Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 381–386 | Cite as

The influence of coppiced teak (Tectona grandis L.F.) regrowth and roots on intercropped maize (Zea mays L.)

  • I. Verinumbe
  • D. U. U. Okali
Article

Abstract

Trenching and shoot removal showed the relative influences of living roots and the canopy cast by teak (Tectona grandis L.F.) coppice regrowth on the growth and yield of interplanted maize (Zea mays L.). Teak and maize were planted at 1.8 × 1.8 m and 0.3 × 1.8 m spacing respectively.

Competition for light started about four weeks after planting and caused etiolated height growth of maize. When combined with root competition it caused stunted growth. Shading also substantially reduced total dry matter production, grain yield, number of cobs per plant, average cob weight, and weight of grains per cob of maize (P<0.01). Living teak roots alone did not have a significant effect (P>0.05) on maize height growth, total dry matter production, grain yield, number of cobs per plant,average cob weight and weight of grains per cob. However, combined with shading, living roots of teak appreciably reduced total dry matter yield and average cob weight of maize (P<0.01).

Keywords

Height Growth Relative Influence Living Root Root Competition Shoot Removal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adebagbo CA (1975) Root mass layering in a teak (Tectona grandis Linn.F.) plantation in relation to soil depth. Special study Report, Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Mimeo. 46 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1979) Annual Report, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  3. Cochran WG and Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs. John Wiley and Sons LtdGoogle Scholar
  4. Guinard A (1967) Conservation and improvement of soil fertility in Africa. World Crops 19(6):29–31Google Scholar
  5. King KFS (1968) Agri-silviculture (The Taungya system), Ibadan University Press, Ibadan, 109 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. King KFS (1979) Concepts of agroforestry. In: T Chandler and D Spurgeon (eds) International cooperation in agroforestry, ICRAF and DSE, Nairobi, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  7. Okali DUU and Nwoboshi LC (1979) A preliminary study of the performance of maize planted among coppiced teak (unpublished manuscript), Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Poulsen G (1978) Man and the tree in tropical Africa. Publication 101, IDRC, Ottawa. 31 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Ruthenberg H (1976) Farming systems in the tropics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 366 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Torres F (1983) Role of woody perennials in animal agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 1:131–163Google Scholar
  11. Verinumbe I and Okali DUU (1985) Coppiced teak regrowth has little effect on soil in a teak-maize agroforest. Forest Ecology and Management (in press)Google Scholar
  12. vine H (1968) Development in the study of soils and shifting agriculture intropical Africa. In: RP Moss (ed) The soil resources of tropical Africa. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Verinumbe
    • 1
  • D. U. U. Okali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of IbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations