Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 303–310 | Cite as

Registration of lung cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records

  • David Brewster
  • Calum Muir
  • Judith Crichton
Research Papers

Lung cancer represents a major public health problem in Scotland. Cancer registration data permit the approximate incidence of this disease to be measured directly and the projected incidence to be modelled. Thus, in addition to epidemiologic studies and survival analyses, cancer registration data may be used for planning and monitoring relevant health services. Since the value of the data depends on their quality, we undertook a largescale study of the accuracy of cancer registration data in Scotland. The medical records of a random sample of cancer registrations attributed to the year 1990 were sought. The sample contained 340 registrations of lung cancer, 309 (91 percent) of which had relevant medical records available for scrutiny. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Results revealed 19 discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, gender, and date of birth) involving 16 (5.2 percent) patients. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates were found to be: 7.8 percent in postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis, 10 percent in ‘anniversary date’ (excluding differences of six weeks or less), 12.5 percent in histologic verification status; 4.2 percent in ICD-9 site code (the first three digits), and 15.5 percent in four digit ICD-O morphology code (excluding ‘inferred’ morphology codes). This relatively high level of accuracy gives weight to routinely published incidence figures and supports the use of these data for exploratory epidemiologic studies, assessment of health care needs, and calculation of survival.

Key words

Data collection data reliability and validity lung neoplasms quality control registries Scotland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Information and Statistics Division. Scottish Health Statistics, 1994. Edinburgh, Scotland (UK): Information & Statistics Division, National Health Service in Scotland, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gillis CR, Hole DJ, Lamont DW, Graham AC, Ramage S. The incidences of lung cancer and breast cancer in women in Glasgow. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1331.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scottish Home and Health Department. Review of the Scottish Cancer Registration System. Edinburgh, Scotland (UK): SHHD, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brewster D, Crichton J, Muir CS. Accuracy of 1990 Cancer Registration Data in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland (UK): Information & Statistics Division, Directorate of Information Services, National Health Service in Scotland, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brewster D, Crichton J, Muir CS. How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data. Br J Cancer 1994; 70: 954–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    West RR. Accuracy of cancer registration. Br J Prev Soc Med 1976; 30: 187–92.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polissar L, Feigl P, Lane WW, Glaefke G, Dahlberg S. Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: Results from an extensive recoding survey. JNCI 1984; 72: 1007–14.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization. Manual of the International Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, Ninth Revision. London, UK: HMSO, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kendrick S, Clarke J. The Scottish Record Linkage System. Health Bulletin (Edinburgh) 1993; 51: 72–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. First Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J, eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume VI. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1992; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 120.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kee F, Gorman D, Odling-Smee W. Confidence intervals and interval cancers-needles and haystacks? Public Health 1992; 106: 29–35.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gulliford MC, Bell J, Bourne HM, Petruckevitch A. The reliability of Cancer Registry records. Br J Cancer 1993; 67: 819–21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Black RJ, Sharp L, Kendrick SW. Trends in Cancer Survival in Scotland 1968–1990. Edinburgh, Scotland (UK): Information * Statistics Division, Directorate of Information Services, National Health Service in Scotland, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacLennan R. Items of patient information which may be collected by registries. In: Jenson OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, eds. Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1991; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 95: 43–63.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapham R, Waugh NR. An audit of the quality of cancer registration data. Br J Cancer 1992; 66: 552–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Byers TE, Vena JE, Rzepka TF. Predilection of lung cancer for the upper lobes: an epidemiologic inquiry. JNCI 1984; 72: 1271–5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    College of American Pathologists. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). Skokie, IL (USA): CAP, 1977.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muir CS, Percy C. Classification and coding of neoplasms. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, eds. Cancer Registration Principles and Methods. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1991; IARC Sci. Pub. No. 95: 64–81.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Codling BW, Pheby D, Hagen DL, Duffin MF. Cancer registration by linking pathology and District PAS data. Br J Cancer 1990; 62: 271–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Travis WD, Travis LB, Devesa SS. Lung cancer. Cancer 1995; 75(Suppl): 191–202.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scottish Cancer Intelligence Unit Surveillance Group. Indicators of the Quality of Data in the Scottish Cancer Registration Scheme 1990–1991. Edinburgh, Scotland (UK): Information & Statistics Division, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Brewster
    • 1
  • Calum Muir
    • 2
    • 3
  • Judith Crichton
    • 4
  1. 1.Common Services Agency for the National Health ServiceUK
  2. 2.Cancer Registration of Scotlandthe International Association of Cancer RegistriesScotlandUK
  3. 3.Edinburgh and Glasgow UniversitiesUK
  4. 4.Cancer Registration of ScotlandScotladUK

Personalised recommendations