Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp 616–626 | Cite as

Restoration management of abandoned chalk grassland in the Netherlands

  • Roland Bobbink
  • J. H. Willems

After abandonment of chalk grassland in the Netherlands, Brachypodium pinnatum had become very dominant and this resulted in a dramatic decrease of plant diversity. Restoration of these abandoned sites is important, because of its former high diversity with many nationally endangered species. To restore the chalk grassland vegetation, the impact of the introduction of different experimental cutting regimes was investigated during three years. The thick litter layer and the dominance of Brachypodium was strongly reduced after introduction of all cutting regimes. In all cutting treatments forb phytomass increased considerably, especially in the twice-a-year cutting vegetation, where the forb phytomass became as high as that of Brachypodium. Phanerogamic species diversity was stimulated in all cutting regimes. Especially the number of short-lived forbs. with a persistent seed bank, increased markedly in the twice-a-year cutting treatment. It is concluded that cutting the vegetation twice is adequate to reduce the negative effects of the thick litter layer and the abundant growth of Brachypodium. It creates an appropriate starting point for more detinite management, whether mowing or grazing. However, the restoration of a more complete species assortment strongly depends on the re-invasion possibilities of these species.


diversity cutting regimes Brachypodium pinnatum dominance habitat restoration chalk grassland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bakker, J.P. (1989) Nature management by grazing and cutting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Bobbink, R. (1991) Effects of nutrient enrichment in Dutch chalk grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 28–41.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbink, R. and Willems, J.H. (1987) Increasing dominance of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in chalk grasslands; a threat to a species-rich ecosystem. Biol. Conserv. 40, 301–14.Google Scholar
  4. Bobbink, R. and Willems, J.H. (1991) Impact of different cutting regimes on the performance of Brachypodium pinnatum in Dutch chalk grassland. Biol. Conserv. 56, 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Dierschke, H. (1985) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Bestandesdynamik von Kalkmagerrasen (Mesobromion) in Südniedersachsen, I. Vegetationsentwicklung auf Dauerflächen 1972–1984. Münst. Geogr. Arb. 20, 9–24.Google Scholar
  6. Dierschke, H. and Engels, M. (1991) Response of a Bromus crectus grassland (Mesobromion) to abandonment and different cutting regimes. In Modern Ecology: basic and applied aspects (G., Esser and D., Overdieck eds) pp. 375–97. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Ellenberg, H. (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. and Hunt, R. (1988) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Grubb, P.J. and Key, B.A. (1976) Clearance of shrub and re-establishment of chalk grassland on the Devils Dyke. Nature Cambs. 18, 18–22.Google Scholar
  11. Hakes, W. (1988) Vergleich der planzenbestandesstruktur genutzter und brachliegender Kalk-Halbtrockenrasen in Nordhessen. Phytocoenologia 16, 289–314.Google Scholar
  12. Heukels, H. and Van Der, Meijden, R. (1983) Flora van Nederland, 20th edition. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Hillegers, H.P.M., ed. (1985) De Bemelerberg. Publ. Natuurhist. Gen. Limb. 34, 1–5 (in Dutch with summary in English).Google Scholar
  14. Hodgkin, S.E. (1984) Scrub encroachment and its effect on soil fertility on Newborough Warren, Anglesey, Wales. Biol. Conserv. 29, 99–119.Google Scholar
  15. Jeffrey, D.W. and Piggot, C.D. (1973) The response of grasslands on sugar-limestone in Teesdale to application of phosphorus and nitrogen. J. Ecol. 61, 85–92.Google Scholar
  16. Krüsi, B. (1981) Phenological methods in permanent plot research. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stift. Rübel, Zürich 75, 1–116.Google Scholar
  17. Ratcliffe, D.A. (1984) Post-medieval and recent changes in British vegetation: the culmination of human influence. New Phytol. 98, 73–100.Google Scholar
  18. Rizand, A., Marrs, R.H., Gough, M.W. and Wells, T.C.E. (1989) Long-term effects of various conservation management treatments on selected soil properties of chalk grassland. Biol. Conserv. 49, 105–13.Google Scholar
  19. Schenkeveld, A.J. and Verkaar, H.J. (1984) On the ecology of short-lived forbs in chalk grasslands. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Silvertown, J. (1980) Leaf-canopy-induced seed dormancy in a grassland flora. New Phytol. 85, 109–18.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, C.T., Elston, J. and Bunting, A.H. (1971) The effects of cutting and fertilizer treatment on the yield and botanical composition of chalk turfs. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 26, 213–9.Google Scholar
  22. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Van Tooren, B.F. and Bobbink, R. (1987) Het beheer van droge, kalkrijke graslanden. In Verslag studiedag Dijkenbeheer: direktie NMF-Zeeuwse Milieufederatie, Middelburg (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  24. Verkaar, H.J. and Schenkeveld, A.J. (1984) On the ecology of short-lived forbs in chalk grasslands: seedling development under low photon flux density conditions. Flora 175, 135–51.Google Scholar
  25. Verkaar, H.J., Schenkeveld, A.J. and Brand, J.M. (1983) On the ecology of short-lived forbs in chalk grasslands; micro-site tolerance in relation to vegetation structure. Vegetatio 52, 91–102.Google Scholar
  26. Weils, T.C.E. (1971) A comparison of the effects of sheep grazing and mechanical cutting on the structure and botanical composition of chalk grassland. In The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation (E., Duffey and A.S., Watt, eds) pp. 325–30. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Wells, T.C.E. (1974) Some concepts of grassland management. In Grassland ecology and wildlife management (E., Duffey, ed) pp. 163–74. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Willems, J.H. (1990) Calcareous grasslands in continental Europe. In Calcareous grasslands—Ecology and Management (S.R., Hillier, D.W.H., Walton and D.A., Wells, eds) pp. 3–10. Bluntisham: Bluntisham Books.Google Scholar
  29. Willems, J.H. and Bobbink, R. (1990) Spatial pattern in the development of chalk grassland on old fields in The Netherlands. In Spatial processes in Plant Communities (F. Krahulec, J.H. Willems and A. Agnew) pp. 237–49. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Wolkinger, F. and Plank, S. (1981) Dry grasslands of Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Bobbink
    • 1
  • J. H. Willems
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Section Environmental EcologyUniversity of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations