Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 205–213 | Cite as

Decreasing rates of cervical cancer among American Indians and Hispanics in New Mexico (United States)

  • Ann Chao
  • Thomas M. Becker
  • Scott W. Jordan
  • Ron Darling
  • Frank D. Gilliland
  • Charles R. Key
Review Papers

Minority women in New Mexico (United States)—including American Indian and Hispanic women—have shown disproportionately high incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer during the 1960s and 1970s. Several public health programs in New Mexico were directed toward early detection of cervical cellular abnormalities, particularly targeting the state's minority women. To evaluate the effectiveness of these programs, we examined the New Mexico Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data collected from 1969–92, and calculated average annual, age-specific, and age-adjusted incidence rates by ethnic group (American Indian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White) for five-year time intervals. We also calculated age-adjusted mortality rates for cervical cancer in the same ethnic groups using state vital records. Age-adjusted incidence rates for invasive cervical cancer show substantial temporal decreases, especially for minority women in the state. The age-adjusted incidence rate decreased by 66 percent, from 30.3 to 10.3 per 100,000 for American Indian women, and by 61 percent, from 26.1 to 10.2 per 100,000 for Hispanic women. A stage shift to earlier stages of cervical neoplasia occurred over the study period, with a substantially higher proportion of in situ compared with invasive cancers diagnosed in the most recent cf the most remote time period. The ratio of incidence rates of in situ to invasive cancers changed dramatically for both American Indian and Hispanic women. Cervical cancer mortality rates decreased steadily among Hispanic women from 1958 to 1992; the decrease among American Indian women was less stable and fluctuated due to small numbers. Ongoing targeted sceening programs should help to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality further in New Mexico.

Key words

American Indians cervix cancer Hispanic-Americans United States women 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    New Mexico Tumor Registry. Malignancies diagnosed 1992. UNM Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Albuquerque, NM (USA), 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parkin DM, Läärä E, Muir CS. Estimates of the world-wide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980. Int J Cancer 1988; 41: 184–97.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jordan SW, Sopher RL, Key CR, Brylinski D, Huang J. Carcinoma of the cervix in southwestern American Indian women. Cancer 1972; 29: 1235–41.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jordan SW, Key CR. Carcinoma of the cervix in southwestern American Indians: Results of a cytologic detection program. Cancer 1981; 47: 2523–32.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker TM, Wheeler CM, Key CR, Samet JM. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New Mexico's Hispanics, American Indins, and non-Hispanic whites. West J Med 1992; 156: 376–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Key CR. Cancer incidence and mortality in New Mexico, 1973–1977. In: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]: Incidence and Mortality Data 1973–1977. Bethesda, MD (USA): National Cancer Institute, 1981; NCI Monogr No. 57; National Institutes of Health Pub. No. 81–2330; 489–595.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker TM, Wiggins C, Key CR, Samet JM. Ischemic heart disease mortality in Hispanics, American Indians, and non-Hispanic whites in New Mexico, 1958–1982. Circulation 1988; 78: 302–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiggins CL, Becker TM, Key CR, Samet JM. Stomach cancer among New Mexico's American Indians, Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic whites. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 1595–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keyfitz N. Sampling variance of standardized mortality rates. Hum Biol 1966; 38: 309–17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Office of Technology Assessment. Indian Health Care OTA-H-290. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burhansstipnnov L, Dresser C. Documentation of the cancer research needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives. In: Native American Monograph No. 1. Rockville, MD (USA): National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 1993: 2–1–2–15.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McPherson RS, et al. Risk factors for cervical dysplasia in southwestern American Indian women: A pilot study. Alaska Med 1993; 35: 255–63.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases and other risk factors for cervical dysplasia among southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. JAMA 1994; 271: 1181–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buckley DI, McPherson S, North CQ, Becker TM. Dietary micronutrients and cervical dysplasia in southwestern American Indian women. Nutr Cancer 1992; 17: 179–85.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, et al. Contraceptive and reproductive risks for cervical dysplasia in southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 913–22.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becker TM, Wheeler CM, McGough NS, et al. Cigarette smoking and other risk factors for cervical dysplasia in southwestern Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 1994; 3: 113–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Medical Expenditure Survey. Findings From the Survey of American Indians and Alaska Natives: Personal Health Practices. Rockville, MD (USA): Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, October 31, 1991-September 30, 1993. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1994; July: 530–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters RK, Chao A, Mack TM, Thomas D, Bernstein L, Henderson BE. Increased frequency of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in young women in Los Angeles County. JNCI 1986; 76: 423–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwartz SM, Weiss NS. Increased incidence of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in young women in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124: 1045–7.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Devesa SS, Young JL, Brinton LA, Fraumeni JFJr. Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer. Cancer 1989; 64: 2184–90.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boon ME, Baak JPA, Kurver PJH, Overdiep SH, Verdonk GW. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: An underdiagmosed lesion. Cancer 1981; 48: 768–73.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitchell H, Medley G, Gordon I, Giles G. Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: No strong evidence of benefit. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 894–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jordan SW, Key CR, Wright DE. Selected characteristics of cervical cancer incidence cases. Acta Cytol 1982; 26: 823–32.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peters RK, Thomas D, Hagan DG, Mack TM, Henderson BE. Risk factors for invasive cervical cancer among Latinas and non-Latinas in Los Angeles County. JNCI 1986; 77: 1063–77.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brinton LA, Tashima KT, Lehman HF, et al. Epidemiology of cervical cancer by cell type. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 1706–11.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ursin G, Peters RK, Henderson BE, d'Ablaing G, Monroe KR, Pike MC. Oral contraceptive use and adenocarcinoma of cervix. Lancet 1994; 344: 1390–4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samet JM, Key CR, Hunt WC, Goodwin J. Survival of American Indian and Hispanic cancer patients in New Mexico and Arizona, 1969–1982. JNCI 1987; 79: 457–63.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lyon JL, Gardner JW. The rising frequency of hysterectomy: Its effect on uterine cancer rates. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 105: 439–43.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dicker RC, Scally MJ, Greenspan JR, et al. Hysterectomy among women of reproductive age: Trends in the United States, 1970–1978. JAMA 1982; 248: 323–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Percy C, Stanek E, Gloeckler L. Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 242–50.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Becker TM, Wiggins CL, Key CR, Samet JM. Symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions: A leading cause of death among minorities. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 664–8.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses.JAMA 1989; 262: 931–4.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Howe HI, Lehnherr M, Qualls RY. Using central cancer-registry data to monitor progress in early detection of breast and cervical cancer (Illinois, United States). Cancer Causes Control 1995; 6: 155–63.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koss LG. Precancerous lesions of the epithelia of the uterine cervix. In: Wied GL, Keebla CM, Koss LG, Reagan JW, eds. Compendium on Diagnostic Cytology. Chicago, IL (USA): Tutorials of Cytology, 1988: 96–104.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Unpublished data, University of New Mexico Cytopathology Laboratory.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Science Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Chao
  • Thomas M. Becker
  • Scott W. Jordan
  • Ron Darling
  • Frank D. Gilliland
  • Charles R. Key

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations