Instructional Science

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 391–401 | Cite as

Learning activities in individually prescribed instruction

  • Joseph Shimron

Abstract

A major goal of the Primary Education Project (PEP) and Individually Prescribed Instruction (IPI) programs is to adapt the educational system to individual differences. The extent to which this adaptation occurs is under continuous study and evaluation. The major purposes of this pilot study were: (1) to determine whether or not distinctive patterns of behavior exist for students of different learning characteristics (e.g. learning rate), and (2) whether or not and the degree to which the IPI system succeeds in adapting its instructional procedures to these behavior patterns.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bolvin, J. O. and Glaser, R. (1971). Individualized instruction, in Allen, D. W. and Seifman, E., eds. The Teacher's Handbook, pp. 270–279. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  2. Cronbach, L. J. (1967). How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? in Cagné, R. M., ed., Learning and Individual Differences, pp. 23–39. Columbus, O.: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  3. Glaser, R. (1968). Adapting the elementary school to individual performance, in Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, pp. 3–36. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  4. Glaser, R. (1972). Individuals and learning: The new aptitudes, Educational Researcher, 1(6), 5–13.Google Scholar
  5. Good, T. L. and Brophy, J. E. (1969). Analyzing Classroom Interaction. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas. Reprint Series No. 26.Google Scholar
  6. Klein, R. D., Roden, A. H., Gentile, J. R., Resnick, L. B., Reynolds, L. J. and Bachmeyer, B. (1972). The Effects of a Systematic Manipulation of Contingencies upon Overt Work Behavior in a Primary Classroom. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Publication 1972/16.Google Scholar
  7. Lindvall, C. M. and Bolvin, J. O. (1966) The Project for Individually Prescribed Instruction: The Oakleaf Project. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Working Paper 8.Google Scholar
  8. Lindvall, C. M. and Volvin, J. O. (1967). Programmed instruction in the schools: An application of programming principles in Individually Prescribed Instruction, Sixtysixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, pp. 217–254. Chicago: NSSE.Google Scholar
  9. Resnick, L. B. (1967). Design of an Early Learning Curriculum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Working Paper 16.Google Scholar
  10. Resnick, L. B. (1972). Open education: Some tasks for technology, Educational Technology, 12(1), 70–76.Google Scholar
  11. Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt. Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Wang, M. C., Resnick, L. B., and Schuetz, P. A. (1970). PEP in the Frick Elementary School: Interim Evaluation Report of the Primary Education Project, 1968–1969. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center. Working Paper 57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Shimron

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations