Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Anatomy of a new medium: Literary and pedagogic uses of advanced linguistic computer structures

  • Janet H. Murray
Article

Abstract

The availability of advanced function workstations makes possible a new medium for the manipulation of language which changes in kind as well as in degree the pedagogic and literary potential of the computer. This article presents a structural/functional analysis of the kind of system that, though still unrealized, is becominig increasingly possible to build: an Advanced Language System that includes natural language processing, knowledge representation, discourse structure, and narrative structure. Communicative language learning and the creation of computer-based fiction are both served by the emergence of this medium. Advanced language systems may include: “ako” links, semantic networks, query, “script,” “analogy,” and character/belief structures. For language learning advanced language systems offer greater error correction and research opportunities and more flexibility in presenting communicative and cultural exercises. For the creation of art, they offer the possibility of creating “round” instead of “flat” characters and “dynamic” rather than static plots. Programs which “learn” offer the possibility of creating literary formulae and even interpretive “traditions” on the computer. Literary invention will always be the key to making such systems effective as art or as aids to communicative learning.

Key Words

Advanced Language System natural language processing knowledge representation discourse structure narrative structure computer-based fiction communicative language learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Been, M. P., and C. N. Candlin. “The Essentials of a Communicative Curriculum in Language Teaching.” Applied Linguistics (1980), 90-112.Google Scholar
  2. Boden, Margaret. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Bolter, Jay David, and Joyce, Michael. “Hypertext and Creative Writing.” Hypertext `87 Talks, Chapel Hill, N.C. 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Brady, Michael and Robert C. Berwick, eds. Computational Models of Discourse. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, P. Michael. “Interactive Fiction and Narrative Theory: Towards and Anti-Theory.” New England Review and Brad Loaf Quarterly, 10, 1 (1987), 76–84.Google Scholar
  6. Colby, K. M. Artifical Paranoia. New York: Pergamon, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Colby, K. M., and J. P. Gilberte. “Programming a Computer Model of Neurosis.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1 (1964), 405–17.Google Scholar
  8. Feureman, Ken, Catherine Marshall, David Newman, and Marikka Rypa. “The CALLE Project” CALICO Journal, 4, 3 (1987), 25–34.Google Scholar
  9. Finin, T. Goodman, and H. Tennat. “JETS: Achieving Completeness through Coverage and Closure.” In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. London, 1971, pp. 275–81.Google Scholar
  10. Furstenberg, Gilberte. “Quand une pédagogie rencontre une technologie...;” Le Francais dans le Modee, August–September 1988, 158–66.Google Scholar
  11. Grosz, Barbara, J., Karen Sparck Jones, and Bonnie Lynn Webber, eds. Readings in Natural Language Processing. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, L. “User-oriented Data Base Queries with the Robot Natural Language Query System.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9 (1977), 697–713.Google Scholar
  13. Hendrix, G. Sacerdoti, E. Sagalowicz, and J. Slocum. “Developing a Natural Language Interface to Complex Data.” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 3, 2 (1978), 105–47.Google Scholar
  14. Hodges, Matthew, Russell Sasnet, and Mark Ackerman. “A Construction Set for Multi-Media Applications.” IEEE Software, 6, 1 (1989), 37–43.Google Scholar
  15. Karmsch, Claire, Douglas Morgenstern, and Janet H. Murray. “Designing Materials for the Language Lab of the Future: An Overview of the MIT Athena Language Learning Project.” CALICO Journal, 2, 4 (1985), 31–34.Google Scholar
  16. Kramsch, Claire. Discourse Analysis and Second Language Teaching. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. Kramsch, Claire. “Interactive Discourse in Small and Large Groups.” In Interactive Language Teaching. Ed. Wilga M. Rivers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
  18. Lehnert, Wendy G., and Martin H. Ringle, eds. Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. Morgenstern, Douglas. “Simulation, Interactive Fiction and Language Learning: Aspects of the MIT Project.” Bulletin de l ACLA/Bulletin of the CARL (Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics), 8, 2 (1986), 23–33.Google Scholar
  20. Morgenstern, Douglas. “The Athena Language Learning Project.” Hispania, 69 (1986), 740–45.Google Scholar
  21. Morgenstern, Douglas. “Artifice versus Real-world Date: Six Simulations for Spanish Learners.” In Simulation-Gaming in the late 1980's: Proceedings of the International Simulation and Gaming Association's 17th International Conference. Ed. D. Crookall, et. al. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987, pp. 101–109.Google Scholar
  22. Moulthrop, Stuart. “Containing Multitudes: The Problem of Closure in Interactive Fiction.” Paper presented at Modern Languages Association Convention, San Francisco, December 28, 1987.Google Scholar
  23. Murray, Janet H. “Humanists in an Institute of Technology: How Foreign Languages Are Reshaping Workstation Computing at MIT.” Academic Computing, 2, 1 (1987), 34–35, 62–64.Google Scholar
  24. Murray, Janet H., Gilberte Furstenberg, and Douglas Morgenstern. “The Athena Language Learning Project: Design Issues for the Next Generation of Computer-Based Language Learning Tools.” In Modern Technology in Foreign Language Education. Ed. William Flint Smith. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company, 1989, pp. 97–118.Google Scholar
  25. Niesz, Anthony J., and Norman N. Holland. “Interactive Fiction.” Critical Inquiry, 11 (1984), 110–29.Google Scholar
  26. Papert, Seymour. Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Pinsky, Robert. “A Brief Description of Mindwheel.” New England Review and Bread Loaf Quarterly, 10, 1 (1987), 64–67.Google Scholar
  28. Pinsky, Robert, and P. Michael Campbell. “Mindwheel: A Game Session.” New England Review and Bread Load Quarterly, 10, 1 (1987), 70–75.Google Scholar
  29. Plath, W. “REQUEST: A Natural Language Question-answering System.” IBM Journal of Research and Development, (1976), 326–35.Google Scholar
  30. Propp, Vladimir. Morphology of the Folktale. Trans. Laurence Scott. Austin: University of Texas, 1986.Google Scholar
  31. Reichman, Rachel. Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, Stephen D., and Lisa C. Braden-Harder. “The Experience of Developing a Large-Scale Natural Language Text Processing System: Critique.” In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Austin: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988.Google Scholar
  33. Savignon, Sandra J. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1983.Google Scholar
  34. Schank, Roger C. Reading and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar
  35. Schank, Roger C., and R. P. Ableson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understandings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. Schank, Roger C., and Christopher K. Riesbeck. Inside Computer Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  37. Slocum, Jonathan. “Morphological Processing in the NABU System.” Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language. Processing Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988, 228–34.Google Scholar
  38. Turkle, Sherry. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  40. Waltz, D. “An English Language Question-answering System for a Large Relational Database.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 21 (1978), 526–39.Google Scholar
  41. Weizenbaum, Joseph. “ELIZA — A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9 (1966), 36–45.Google Scholar
  42. Weizenbaum, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar
  43. Widdowson, H. G. Teaching Language as Communication. London: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  44. Winston, Patrick Henry. Artificial Intelligence. 2nd ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet H. Murray
    • 1
  1. 1.Senior Research Scientist, Department of HumanitiesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge

Personalised recommendations