterochromatic segment of number 9 chromosome in man. Expl Cell Res. 73: 239–242.Google Scholar
  5. Gagné, R., Laberge, C. & Tanguay, R., 1973. Aspect cytologique et localisation intranucléaire de l'hétérochromatine constitutive des chromosomes C 9 chez l'homme. Chromosoma 41: 159–166.Google Scholar
  6. Gagné, R., Luciani, J. M., Devictor-Vuillet, M. & Stahl, A., 1974. C 9 heterochromatin during the first meiotic prophase of human fetal ovocyte. Expl Cell Res. 85: 111–116.Google Scholar
  7. Gropp, A., Citoler, P. & Geisler, M., 1969. Karyotypvariation und Heterochromatinmuster bei Igeln (Erinaceus und Hemiechinus). Chromosoma 27: 288–307.Google Scholar
  8. Hofgärtner, F. J., Schmid, M., Krone, W., Zenzes, M. T. & Engel, W., 1979. Pattern of activity of nucleolus organizers during spermatogenesis in mammals as analyzed by silver-staining. Chromosoma 71: 197–216.Google Scholar
  9. Howell, W. M. & Black, D. A., 1978. A rapid technique for producing silver-stained nucleolus organizer regions and trypsin-Giemsa bands in human chromosomes. Hum. Genet. 43: 53–56.Google Scholar
  10. Hsu, T. C. & Kellogg, D. S., 1960. Primary cultivation and continuous propagation in vitro of tissues from small biopsy specimens. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 25: 221–235.Google Scholar
  11. Jotterand, M., 1972. Le polymorphisme chromosomique des Mus (Leggadas) africains. Cytogénétique, zoogéographie et e volution. Rev. suisse Zool. 79: 287–359.Google Scholar
  12. Pathak, S. & Hsu, T.C., 1979. Silver-stained structures in Mammalian meiotic prophase. Chromosoma 70: 195–203.Google Scholar
  13. Pathak, S., Elder, F. F. B. & Maxwell, B. L., 1980. Asynaptic behavior of X and Y chromosomes in the Virginia oppossum and the southern pigmy-mouse. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 26: 142–149.Google Scholar
  14. Salamanca, F. & Armendares, S., 1974. C-bands in human metaphase chromosomes treated by Ba(OH)2. Annls Génét. 17: 135–136.Google Scholar
  15. Seabright, M. 1971. Rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet II, 971.Google Scholar
  16. Solari, H. J. & Ashley, T., 1977. Ultrastructure and behavior of the achiasmatic, telosynaptic XY pair of the sand-rat (Psammomys obesus). Chromosoma 62: 319–336.Google Scholar
  17. Stahl, A., Luciani, J. M., Gagné, R., Devictor, M. & Capodano, A. M., 1974. Heterochromatin, micronucleoli and RNA containing body in the diplotene stage of the human oocyte. Chromosomes Today 5: 65–73.Google Scholar
  18. Zenzes, M. T. & Wolf, U. 1971. Paarungsverhalten der Geschlechtschromosomen in der männlichen Meiose von Microtus agrestis. Chromosoma 33: 41–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Jotterand-Bellomo
    • 1
  1. 1.Division autonome de Génétique MédicaleCHUVLausanneSuisse

Personalised recommendations