Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 242–262 | Cite as

Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal

  • R. L. Pressey
  • I. R. Johnson
  • P. D. Wilson
Papers

In most regions there are many possible ways of combining numbers of sites into reserve systems that represent a range of natural feasures. The ‘irreplaceability’ of a site is operationally defined as the percentage of these alternative systems in which it occurs. This is a fundamental measure of the conservation value of the site in terms of its potential contribution to the achievement of a reservation goal or, alternatively, the options for reservation that are lost if the site is lost. The measure allows decisions to be made on the future of individual sites in the context of their value, in combination with other sites, to the conservation of the full range of natural features in a region. It also provides a logical framework for the design of whole systems of reserves, with decisions proceeding from the most to the least irreplaceable. Irreplaceability can be measured directly for small data sets but must be predicted for regional data sets. A promising approach to prediction is discussed that requires validation with more extensive trials. The irreplaceability of a site depends on a specific reservation target and changes as some of the site's features become progressively represented in reserves elsewhere. The concept of irreplaceability undermines notions of conservation value that are static or based on a single static system of sites to achieve a reservation goal.

Keywords

reserve selection conservation value conservation options 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, M.P. and Margules, C.R. (1986) Assessing representativeness. In Wildlife conservation evaluation (M.B. Usher, ed.) pp. 46–67. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Scores and score classes for evaluation criteria: a comparison based on the cost of reserving all natural features. Biol. Conserv. 56, 281–94.Google Scholar
  3. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Keith, D.A. (1992) A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conserv. 62, 115–25.Google Scholar
  4. Cocks, K.D. and Baird, I.A. (1989) Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biol. Conserv. 49, 113–30.Google Scholar
  5. Franklin, J.F. (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes? Ecol. Appl. 3, 202–5.Google Scholar
  6. Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127–34.Google Scholar
  7. Kirkpatrick, J.B. and Harwood, C.E. (1983) Conservation of Tasmanian macrophytic wetland vegetation. Proc. R. Soc. Tas. 117, 5–20.Google Scholar
  8. Leader-Williams, N., Harrison, J. and Green, M.J.B. (1990) Designing protected areas to conserve natural resources. Sci. Progress 74, 189–204.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, A., Stein, J.L., Stein, J.A., Nix, H.A., Mackey, B.G. and Bowyer, J.K. (1991) An assessment of regional conservation adequacy: Tasmania. Resource Assessment Commission Forest and Timber Inquiry Consultancy Series Number FTC91/17.Google Scholar
  10. Mabbutt, J.A. (1968) Review of concepts of land classification. In Land evaluation (G.A. Stewart, ed.) pp. 11–28. Melbourne: MacMilian.Google Scholar
  11. Margules, C.R. (1989) Selecting nature reserves in the South Australian mallee. In Mediterranean landscapes in Australia: Mallee ecosystems and their management (J.C. Noble and R.A. Bradstock, ed) pp. 398–405. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  12. Margules, C.R. and Nicholls, A.O. (1987) Assessing the conservation value of remnant ‘islands’: mallee patches on the western Eyre Feninsula, South Australia. In Nature conservation: The role of remnants of native vegetation (D.A. Saunders, G.W. Arnold, A.A. Burbidge and A.J.M. Hopkins, eds) pp. 89–102. Sydney: Surrey Beatty.Google Scholar
  13. Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 663–76.Google Scholar
  14. Margules, C.R. and Usher, M.B. (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv. 24, 115–28.Google Scholar
  15. McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A. and Werner, T.B. (1990) Conserving the world's biological diversity. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, G. and Terrey, J. (1990) Natural regions of western New South Wales and their use for environmental management. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16, 467–73.Google Scholar
  17. Morgan, G. and Terrey, J. (1992) Nature conservation in western New South Wales. Sydney: National Parks Association of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  18. Morton, S.R. (1990) The impact of European settlement on the vertebrate animals of arid Australia: a conceptual model. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16, 201–13.Google Scholar
  19. Mwalyosi, R.B.B. (1991) Ecological evaluation for wildlife corridors and buffer zones for Lake Manyara National Park, Tanzania, and its immediate environment. Biol. Conserv. 57, 171–86.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv. 64, 165–9.Google Scholar
  21. Nix, H.A. (1976) Environmental control of breeding, post-breeding dispersal and migration of birds in the Australian region. In Proceedings of the 16th Ornithological Congress, Canberra 1974 (H.J. Frith and J.H. Calaby, eds) pp. 272–305. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  22. Noss, R.F. (1987) From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biol. Conserv. 41, 11–37.Google Scholar
  23. Pressey, R.L. (1990) Reserve selection in New South Wales: where to from here? Aust. Zool. 26, 70–5.Google Scholar
  24. Pressey, R.L., Bedward, M. and Nicholls, A.O. (1990) Reserve selection in mallee lands. In The mallee lands: A conservation perspective (J.C. Noble, P.J. Joss and G.K. Jones, eds) pp. 167–78. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  25. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989a) Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50, 263–78.Google Scholar
  26. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989b) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring vs. ierative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199–218.Google Scholar
  27. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Reserve selection in the Western Division of New South Wales: development of a new procedure based on land system mapping. In Nature conservation: Cost effective biological surveys and data analysis (C.R. Margules and M.P. Austin, eds) pp. 98–105. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  28. Purdie, R.W., Blick, R. and Bolton, M.P. (1986) Selection of a conservation reserve network in the Mulga Biogeographic Region of south-western Queensland, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 38, 369–84.Google Scholar
  29. Rebelo, A.G. and Siegfried, W.R. (1990) Protection of Fynbos vegetation: ideal and real world options. Biol. Conserv. 54, 15–31.Google Scholar
  30. Rebelo, A.G. and Siegfried, W.R. (1992) Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa?—models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximising the protection of floral diversity. Conserv. Biol. 6, 243–52.Google Scholar
  31. Reed, P. (1990) An historical perspective on: Conserving What?-the basis for nature conservation reserves in New South Wales 1967–1989. Aust. Zool. 26, 85–91.Google Scholar
  32. Rojas, M. (1992) The species problem and conservation: what are we protecting? Conserv. Biol. 6, 170–8.Google Scholar
  33. Runte, A. (1979) National Parks the American Experience. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ryti, R.T. (1992) The effect of the focal taxon on the selection of nature reserves. Ecol. Appl. 2, 404–10.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, P.G.R. and Theberge, J.F. (1986) A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas. Environ. Manage. 10, 715–34.Google Scholar
  36. Soule, M.E. (1991) Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. Science 253, 744–50.Google Scholar
  37. Terborgh, J. (1992) Maintenance of diversity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24, 283–92.Google Scholar
  38. Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?—systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–54.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, P.J. (1991) Land systems ot western New South Wales. Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales Technical Report No. 25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Pressey
    • 1
  • I. R. Johnson
    • 1
  • P. D. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife ServiceHurstvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations