Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 83–94 | Cite as

Benefit-cost analysis of selected agroforestry systems in Northeastern Thailand

  • S. Wannawong
  • G. H. Belt
  • C. W. McKetta


Potential productivity and financial returns from selected agroforestry systems and traditional monocrops located in the Phu Wiang watershed were estimated from limited trials of cropping alternatives using cost-benefit analysis. The agroforestry systems studied consisted of combinations of Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis), Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala), or Acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) inter-cropped with cassava (Manihot esculenta) or mungbean (Vigna radiata). Evidence from trials at short, 3-year rotations, demonstrate that early supplementary and complementary relationships between some system components can imply synergistic financial gains. Although these biological interactions turn competitive over time, in this case, the gains should be sufficient to make early adopters consider the agroforestry systems financially preferable to traditional monocrops.

Key words

agroforestry benefit-cost analysis competition Thailand 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arnold JEM (1983) Economic consideration in agroforestry projects. Agroforestry Systems 1: 299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cailliez F (1980) Forest Volume Estimation and Yield Prediction: Volume 1-Volume Estimation. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etherington DM and Matthews PJ (1985) MULBUD User's Manual: A Computer Package for the Economic Analysis of the Multi-Period and Multi-Enterprise Farm Budgets. Australia, 96 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filius AM (1982) Economic aspects of agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 1: 29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoekstra DA (1987) Economics of Agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 5: 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoekstra DA (1985a) The Use of Economics in Diagnosis and Design of Agroforestry Systems. Working Paper NO. 29. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya, 85 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanazawa Y, Sato and Orsolino RS (1982) Above-ground biomass and growth of giant ipilipil (Leucaena, leucephala) plantations in northern Mindanao Island, Philippines. JARQ 15(3): pp 209–217Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Academy of Sciences (1980) Firewood Crops: Shrub and Tree Species for Energy Production. Washington, DC, 237 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petmak P (1987) Volume Table of Eucalyptus camaldulensis plantation, 2 to 8 years of age. Varasarn-Vamasart 6: 399–413Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Randall Allen (1987) Resource Economics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 434 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raintree JB (1983) Bioeconomic considerations in the design of agroforestry cropping systems. In: Huxley PA, ed, Plant Research and Agroforestry. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 271–286Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sterk A and Ginneken PV (1987) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Reforestation: An Approach for Phu Wiang, Khon Kaen, Northeastern Thailand. Project NO. FO: DP/THA/84/002. Kohon Kaen, Thailand, 106 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wacharakitti S, Eddkao K, Raungpanit N, Kutintara U and Pttanatuma A (1979) Nam Pong environment management research study — studies on land use and plant canopies (Thailand). In: Carpenter Richard A, ed, Assessing Tropical Forest Lands: Their Suitability for Sustaninable Uses. Dublin, pp 315–328Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wong J (1987) Asian Economic Handbook. Euromonitor Publication Ltd. London, pp 245–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Wannawong
    • 1
  • G. H. Belt
    • 1
  • C. W. McKetta
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations