Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp 541–546 | Cite as

Accuracy of death certificates: a population-based, complete-coverage, one-year autopsy study in East Germany

  • Dieter Modelmog
  • Sibylle Rahlenbeck
  • Dimitrios Trichopoulos
Research Paper

The Goerlitz Autopsy Study is a population-based autopsy study, conducted in 1987 in the municipality of Goerlitz, population 78,484, in former East Germany. It is unique in that 1,023 (96.5 percent) of the 1,060 subjects who died in the municipality over a period of one year were investigated by full autopsy. An underlying cause was assigned to every death, using the procedures recommended by the International Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, ninth revision, German edition. Assignment of cause of death was done independently by the attending clinician and the pathology team who performed the autopsy. The data were analyzed through cross-classification of deaths by death certificate diagnosis and autopsy-based diagnosis. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for the death certificate diagnoses, assuming that the autopsy findings represent the correct reference set. Overall, 47 percent of diagnoses on death certificates differed from those based on autopsy and, for 30 percent of the subjects, the difference crossed a major disease category. The proportion of disagreement was higher for deaths occurring in nursing homes and among the very old, but was unrelated to gender. In the death certificates, diseases of the circulatory system and endocrine and metabolic disorders were over-represented, whereas infectious diseases, neoplasms, and respiratory, digestive, and genitourinary diseases were under-represented. Neoplasms in the death certificates are characterized by relatively high sensitivity and predictive values, even though these were still unsatisfactory, given the chronicity of the clinical course and the opportunities available for correct diagnosis. Infections and respiratory diseases in the death certificates have low sensitivity but comparatively high predictive values, because these disease categories have relatively high diagnostic specificity. In contrast, circulatory diseases in the death certificates have high sensitivity but modest predictive value, because of their relatively low diagnostic specificity. These results reinforce the concern about the accuracy of death certificates and their potential for utilization in epidemiologic studies.

Key words

Autopsy death certificates Germany mortality vital statistics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Staatsverlagder DDR. Statistisches Jabrbuch 1987 der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (Statistical Year-book of the German Democratic Republic; in German). Berlin: Staatsverlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kircher T, Nelson J, Burdo H. The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 1263–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Britton M. Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy. Acta Med Scand 1974; 196: 203–10.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engel LW, Strauchen JA, Chiazze L, Heid M. Accuracy of death certification in an autopsied population with specific attention to malignant neoplasms and vascular diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 111: 99–112.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cameron HM, McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathology 1981; 133: 273–83.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasser JH. The quality and utility of death certificate data. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 231–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Percy C, Stanek E, Gloeckler L. Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect of cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 242–50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schottenfeld D, Eaton M, Sommers SC, Alonso DR, Wilkinson C. The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. Bull NY Acad Med 1982; 58: 778–94.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camilli AE, Robbins DR, Lebowitz MD. Death certificate reporting of confirmed airways obstructive disease. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 795–800.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Internationale Klassifikation der Krankheiten, Verletzungen und Todesursachen (ICD-9) der Weltgesund-beitsorganisation in der 9 Revision von 1975 (in German). Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modelmog D, Goertchen R, Kunze K, et al. Der gegenwaertige Stellenwert einer annaehernd einhundertprozentigen Obduktionsquote (Görlitzer Studie). Haeufigkeit von Krankheitsgruppen als Grundleiden (in German). Z Klin Med 1989; 44: 2163–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Modelmog D, Goertchen R, Steinhard K, Sinn HP, Stahr H. Vergleich der Mortalitätsstatistik einer Stadt bei unterschiedlicher Obduktionsquote (Georlitzer Studie) (in German). Pathologe 1991; 12: 191–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacMahon B, Pugh TF. Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gross R, Fischer R. Fehldiagnosen: Bedeutung-Umfang-Ursachen (in German). Diagnostik 1980; 13: 117–20.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Percy C, Dolman A. Comparison of the coding of death certificates related to cancer in seven countries. Publ Health Rep 1978; 93: 335–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Modelmog
    • 1
  • Sibylle Rahlenbeck
    • 2
  • Dimitrios Trichopoulos
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Pathology, Bacteriology and Serology, Goerlitz HospitalGoerlitzGermany
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthYale UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations